Following on from other thread what size division would you like to see.
View Poll Results: What size should SPL be......
- Voters
- 166. You may not vote on this poll
-
10 teams
1 0.60% -
12 teams
3 1.81% -
14 teams
10 6.02% -
16 teams
86 51.81% -
18 teams
54 32.53% -
20 teams
12 7.23%
Results 1 to 21 of 21
Thread: Spl Reconstruction
-
20-10-2010 08:39 AM #1
Spl Reconstruction
Last edited by Spike Mandela; 20-10-2010 at 08:41 AM.
-
20-10-2010 08:53 AM #2
16 for me , that way if they wanted to keep their mental split, at least everyone would still be playing the same amount of games. Imagine winning the league by playing 36 games and to be relegated having played 40. Just doesn't seem right to me.
Never one to laugh at others misfortune but today could only have been improved by rangers getting horsed and God pissing down a meteor shower of fifty pound notes on Edinburgh
Copyright BadMartini Wed 27th Jan 2010
-
20-10-2010 09:13 AM #3
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 5,024
18 teams, with 2 or 3 relegation positions.
-
20-10-2010 09:18 AM #4
18 - 2 up, 2 down automatically and a home and away play off between 3rd bottom of the SPL and 3rd top of the First Division.
-
20-10-2010 09:39 AM #5
Should be 2 leagues of 18 with regional divisions all the way down to amateur level!
-
20-10-2010 09:50 AM #6
Early days with the poll but already showing the option that the SPL are reported to like lagging well behind. Time for fans to get a voice, surely.
-
20-10-2010 11:37 AM #7
Why do folk want a 16 team league? you will get less for your ST money and no doubt you will be paying the same as you are now. A 14 team league will make the open when the crowds start to drop
-
20-10-2010 12:02 PM #8
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 1,508
16 teams with a league cup as used to be made up of a four team section from mixed divisions, this used to be a curtain raiser to the new season when the league did not start until september, things were bad back then but not as bad as now, it could not have been that bad as Celtic won the european cup when we had such a set up.
-
20-10-2010 12:03 PM #9
I just voted 16 teams, play each other home and away, then split the league into two 8's, playing each other once, this makes another 3 or 4 games at home and either 3 or 4 away. Yes, you will play 1 or two less games at home but overall you play 37 games compared to 38 the now. 1 team automatically relegated and the other plays a play off against the runner up in division 1. The only issue I can think of is you can only play teams 3 times so working out the home or away fixture after the split maybe tricky.
-
20-10-2010 12:23 PM #10
16 team SPL & 1st Division (Scottish Championship?) each playing 30 games a season.
Restructure the league cup to a 32 team competition in the same format as the champions league with 8 leagues of 4 made up from these 32 teams. Seeding done based on league position from the previous season (ie top 8 in SPL = pot 1, bottom 8 in SPL = pot 2). This gives each club an additional, guaranteed, 6 cup games each that could be included to season tickets etc and cover for the drop in league games.
-
20-10-2010 12:52 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
has the league cup idea even been considered?
-
20-10-2010 01:27 PM #12
I honestly can't understand the want for more teams in the league. Playing each team twice a season would be guff in Scotland. I don't have a season ticket whilst I'm at Uni in Aberdeen but for the ten or so years I had one previously the games you look forward to the most are Hearts, Rangers, Celtic and occasionally Aberdeen, Dundee Utd, depending on where they/we are in the league.
With this format we would play these teams ONCE at home. So for me a season ticket would consist of 14 or so average games and 3 or so that I'd really look forward to. The current 'top 6' games would be filled with 1st division pish, instead of an extra game against Huns/Celtic/Hearts. To me, that is not worth the same amount that the season ticket is currently worth and I know I for one would have to seriously consider purchasing a season ticket when I graduate.
Season ticket sales would fall, with people buying a single ticket for the 'big games' leaving an attendence of about 8,000-11,000 for every other game in a 20,000 seater stadium. No thank you.
-
20-10-2010 02:24 PM #13This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This is why the main reform needed to the Scottish game isn't tinkering with the number of teams in the league but moving to a single administrative association.
Do that, and you unlock the door to changing the whole shabang!
-
20-10-2010 03:28 PM #14
- Join Date
- Dec 2007
- Posts
- 458
16 teams please.
1 home 1 away and expanded cup competition.
-
20-10-2010 03:44 PM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Sounds like a decent idea TBF However how likely is the league cup to be included in your ST- unlikely IMO
-
20-10-2010 04:31 PM #16
Another option i have rattling about in my head is a 16 team SPL playing each other twice in a 30 game season then having the league split into 4 "mini-leagues" with 1st to 4th playing each other home & away again to decide the title & qualification places for Europe and 13th to 16th doing the same to decide which 2 get relegated (points wouldn't be carried over into the mini-leagues so its all to play for). It would mean a few meaningless games for those teams in the 5th to 8th and 9th to 12th mini leagues but it would be an exciting few weeks at the end of the season, give other teams outwith the OF a crack at the title or Champions league place and assuming the OF will always be in the top 4 give the TV companies their 4 old firm games a season.
-
20-10-2010 04:34 PM #17
How's this for a total revamp?...
Adopt the NFL conference set up. Lets say 20 teams, split them into small mini leagues of say 5 teams so it would liook something like this -
group A: Hibs, Motherwell Dundee Inverness QOS
group B: Hearts Hamilton Dundee UTD Ross County Raith
group C: Celtic St. Johnstone Morton Kilmarnock Dunfremline
Groue D: Rangers St Mirren Aberdeen Falkirk Partick
Everyone plays each other home and away (all 20 teams) so thats 19 home and 19 away =38. But all teams are still in there mini leagues ultimatly just compeating agains the 4 other sides in their group.
You then go to a post season where the top 2 sides in each group go through this then would be a knock out format and have a Super Bowl style finale!
Bonkers I know but it would give all sides a real chance of progress and keep things very competitive.
-
-
20-10-2010 05:39 PM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
On that logic we could finish second in our group to Motherwell (amass several less wins than the OF) then win 3 games cup style and win the league. Love it
They would never go for it but it sure would be exciting!!!
-
20-10-2010 07:19 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
21-10-2010 11:43 AM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
That's how we used to play when I was a lad. The sections were made up according to League position the previous season; 4 sections from the First Division, and five from the old Second, plus the two relegated teams.
Somehow or other we always seemed to be in the same section as Rangers....
It would need to be decided whether the top two from each section, or only the winners progressed to the knock-out stages. The Scottish Cup could be left as it is, IMO. But it could be a very good way forward - provided some clubs were forced to put their houses in order financially. Re-organisation won't sort things on its own; the SPL, the SFA, and the clubs themselves have to start to put their respective houses in order.
MyJo's plan would give every club 18 home games a season at least, plus European ties and SC ties as a bonus. It would be a good idea, IMO, to reinstate a proper Reserve League as well. I think it would work.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks