So, we have all discussed the sfa in the other threads but I wanted to try and get some answers directly about this body. Hopefully someone can help.
Who decides who gets to run the SFA?
Who does the SFA answer to?
Does the SPL have to stay under the SFA's remit and control?
Why can George Peat not read his own emails?
I feel like hitting my head against a brick wall with the sfa
Results 1 to 12 of 12
Thread: SFA - we know what it stands for
-
24-08-2010 06:23 AM #1
SFA - we know what it stands for
-
24-08-2010 06:27 AM #2
To answer your questions...
Who decides who gets to run the SFA? Celtic and Rangers
Who does the SFA answer to? Celtic and Rangers
Does the SPL have to stay under the SFA's remit and control? If by "SFA" you mean "Celtic and Rangers", Yes
Why can George Peat not read his own emails? He's probably too busy attending to matters involving Cetic and Rangers
DCI Hunt
-
24-08-2010 07:48 AM #3
I can think of plenty acronyms for SFA..........Unfortunately, most of them would cause the "swear filter" on here to have a nervous breakdown.
-
24-08-2010 07:59 AM #4
On a related-issue, I sent an e-mail to Drew Herbertson, who is Head of Referees or something like that, recently. I was asking for further information regarding the SFA Disciplinary Process for referees. I also copied in two of his colleagues as per the info available on the SFA website.
After about a week I received a reply from Mr Herbertson asking for further information, which I duly provided. I never received a reply, leading me to the conclusion that either:
a) Mr Herbertson doesn't know or understand the process.
b) No process exists.
c) The understanding of such a process is above mere mortals like actual fans.
d) Mr Herbertson is part of a corrupt process/organisation that doesn't like scrutiny.
e) Some combination of more than one of the above.
-
24-08-2010 08:34 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Going to keep pestering them though.
-
-
24-08-2010 08:54 AM #7
I often hear it said who do you support the most, Hibs or Scotland. And you get the usual folk saying it should be both, they will never play each other, and its possible to support both. Well i'm sorry i cant support that ****in erse keeper who plays for the huns at any time.
I cant spend 90 minutes hating the twat, then cheer him on when he is picked for the national team. Its players like him that have turned me off the national side. We should have unconditional love for our national side, but because of his antics, and others before him, mine and i imagine many more have been sickened by their actions, and its only natural we are picking out league sides over the national one.
-
24-08-2010 08:56 AM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
These grand conspiracy theories are embarassing. I do not believe they exist, certainly not with referees. They may make incompetent or unpopular decisions, but thats a whole different thing.
The governing body of a sport has, by its nature, to balance the often mutually exclusive goals of its consituent parts. Clubs will have one aim, supporters another, and the demands of the national team and mainitaining positive revenue streams may go another direction again.
Most embarassing, though, is seeing Hibs fans going down the route of a persecution complex. Lets leave that to the deluded ones over the road.
-
24-08-2010 09:13 AM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What persecution complex?
I have just asked for some clarity on some points
-
24-08-2010 10:54 AM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
24-08-2010 11:07 AM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
My comment by the way about george peat, was because on the sfa website it has his pa's email adress rather than his, I more wondered if george could answer an email even if he wanted to?
-
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks