Someone just posted this over on Kickback. What does it mean?
VILNIUS, Jul 28, BNS - Heart of Midlothian, the owner of the Scottish football club Hearts, plans to pledge its Tynecastle Stadium in Edinburgh as collateral with its majority shareholder, Lithuanian-based Ukio Banko Investicine Grupe (Ukio Bankas Investment Group, or UBIG).
Heart of Midlothian plans to use the stadium, which is valued at 57.794 million litas (EUR 16.75 mln), to additionally secure the repayment of a loan provided by UBIG, the group said in an explanatory note to its 2009 financial statements filed with the Lithuanian Center of Registers.
UBIG holds an 81 percent stake in Heart of Midlothian.
In the document, UBIG did not give details as to the amount of the loan issued to the Scottish company, but said that the net value of the group's sports-related loans at the end of 2009 was 117.818 million litas and that the value of loans issued in Britain was 157.273 million litas.
The net value of all loans issued by UBIG as of late 2009 amounted to 264.193 million litas, up 19.7 percent compared with a year ago.
UBIG's shareholders at the end of 2009 included Vladimir Romanov with a 26.18 percent stake, Newfield Investors with 25 percent, Impexnet with 20.24 percent, Baltmet Holding with 13.97 percent, Kauno Tiekimas with 5.9 percent, and other shareholders with 8.71 percent.
(EUR 1 = LTL 3.45)
Results 1 to 30 of 74
Thread: Tynecastle as Collateral
-
29-07-2010 10:15 AM #1
Tynecastle as Collateral
-
29-07-2010 10:19 AM #2
It sounds to me like Hearts no longer own Tynecastle and they have given it to Ubig to pay of some of thier debt.
Its started.....
-
29-07-2010 10:19 AM #3
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Father Noel Furlong
- Posts
- 9,934
In a nutshell, HoMFC Plc now don't have any assets other than the players. They've handed the deeds over to Lithuania.
-
-
29-07-2010 10:21 AM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hey but nothing to see here... move on now.....
-
29-07-2010 10:23 AM #6
Basically UBIG can now take the stadium as soon as hearts default on loan payments which they can't afford.
I love being a hibby
Who are hearts playing tonight?
-
29-07-2010 10:29 AM #7This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
It's not all doom and gloom over at the pink palace as they have yet to bank the prize money for winning the Champions League last year?
-
29-07-2010 10:34 AM #8
But at the end of the day they still just owe the money to themselves so they have nothing really to worry about, do they?
-
29-07-2010 10:36 AM #9
Basically Hearts are trying to refinance using the same people they are in debt to. So to get another loan to pay back the loan they already got they have to put collateral on the line to cover it as insurance.
Imagine you had a lot of debt and wanted to put it into one easy repayment you would have to put your house as collateral so the company would give you the cash.
-
29-07-2010 10:37 AM #10
They owe the money to themselves so there is no need to worry about it, Im sure that giving thier only asset to thier debtors is some form of tax saving scheme because the debt that they owe themselves doesn't really need to be paid off, does it??
-
29-07-2010 10:47 AM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 10:50 AM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 10:50 AM #13
- Join Date
- Oct 2003
- Location
- Easter Road
- Age
- 42
- Posts
- 727
It's intersting hearing Jambo say that "we owe the money to ourselves". They are then (when saying "ourselves") referring to UBIG rather than HoM.
You know that football is in a business age when fans consider themselves as being part of a banking group.
-
29-07-2010 10:51 AM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2007
- Location
- Father Noel Furlong
- Posts
- 9,934
In another announcement today....UBIG sell off another sports complex as real estate for development.
Vilnius Land Sale
-
29-07-2010 10:53 AM #15This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Even if it was true they must be the only company that owes money to themselves yet charges a huge amount of interest for the loan they have given to themselves, thus increasing the debt they owe to themselves and therefore the interest payments they pay to themselves. Keep on believing fuds!
-
29-07-2010 10:54 AM #16This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I like a good Derby but what the heck. Yams.
-
29-07-2010 11:01 AM #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 5,842
So if the PBS is now collateral for the money owed to UBIG, when (if) Hearts new stand gets built, what are they going to use for collateral to finance the building work?
-
29-07-2010 11:08 AM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 11:09 AM #19
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 3,002
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So its not that they owe it to themselves they just owe to a company that Vlad has an interest in as well as several other companies and investors.
-
29-07-2010 11:18 AM #20
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Age
- 68
- Posts
- 5,842
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 11:18 AM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Commercial activities: conventional and bonded warehouses for rent, rooms for rent, loading - unloading services, wholesale trade.
-
29-07-2010 11:20 AM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 11:23 AM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
http://i.acdn.us/image/A1527/152718/300_152718.gif
Must do better deals than Vlad and Co.Last edited by iwasthere1972; 29-07-2010 at 11:26 AM.
-
29-07-2010 11:24 AM #24
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
You get people who invest in stocks and shares, say 1000 at £1 each (Hearts). The price drops to 50p and they've lost half their value. You get the optimists who think that it's a good idea to invest another £500 in the same shares and hope that it hits 75p so they can sell and get out even.
However, usually it ends up that there's only one way the share is going if it has such a steep drops. And that's down. They (Romanov / UBIG) could sell and cut their losses, which it doesn't look like they'll do. They're effectively 'stuck in' because they can't afford a huge loss on Hearts.
-
-
29-07-2010 11:28 AM #26
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 22,240
in laymans terms:
Attention all Yams - yer teas out..!!
-
29-07-2010 11:30 AM #27
I think this is probably related to them moving the loan out of Ukio Bankas the bank as opposed to UBIG the group. The bank will have held the security prior to the move, and now the group has taken it over.
The devil is in the detail though. Of the £17.6m moved, only £5m went to the group and the rest went to "a company related to UBIG". That phrase is important, because it means that the company is not part of the group - if it was the note would have said so. That means that there would seem to be another £12.6m loan due on top of the £39m that PaulSmith mentions. I can't see how they could have racked that much up in the last year, but that's how it appears - how is the £/Lita exchange rate?
I'm also intrigued by how low Vlad's shareholding is - I wonder if he owns/controls some of the other shareholders mentioned. I also wonder if the "company related to UBIG" is taking the interest in cash rather than rolling onto the debt.
-
29-07-2010 11:37 AM #28Originally Posted by Some Yam on BrokebackThis quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
29-07-2010 11:38 AM #29
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 2,064
It's the apathy of them that gets me.
Absolute proof that they no longer own the stadium, the very thing they hounded Robinson out for, and not a dissenting voice.
So used to taking the boaby from Romanov they would meekly accept anything, i genuinely think they would all work as labourers in the demolition of Tynecastle if "Mr" Romanov asked them and assured them it was a good idea.
-
29-07-2010 11:39 AM #30
I reckon they're getting things sorted out for when HoMoFC finally goes down the tubes. Say the Revenue, for example, were about to wind them up, is it not the case that if the property has been signed over as security, then the tax man can't touch it?
This wouldn't be the case if the paperwork wasn't in place.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks