Our master tactician has said in today's EEN Smith will start on Sunday.
IMO should never have started against Motherwell.
Results 1 to 30 of 73
Thread: Smith to start on Sunday
-
07-05-2010 12:07 PM #1
Smith to start on Sunday
-
-
-
07-05-2010 12:17 PM #4
- Join Date
- May 2002
- Posts
- 22,240
then quite simply, he isn't picking the best 11 available.
-
07-05-2010 12:19 PM #5
Smith has something to play for/prove Makalamity doesn't as he is away at the end of next week.
-
-
-
-
07-05-2010 12:26 PM #9
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 143
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 12:28 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 12:28 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 12:29 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 12:30 PM #13
Just a pity we have a very good goalkeeper in Mark Brown that is currently out injured,Pretty sure He will start the season as no 1.
Id Have Maka ahead of Smith for Sunday also.
-
07-05-2010 12:30 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
What planet you been living on
Theres been like 478798797589758758759875079587590 threads
-
07-05-2010 12:31 PM #15
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
By bringing in a ridiculous "goalkeeping pool" though, he is now damned if he does damned if he doesn't. Put Smith in again, he has a howler again, the critics will bash away. Put Maka in, first game (arguably another bloody cliched cup final) for how many ??? Maka has a howler.....again, the critics and fans will bash away. Three keepers is all you need in the squad, not five. But that is John Hughes downfall IMO. Too many unknown "best elevens". The defence has had three keepers, god knows how many centre half pairings, at least four different right backs (Thicot, Hogg, DW and McCormack), three different left backs. The only constant has been the front three of Riordan, Nish and Stokes which we all know has it's limitations and frailties when they are not on form. Midfield (broken record time) is too similar, too narrow and too flat. I kind of always feel sorry for Hibs keepers, as for the last three to four seasons, all goals conceded never seem to be well worked affairs, but standard set pieces, simple crosses into the box, floated corners, etc etc. There you are looking for strong, willing, instinctive defenders. We don't have any. No one anticipates the cross or shot (see Thicot, Hanlon and Hogg versus Well for most recent example). Hogg is also the worst captain in our history and I make no bones about that comment. He has no natural leadership quality at all and is not a good footballer. Take a look at the way he ponders or jogs back into position when a cross comes in ! Will Hanlon progress alongside him ? Both Hanlon and Hogg have been turned and out muscled in the last three games (Lafferty, Elliot, Lukas whatshisname). Murray was made to look slow and dithery because he doesn't get the same level of cover as our right back does, because Derek is (rightly) a forward, and a forward thinking player. Footballers are quite simple beings. For all his days, Derek has only known to attack and score goals. He has never grown up being made to track back, harry and chase, and tackle on the edge of his own box along with his left back. You cannot suddenly change that kind of fixed mindset as they are as I say quite simple (in the nicest possible way). So rather than blame the keepers, I would lay the last few results firmly at the door of our defenders who are far far more culpable IMHO.
-
07-05-2010 12:32 PM #16
We saw from his time at Motherwell that he is a good keeper. We saw that he was a good keeper when he first arrived. Yogi then made the mistake of dropping him, despite him not being at fault for the hammering we took off of the Saints.
Now Yogi is trying to instill some confidence in him by showing him faith. Smith is a senior player, and needs to be able to shake things off. These things are always a gamble, and if he comes through it, he will be a better player for it.
I can see what Yogi's getting at here. With either goalkeeper, Smith or Maka, you'll be taking a chance.
-
07-05-2010 12:39 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I also have never really rated Mark Brown so hopefully I'm totally wrong on that front!
With everyone fit, I'd pick Stack every time. For me he's only really made 1 big mistake, which granted, was at Tynie. But for the majority of his games he's been steady IMO.
-
07-05-2010 12:40 PM #18
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 12:43 PM #19
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
I am pretty sure that SPL rules are that you can, like in England, bring in emergency loans if keepers are injured long term. We also have a young keeper in Thomas Flynn, who I have seen more than a few times, who Hibernian deemed good enough to give a pro contract to, so in that regard, is good enough to come in and do a job. Five keepers, four of whom on a very very good salary, is quite ridiculous. Do Celtic, Rangers, Dundee Utd or anyone else for that matter have that many. I will stand by the comment that there were and still are areas of the squad that take priority over goalkeeping.
-
07-05-2010 12:45 PM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Personally, I wouldn't have him anywhere our goal.
What happens if he has another complete nightmare and/or behaves in the same way? Sunday is our Cup Final FFS!
-
07-05-2010 12:49 PM #21
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
So do Dundee United and Hearts. Motherwell have 4.
Might be others as well - I only looked at the other top 6 sides.
Our goalkeeping position was a priority and he's tried to sort it - unfortunately our top 2 keepers are both injured leaving our 3rd choice and Maka. I think the young lad's out on loan?
-
07-05-2010 12:52 PM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 01:02 PM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 01:02 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 01:04 PM #25
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We'll be down to 3 + 1 apprentice at the end of the season so pretty much on a par with the others?
-
07-05-2010 01:12 PM #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
07-05-2010 01:18 PM #27
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Still happy we've got goalies and cover now though. I know we've got 4 but Maka is obviously not in his plans and is probably only still here as noone came in for him in January and he's decided to see his contract out. We'll be down to 3 next year.
One problem we have with it is all 3 keepers appear to be of a similar standard (and no obvious no. 1) and as soon as one makes a mistake there are cries to change the keeper.
-
07-05-2010 01:21 PM #28This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteFollow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
07-05-2010 01:24 PM #29
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- Age
- 46
- Posts
- 26,871
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Happy about that that laddie's a bombscare.
-
07-05-2010 01:29 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks