I have long advocated that football should drag itself out of the 19th, never mind the 20th century, and do away once and for all with grass pitches. Every season since football began games have been reduced to lotteries and/or cancelled because of the insistence on playing on grass.
Technology now allows us to play on all-weather artificial surfaces. Yet there are too many both within and without football who perpetuate the idea that somehow football is better on grass. I wouldn't say it is better, but would say it is different.
Artificial surfaces are conducive to a more technical, skillful and faster football. I believe that the universal introduction of artificial surfaces would lead to a significant increase in the standards of the players and the quality of the product on offer:ending the days of mere "cloggers" and those "pub-teams" who thrive and benefit from seeing their more skillful opponents brought down to their level in wars of attrition on quagmire pitches in the depths of winter.
I also believe that the introduction of artificial surfaces would allow every supporter to be entertained at every game and not just those games during the early and latter part of a season.
Results 1 to 26 of 26
-
30-03-2010 08:59 PM #1
Time to bring pitches into the 21st century
Last edited by noseyhibby; 30-03-2010 at 09:17 PM.
-
30-03-2010 09:03 PM #2
If they are now legal i cant understand why Hamilton ripped theirs up when they got promoted. Time for Hibs to lead the way again.
-
30-03-2010 09:13 PM #3This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
30-03-2010 09:14 PM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-03-2010 09:29 PM #5This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
30-03-2010 09:34 PM #6This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
30-03-2010 10:58 PM #7
I do believe that Hibs have looked at the Desso GrassMaster system used in places such as Croke Park and the Emirates Stadium where the pitch is a mix of synthetic and natural grass, and results in a very good playing surface that is almost unaffected by weather like we had this past winter. Only problem I think is cost, not a cheap option, but it would mean that the pitch wouldn't have to be relayed every season. See wikipedia article here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desso_GrassMaster
-
30-03-2010 11:57 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-03-2010 12:03 AM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
They werent interested so im lead to believe. I think the artifical pitch could be a good idea, maybe lead to less bookings/sending off for our players from silly tackles.
-
31-03-2010 12:42 AM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-03-2010 12:51 AM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Wish I'd read this thread first!
-
31-03-2010 01:45 AM #12
BMO field in Toronto was built about 4 years ago with a synthetic surface, this week they are laying a new grass surface at a cost of about $3 million.
Players say that artificial fields play havoc with the leg joints, never played on it myself but it seems that there is a push to go back to natural grass.
-
31-03-2010 02:32 AM #13
I train/teach association football (and play American football) on the new fully synth pitches, seems fine to me. Only thing I can think of is it may have problems will quick twisting or sliding as the "grass" wont give? I never seem to have any problems (usually because I have already been turned inside out by the opposition forward!)
-
31-03-2010 08:22 AM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
we (the beers) play on 3,4 & 5G pitches more than grass pitches now and ive never ever thought twice about slide tackling because of the artificial surface. Its not any sorer than sliding on dry grass.
any professional player who wont tackle incase they get a wee skint knee shouldnt be in that profession IMO.
something needs to change because the standard of football at ER is bad enough without the pitch making it even worse..... these new artificial surfaces or the desso grassmaster are the only way forward.
-
31-03-2010 09:43 AM #15
- Join Date
- May 2008
- Posts
- 119
Having just played on the artificial surface down at Ainslie Park I would have to disagree, as good as the surface is to play on its wreaks havoc with your joints and can cause all sorts of injuries with muolded studs getting caught on the "sticky" surface.
-
31-03-2010 10:39 AM #16
Instead of diving into all the clubs changing pitches,
we could still consider changing the football season from Mar - Oct, and play on grass.
Just IMHO.
-
31-03-2010 12:11 PM #17This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
We don't have a climate good enough to support winter football to the standard we all want to see. If we don't make the switch to summer football then a serious look at artificial surfaces has to be the next step.
-
31-03-2010 12:17 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I play in goals and regularly train/play on 3G pitches wearing shorts and a short sleeve shirt. I have absolutely no problem diving about on it and rarely have any cuts/burns. Any that i do have are no worse than you would get on a dry pitch in summer. The only problem i have is it makes a horrendous mess of my gloves and i have to change them 7 or 8 times a season now as opposed to 3 or 4 before.
-
31-03-2010 12:19 PM #19
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-03-2010 12:23 PM #20
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Age
- 49
- Posts
- 27,490
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
For me the new pitches should be looked at. Football should be played during the winter months but there's no reason we could not ensure the pitches are up to scratch to cope with it.
-
31-03-2010 12:30 PM #21
Grass is the material 21st century material Mr Nosey. It is your ideas that are out of date having their origins in a petrochemical soon to be bygone era. It is formed using energy straight from the sun and fresh air. It renews and repairs itself if treated properly. It is clean green and helps to remove some of the CO2 that you old fashioned, outmoded and generally senile thinkers would have us wiped out by.
-
31-03-2010 12:34 PM #22
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 5,253
Summer football played on grass.
Winter football, wind, rain and pitches, IMO are one of the main factors for pretty poor overall technique in Scotland.
We're too busy trying to take a first touch to get the ball under control before passing and with the pace of the game and players closing down we feel the need to get rid of it as quickly as possible.
-
31-03-2010 12:44 PM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Thanks - I was trying to remember the name of that system yesterday.
It IS expensive to maintain, I know, but it might very well pay its way in the long run.
I understand that the reason Hamilton lifted their synthetic was simply to avoid argy-bargy from those who run the SPL. They'd played 4 seasons in the SFL on it without any problems, and had developed a deserved reputation for playing passing positive football in the process.
The physical aspects of the game have already been killed off in most parts of the world, I'd say. The US insistence that 'sawker' is a game for schoolkids and women has done the deed. The old-fashioned game's beyond saving, I guess.
Why they couldn't have done what hockey's done and had one set of rules for the men letting them kick lumps out of one another, and another for the kiddies and girlies telling them to play nice, I don't know.
-
31-03-2010 12:46 PM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Awey an hug a tree ya bam!
-
31-03-2010 04:31 PM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
31-03-2010 09:32 PM #26
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Posts
- 1,978
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Granted, none of us are professional players, and don't have the coaching and medical staff on hand for correct stretching, but I would say that in my opinion there is a difference, albeit not as much as their used to be.
On the subject of Arsenal, Man Utd and Wembley pitches, not only do they have the plastic inserts, but they also employ lighting grids on the pitches that help the grass grow all year round, so this is also a major factor in why they look so good. I believe it's a Dutch company that supplies the technology (great for growing herbal medicine probably). However, the electrical costs are huge for this.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks