Goals / game ratio SPL

[Bob Box Fish]

Can anyone confirm what the goals / game ratio is for stokes in the SPL including both his games for us and his spell at Falkirk?

Obviously played less games but it can't be far away from boyd's ratio (I may be wrong).

Interesting to see his many he could rack up if we kept him for a few years.....

[Pedantic_Hibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Can anyone confirm what the goals / game ratio is for stokes in the SPL including both his games for us and his spell at Falkirk?

Obviously played less games but it can't be far away from boyd's ratio (I may be wrong).

Interesting to see his many he could rack up if we kept him for a few years.....

I'm guessing he's got 12 in about 17 for us whilst it was something like 14 in 16 for Falkirk.

Using those figures, you would have 26 in 33. Which, if that's the case, that is f****ng prolific.

[Hibee_Lisa]

Think its 12 in 18 or 19 games.

[iwasthere1972]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Think its 12 in 18 or 19 games.

Think it's 12 in 19 so combined with his Falkirk stats thats 26 in 35 matches.

Awesome.

[Sir David Gray]

Stokes-26 in 35 matches (A goal every 1.35 matches)
Boyd-160 in 284 matches (A goal every 1.78 matches)

Stokes has started every game for Hibs and Falkirk but Boyd has only started 213 matches for Rangers and Kilmarnock so if you take his goals per game ratio in terms of how many games he's started it's a goal every 1.33 matches.

Stokes is still up there with Boyd in terms of how prolific he is.

['Mon the Hibs]

Can always rely on FalkirkHibee getting the right detailed stats

[lapsedhibee]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Stokes has started every game for Hibs and Falkirk but Boyd has only started 213 matches for Rangers and Kilmarnock so if you take his goals per game ratio in terms of how many games he's started it's a goal every 1.33 matches.

And their respective goal ratios per minute on the park?
And Rooney's?

[iwasthere1972]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Stokes-26 in 35 matches (A goal every 1.35 matches)
Boyd-160 in 284 matches (A goal every 1.78 matches)

Stokes has started every game for Hibs and Falkirk but Boyd has only started 213 matches for Rangers and Kilmarnock so if you take his goals per game ratio in terms of how many games he's started it's a goal every 1.33 matches.

Stokes is still up there with Boyd in terms of how prolific he is.

I would guess that included in Boyd's goalscoring total there would be a fair number scored from the penaly spot. Anybody any idea how many?

[In_terms_of]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Stokes-26 in 35 matches (A goal every 1.35 matches)
Boyd-160 in 284 matches (A goal every 1.78 matches)

Stokes has started every game for Hibs and Falkirk but Boyd has only started 213 matches for Rangers and Kilmarnock so if you take his goals per game ratio in terms of how many games he's started it's a goal every 1.33 matches.

Stokes is still up there with Boyd in terms of how prolific he is.

[iwasthere1972]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well change your name then. Stop trawling the board looking for things to complain about. In terms of annoyance you're right up there.

[God Petrie]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

What's your point? He used the phrase correctly in terms of the context of the sentence.

If Boyd is worth £4m, Stokes is worth at least £6m. He is more profilic as a goalscorer and contributes much more to general build up play. Plus Stokes is only 21 whereas Boyd is 26.

[In_terms_of]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Well change your name then. Stop trawling the board looking for things to complain about. In terms of annoyance you're right up there.

[iwasthere1972]

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

What's your point? He used the phrase correctly in terms of the context of the sentence.

If Boyd is worth £4m, Stokes is worth at least £6m. He is more profilic as a goalscorer and contributes much more to general build up play. Plus Stokes is only 21 whereas Boyd is 26.