Pars back in scottish cup (MERGED)

***CallumLaidlaw*** · 21-01-2010 04:45 PM

on SSN now

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 04:46 PM

Upheld!!

May Welsh and Currie grab their second chance with both boots!!

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 04:48 PM

Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

on SSN now

Admins, Merge!!

**~~sunshine1875~~** · 21-01-2010 04:51 PM

Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

on SSN now

Is it a replay or does the original result stand?

***lapsedhibee*** · 21-01-2010 04:58 PM

Originally Posted by sunshine1875

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Is it a replay or does the original result stand?

Not sure if they've said yet. Bloke presenter on SSN just confirming that the problem was caused by an "illegible" player.

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by sunshine1875

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Is it a replay or does the original result stand?

Per Radio Scotland, it will be a replay, hence my wishes for the Hibs boys!!

**ancient hibee** · 21-01-2010 05:07 PM

Not much point in having rules then?

**jgl07** · 21-01-2010 05:11 PM

Originally Posted by lapsedhibee

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Not sure if they've said yet. Bloke presenter on SSN just confirming that the problem was caused by an "illegible" player.

Couldn't they read the team sheet?

***Jim44*** · 21-01-2010 05:18 PM

Originally Posted by jgl07

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Couldn't they read the team sheet?

Their manager said that he read the list on the morning of the match and that the banned player's name was not on it. Either he was lying or he is illiterate. Bottom line was they were out of order but to add insult to injury they also contravened some other regulations. Shocking decision which makes you wonder if some level of corruption is in the background.

***Sylar*** · 21-01-2010 05:23 PM

Absolute joke.

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 05:25 PM

Game to be played at Ochilview ..

**Hakim Sar** · 21-01-2010 05:25 PM

So henry cheats and gets away with it

Dunfermline use 2 ineligable players and fail to stick to 2 under21's in squad rule and are barely punished

The game has gone mad and as usual the SFA are absolute garbage.

Scenario - dunfermline knock out Celtic under exact same circumstances - would they get a replay? of course not

***Hibbie_Cameron*** · 21-01-2010 05:28 PM

Whats the point in punishing teams when they almost always win their appeals? Why not just make a decision and stick with it rather than backing down at almost every opportunity.

The SFA must have knew the pars would appeal so why not just let them off with it the first time round or ban them without right to appeal

***the_ginger_hibee*** · 21-01-2010 05:31 PM

Just when you thought you couldn't compromise the integrity and reputation of the scottish cup anymore.....

..this happens. I mean FFS make a decision and stick by it, or just make sure you get it right first. I honestly don't have an opinion either way, but its a complete farce from every side.

Can the SFA, SPL, SFL, DHL, WHSmiths* or whatever faceless fat cat suits that are running the show this week no take a Usain Bolt to ****? Cheers.

(*no offense to DHL & WHS)

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 05:32 PM

Originally Posted by Hibbie_Cameron

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Whats the point in punishing teams when they almost always win their appeals? Why not just make a decision and stick with it rather than backing down at almost every opportunity.

The SFA must have knew the pars would appeal so why not just let them off with it the first time round or ban them without right to appeal

More laughable is the fact they (Dunfermline) have been fined £30k but they will have revenue from the first game & now the "replay" too so in effect the gates will pay the fine ...

What a complete farce ..only in Scotland eh !!!

**jgl07** · 21-01-2010 05:34 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

More laughable is the fact they (Dunfermline) have been fined £30k but they will have revenue from the first game & now the "replay" too so in effect the gates will pay the fine ...

What a complete farce ..only in Scotland eh !!!

Aye like there will be more than 500 at the replay!

**Hainan Hibs** · 21-01-2010 05:39 PM

The people that run the game in Scotland don't have a clue and it's ridiculous muppets like Gordon Smith can hold high power jobs at the SFA. The suits at the SFA,SPL, and every other joke of an organisation running the game here couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery.

The sad thing is it won't change.

***scoopyboy*** · 21-01-2010 05:41 PM

Originally Posted by Hakim Sar

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

So henry cheats and gets away with it

Dunfermline use 2 ineligable players and fail to stick to 2 under21's in squad rule and are barely punished

The game has gone mad and as usual the SFA are absolute garbage.

Scenario - dunfermline knock out Celtic under exact same circumstances - would they get a replay? of course not

for a bonus point name the two players

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by jgl07

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Aye like there will be more than 500 at the replay!

If you read my post i said they will get the revenue from both games ..

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 05:51 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If you read my post i said they will get the revenue from both games ..

Will they, though??

This is the Cup - revenues are split evenly between the two teams after costs, is this not so??

**GreenPJ** · 21-01-2010 05:55 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

If you read my post i said they will get the revenue from both games ..

I thought Scottish Cup you had to split 50/50 the revenue. This won't cover the cost of the fine when taking into considerations other overheads.

The bigger tragedy as had been said is the SFA. Why ever make the decision to chuck them out in the first place if they are then just going to overturn on appeal. Whatever decision they come up with, bloody stick to it, they are spineless fools.

Also why on earth fine clubs in the current climate. Scottish football is ****ed enough without the SFA contributing to clubs precarious predicament. If there is a punishment due then the current climate dictates it should be something other than hard fast cash.

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 05:56 PM

Originally Posted by ancienthibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Will they, though??

This is the Cup - revenues are split evenly between the two teams after costs, is this not so??

My point is its a token fine ..a pointless fine when you consider they have the revenue from both games, at the very least it will go a long way to paying the £30k.. the fine meted out is hardly a punishment when you consider in all probability Dunfermline will go through & get up to £250k v Celtic ..

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 06:08 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

My point is its a token fine ..a pointless fine when you consider they have the revenue from both games, at the very least it will go a long way to paying the £30k.. the fine meted out is hardly a punishment when you consider in all probability Dunfermline will go through & get up to £250k v Celtic ..

Er, no!!

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 06:09 PM

Originally Posted by ancienthibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Er, no!!

Er no what ..?

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 06:11 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Er no what ..?

Cup revenue is split 50/50 between the two competing teams!!

Comprende??

**~~MSK~~** · 21-01-2010 06:15 PM

Originally Posted by ancienthibby

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Cup revenue is split 50/50 between the two competing teams!!

Comprende??

Try no act the smartarse eh ..i know fine well the revenue is split !!!!!

***.Sean.*** · 21-01-2010 06:16 PM

Replay, joke.

I dinnae care if they humped Stenny, they showed blatant disregard for the rules so the appeal should've been kicked into touch.

**stubru59** · 21-01-2010 06:16 PM

Precedent set here. Play your ineligible star striker, and if its noticed, claim his name was not on the original team sheet.

Tell them the failure to name the required number of under 2'1s was all the fault of the lassie in the office.

Furthermore, explain the alteration to the team sheet after it had been handed to the ref as just one of those things.

Why suspend a player if you can get away with playing him anyway? Under 21 quota? Really just a guideline which you would be best to ignore.

Team sheets? Nobody cares who plays and when, its just a paper exercise to keep the clowns at the SFA in a job.

**ancienthibby** · 21-01-2010 06:18 PM

Originally Posted by happyhibbie

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Try no act the smartarse eh ..i know fine well the revenue is split !!!!!

So your keyboard is brain dead!

Quite obviously

***lapsedhibee*** · 21-01-2010 06:22 PM

Originally Posted by jgl07

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Couldn't they read the team sheet?

Thread: Pars back in scottish cup (MERGED)

Thread Tools

Display

Pars back in scottish cup (MERGED)

Dunfy Appeal

Similar Threads

(Yams) 18 points back, sinking towards relegation battle (merged)

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions