hibs.net Messageboard

Results 1 to 21 of 21
  1. #1
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925

    If Pars are binned for mistakes surely Arabs should be too?

    I was intrigued listening to Kenny Clark yesterday on sportscene as he got stuck into the SFA for the way they handled the Pars cup debacle.

    I thought he made some very interesting points, that many would now think there has been a miscarriage of justice. (myself included)

    At the time I thought that (as many did) the rules are the rules, but now the dust has settled I'm not so sure. KC also touched on the fact that Dundee United's dodgy Argentinian who clearly CHEATED has gone unpunished He also claims that team sheets are altered all the time. (interesting point)

    The SFA are going on about the integrity of the competition. I'm obviously missing something, I'm not so sure this is cut' n dry at the moment.
    (can anybody say if The Pars are appealing?, can't see it anywhere)

    Tam Cowan gets is 2p worth in his column today, stating that if it were the uglies who had committed the crime would they also have been shown the door? (I also think not) and by all accounts I don't think this will go away anytime soon.

    http://blogs.dailyrecord.co.uk/tamco...-+Tam+Cowan%29


  2. Log in to remove the advert

  3. #2
    AFKA SuffolkHibee ChilliEater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Currambine, Western Australia
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,742
    I seem to remember the Huns giving Bonny Ginsburg his debut in a league cup tie before his registration had gone through. They were only given a small fine.

  4. #3
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by SuffolkHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I seem to remember the Huns giving Bonny Ginsburg his debut in a league cup tie before his registration had gone through. They were only given a small fine.

    I seem to recall that vaguely My memory is not what it was

    I do recall hit first game at ER tho..

  5. #4
    AFKA SuffolkHibee ChilliEater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Currambine, Western Australia
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,742
    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I seem to recall that vaguely My memory is not what it was

    I do recall hit first game at ER tho..
    Was that 2-0, Houchen and Weir?

  6. #5
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by SuffolkHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Was that 2-0, Houchen and Weir?
    It certainly was on a glorious sunny afternoon...

  7. #6
    Don't recall Clark reinterpreting any rules when he reffed.

  8. #7
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by ancient hibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Don't recall Clark reinterpreting any rules when he reffed.

    When you see what we have got now I'll take him any day.

    He had his moments like any Ref, but better the devil you know
    I say.

  9. #8
    @hibs.net private member NORTHERNHIBBY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Last Train to Skaville
    Age
    58
    Posts
    13,417

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was intrigued listening to Kenny Clark yesterday on sportscene as he got stuck into the SFA for the way they handled the Pars cup debacle.

    I thought he made some very interesting points, that many would now think there has been a miscarriage of justice. (myself included)

    At the time I thought that (as many did) the rules are the rules, but now the dust has settled I'm not so sure. KC also touched on the fact that Dundee United's dodgy Argentinian who clearly CHEATED has gone unpunished He also claims that team sheets are altered all the time. (interesting point)

    The SFA are going on about the integrity of the competition. I'm obviously missing something, I'm not so sure this is cut' n dry at the moment.
    (can anybody say if The Pars are appealing?, can't see it anywhere)

    Tam Cowan gets is 2p worth in his column today, stating that if it were the uglies who had committed the crime would they also have been shown the door? (I also think not) and by all accounts I don't think this will go away anytime soon.

    http://blogs.dailyrecord.co.uk/tamco...-+Tam+Cowan%29

    I don't see it ever being an issue for either Rangers or Celtic because the news hacks are so obssessed to get the papers full of OF stories that it would have already been discussed. By that I mean if Woods had played for either of the OF, there would have been spurious press conference questions about if it would have weakened the team and failing that there would have been a token " My Cup heartbreak"article about him not getting to play.

  10. #9
    Left by mutual consent!
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    from the mountains
    Posts
    4,688
    Gamer IDs

    Wii Code: 666
    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I was intrigued listening to Kenny Clark yesterday on sportscene as he got stuck into the SFA for the way they handled the Pars cup debacle.

    I thought he made some very interesting points, that many would now think there has been a miscarriage of justice. (myself included)

    At the time I thought that (as many did) the rules are the rules, but now the dust has settled I'm not so sure. KC also touched on the fact that Dundee United's dodgy Argentinian who clearly CHEATED has gone unpunished He also claims that team sheets are altered all the time. (interesting point)

    The SFA are going on about the integrity of the competition. I'm obviously missing something, I'm not so sure this is cut' n dry at the moment.
    (can anybody say if The Pars are appealing?, can't see it anywhere)

    Tam Cowan gets is 2p worth in his column today, stating that if it were the uglies who had committed the crime would they also have been shown the door? (I also think not) and by all accounts I don't think this will go away anytime soon.

    http://blogs.dailyrecord.co.uk/tamco...-+Tam+Cowan%29
    How can he compare Dunfermline fielding an ineligible player with a player sticking his hand out to score a goal? From your thread heading are you saying Dundee United should be thrown out of the competition for that? What a load of pish.

  11. #10
    I think this thread is pretty ludicrous, tbh.

  12. #11
    Coaching Staff BEEJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Glasgow
    Age
    64
    Posts
    8,247
    Quote Originally Posted by LeithenHibby View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    (can anybody say if The Pars are appealing?
    I would have said 'nauseating' would be a better word!

    Boom, boom.


  13. #12
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by ArabHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How can he compare Dunfermline fielding an ineligible player with a player sticking his hand out to score a goal? From your thread heading are you saying Dundee United should be thrown out of the competition for that? What a load of pish.
    Don't shoot the messenger

    He (KC) touched on the integrity of the competition and from a legal point of view. In both cases, it's CHEATING and in a court of law, he has a very good point IMHO.

    He also stated that he would argue Pars case until he was blue in the face.

    So no, it's not Pish as you so delicately put it.

  14. #13
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by BEEJ View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I would have said 'nauseating' would be a better word!

    Boom, boom.

    will they appeal then?

  15. #14
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by ArabHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How can he compare Dunfermline fielding an ineligible player with a player sticking his hand out to score a goal? From your thread heading are you saying Dundee United should be thrown out of the competition for that? What a load of pish.

    The thread heading has a question mark, not my heading Tam Cowan.

  16. #15
    Dunf played someone who had been suspended.

    They did not have the required number of under 21's on their team list. And they altered their team list less than an hour before kick-off.

    Call it crass stupidity, an oversight, or plain ignorance, they broke the rules which are applicable to all teams. If the SFA don't apply those rules, what is the point in suspending someone?

    What is the point in having a team list if whose on that list is neither here nor there.

    Think of it like this. Your team is in the semi-final of the Scottish cup. The oppositions star striker is suspended for that game.

    They go ahead and play him anyway, thinking any fine will be more than covered should they go through to the final.

    Do we just ignore it because a ref in another game failed to spot a handball which led to a goal?

    Not a big fan of the SFA but on this occasion they have got it right.

  17. #16
    @hibs.net private member Leithenhibby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,925
    Quote Originally Posted by stubru59 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Dunf played someone who had been suspended.

    They did not have the required number of under 21's on their team list. And they altered their team list less than an hour before kick-off.

    Call it crass stupidity, an oversight, or plain ignorance, they broke the rules which are applicable to all teams. If the SFA don't apply those rules, what is the point in suspending someone?

    What is the point in having a team list if whose on that list is neither here nor there.

    Think of it like this
    . Your team is in the semi-final of the Scottish cup. The oppositions star striker is suspended for that game.

    They go ahead and play him anyway, thinking any fine will be more than covered should they go through to the final.

    Do we just ignore it because a ref in another game failed to spot a handball which led to a goal?

    Not a big fan of the SFA but on this occasion they have got it right.

    Or this, winning 4-0 make a sub.
    The sub has little, if any influence on the final out come In fact he has a hand in conceding the consolation goal.

    What KC was hitting at was the fact the punishment didn't fit the crime.

    Sledgehammer / Walnut.

  18. #17
    @hibs.net private member Hibby_Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Age
    42
    Posts
    1,756
    Blog Entries
    1
    Agree there is no way on earth either of Old Firm would face such punishments if it happened to them. Imagine one of the 'great' old firm clubs not being allowed into the next round of the showpiece cup. In addition, there is also no way I think that would happen cause of a) the media and b) old firm have so many more folk involved in club im sure and pars have prob been found to to be a bit amateurish here!

    I do think it is very excessive punishment on Pars and a replay should have been called for. I bet some of the other minor team sheets offences do happen more often and are just waved away. Think the SFA just want to be seen to make an example of them.

    Will be curious to see if they get anywhere with their appeal...

  19. #18
    @hibs.net private member blackpoolhibs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Posts
    57,384
    Quote Originally Posted by ArabHibee View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    How can he compare Dunfermline fielding an ineligible player with a player sticking his hand out to score a goal? From your thread heading are you saying Dundee United should be thrown out of the competition for that? What a load of pish.
    Exactly, next he will be saying Maraddona's goal should never have been allowed.

  20. #19
    @hibs.net private member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    8,155
    The Pars are unquestionably guilty as charged of breaking the rules - the fact appears to be though, that this is down to gross incompetence in their management set-up as opposed to any kind of intentional cheating.

    The SFA's position appears to be dictated by precedent - their standard response to this kind of infraction in past Scottish Cups has been (as far as I know) to expel the guilty club from the competition. That being the case it's very hard to argue against their decision - even if it seems harsh, at least they're showing consistency in the application of the rules.

    Clubs in future (just as Dunfermline should have this time round) will know exactly what to expect if they field an inelligable player.

  21. #20
    @hibs.net private member Jones28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tinto Hill
    Age
    31
    Posts
    18,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Dashing Bob S View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I think this thread is pretty ludicrous, tbh.

  22. #21
    @hibs.net private member Jones28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tinto Hill
    Age
    31
    Posts
    18,386
    Pars were binned because they fielded an unregistered player.

    A Dundee Utd player scores with a handball and they should be binned too? Nahh

Similar Threads

  1. Who should have been binned earlier?
    By blackpoolhibs in forum hibs.net Main Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 09-01-2010, 06:53 PM
  2. (NHC) Megson Binned
    By down-the-slope in forum hibs.net Main Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 31-12-2009, 11:25 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
hibs.net ©2020 All Rights Reserved
- Mobile Leaderboard (320x50) - Leaderboard (728x90)