....on Murray right at the end of the match.
Was that not the epitome of a red card offence or am I being over the top.
Murray was away from him and he lunged in from behind with no attempt to get anywhere near the ball. From where I was sitting it could have easily caused serious injury. Anyone have a different view in the ground where it didn't look that bad?
The two head butts were reds, but the fact that this was only a yellow seems disproportionate to me, albeit I may not be completely impartial...
Results 1 to 30 of 32
Thread: Stewarts tackle...
-
04-01-2010 09:14 PM #1
Stewarts tackle...
-
04-01-2010 09:17 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Brutal tackle which 9 times out of 10 would have saw red IMO
-
04-01-2010 09:18 PM #3
If Murrays was a red card at parkhead a couple of seasons ago, then that deserved the same.
-
04-01-2010 09:22 PM #4
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Taif, Saudi Arabia
- Posts
- 1,208
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Hibs had just done the same thing 2 minutes earlier.
The ref should have gave us the advantage and not blow his whistle straight away...
-
04-01-2010 09:26 PM #5
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Posts
- 95
the ref bottled it and should have played advantage and then booked him, stokes was through on goal !!!
-
04-01-2010 09:57 PM #6
Never a red in a million years even though I was screaming for one at the time.
The type of tackle that Ian Murray has made plenty times in his career!!
-
04-01-2010 10:01 PM #7
I read the thread title and thought he had teamed up with Nade. I was expecting pics.
-
04-01-2010 10:05 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Fairly sure McBride was booked for the same sort of tackle not long before.
An experienced tackle you could call it. Well worth taking the booking for.
As stated, Murray and others know when to take a booking for the team, nothing wrong with using their experience.
-
04-01-2010 10:48 PM #9This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
04-01-2010 10:54 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The only reason Richmond didn't send him off was because he couldn't be arsed with all the inevitable conspiracy theory paranoid whinging the jumbos would be bleating for months to come.
-
04-01-2010 11:00 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I was right in line with it, he saw Murray was getting away from him and dived in to trip him up before he got away, a tackle you see in almost every game.
-
04-01-2010 11:49 PM #12This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
When you hear refs talking about trying to not get the book out early in a derby or an OF match - WTF!! The rules of the game don't change because it's rivals playing!
Would love to see a ref take the same approach in a derby as they do in any other match, and then watch the number of bookings/red cards the Yams pick up.Follow the Hibs podcast, Longbangers, on Twitter (@longbangers)
https://longbangers.hubwave.net
-
05-01-2010 06:37 AM #13
he's an animal. The only way Hearts get points is by their brut force bullying.
-
05-01-2010 07:09 AM #14
It doesn't deserve to be credited with the term "tackle".
Cynical hack, maybe.
-
05-01-2010 07:15 AM #15
Similar to Lee Miller's kick at Zuma, he had a petulant kick at Liam Miller (i think it was) as well, which should have been a yellow. He should have had two bookings
the pr!ck!!! The refs seem more reluctant to book him now since his hissy fit at Hamilton!
-
05-01-2010 10:32 AM #16
A straight red imho, and the look on his face said it all as he was expecting it, dirty ginger heed fud
-
05-01-2010 11:04 AM #17
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 85
100% Red Card
There's no doubt with this one. Regardless of who's done what in the past, this was a cynical tackle from behind, with no attempt to get the ball. McManus was, correctly, sent off against Hearts for same, except he came in from the side. On Sun, ref should have played advantage and then sent Stewart off. For what it's worth, I didn't see another tackle on Sun as blatant as this, from either side.
-
05-01-2010 11:09 AM #18
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Age
- 51
- Posts
- 414
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 11:09 AM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 11:13 AM #20
I don't really care if it was red or yellow. Arguments could be placed for both (and they have already in this thread) but I was seriously fuming that play was stopped with us having possesion and in a good posisition to have an effort at goal.
I could have ripped the ref's face off at that point.
-
05-01-2010 11:31 AM #21
It should have been a yellow card.
Only tackles from behind, which endanger the opponent are considered serious foul play.
Stewart tripped Ian Murray. Trips happen all over the field and aren't considered as dangerous.
Law 12
A player, substitute or substituted player is dismissed from the field of play and shown the red card if he/she commits any of the following offences:
Serious foul play
Violent conduct
Use of abusive language and/or gestures
Spitting at an opponent or any other person
Denying the opposing team a goal or an obvious goalscoring opportunity by deliberately handling the ball (this does not apply to a goalkeeper inside his/her own penalty area)
Denying an obvious goalscoring opportunity to an opponent moving towards the player’s goal by an offence punishable by a free kick or a penalty kick (known as a professional foul)
Receiving a second caution (yellow card) in the same match
Decision 4
A tackle that endangers the safety of an opponent must be sanctioned as
serious foul play.
However, given that it wasn't serious foul play, the referee should have played advantage.
Advantage should not be applied in situations involving serious foul play unless
there is a clear subsequent opportunity to score a goal. The referee shall send off the player guilty of serious foul play when the ball is next out of play.
-
-
05-01-2010 11:40 AM #23
Violent conduct
If a player takes a kick at somebody in an off the ball incident then that's deemed to be violent conduct and is a straight red.
Stewart was nowhere near the ball and had no intention of playing it. His sole aim was to ground Murray so he should have been sent off IMHO.
And he's a fud!
-
05-01-2010 11:52 AM #24This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 11:57 AM #25
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 883
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 11:58 AM #26
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 883
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 12:02 PM #27This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 12:04 PM #28
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 883
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
05-01-2010 12:12 PM #29
I was more bothered about the failure of Richmond to play advantage as we had a two v one when he stopped the play.
Last edited by 12AlbionPlace; 05-01-2010 at 01:36 PM. Reason: double negative
-
05-01-2010 12:19 PM #30This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Bollox!
Log in to remove the advert |
Similar Threads
-
Mikey Stewarts yellow card
By Www1875hfc in forum hibs.net Main ForumReplies: 24Last Post: 03-01-2010, 08:55 PM
Bookmarks