Seen him a few times too many now,he was dreadful tonight gets caught out time and time again and his positioning is shocking. The guy is just never going to be good enough am afraid,wouldnt be surpirsed to see him joining Mcneil in the lower leagues soon, because his defending belongs their
Results 1 to 30 of 85
Thread: Hanlon Not good enough
-
22-09-2009 11:21 PM #1
Hanlon Not good enough
-
22-09-2009 11:21 PM #2This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
22-09-2009 11:25 PM #3
He was absolutely ****ing dreadful, and not for the first time. He's cost us points and games more than once, tonight may not have been his fault mind, but his performance was not good enough. He is slow, has a poor touch, is terrible positionally and cannot defend to save himself.
It is time someone else was given their chance.
-
22-09-2009 11:26 PM #4This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
22-09-2009 11:26 PM #5
Definitely Nade.
Hanlon is being asked to play his position in a way he's probably never been asked before by pushing forward so much. I think he does the attacking part very well but needs to work on his concentration in defence.
Young players only improve with games and I think Hanlon will get them under Hughes because he sees a player with potential.
-
-
-
22-09-2009 11:30 PM #8This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
22-09-2009 11:32 PM #9
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 407
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
he is a young player finding his feet
has played some cracking games, there is no way we can start laying our faults on him.
Dont think for a second that esp. the young players dont read these forums
young players look for help when things are not going right , he was was getting hee haw help tonight. The guy is trying to learn his trade FFS
-
22-09-2009 11:33 PM #10This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
I don't see what harm giving Stevenson his chance can do. The argument that he can't win a header is meaningless given the fact Hanlon can't either.
-
22-09-2009 11:33 PM #11This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Behave
p.s Do you know more than us ??Last edited by Riordans Boots; 22-09-2009 at 11:35 PM.
-
22-09-2009 11:33 PM #12
I was not at the game tonight, but think Hanlon is one for the future. He is playing now though, and has done ok so far this season. A big problem we have is both full backs are not full backs, and certainly not the kind of full backs that Yogi wants to play his system. Mixu persisted in that bloody stupid diamond formation, i hope Hughes is not going to do the same.
We dont have the players to play 4-3-3, and until such times as we do, we should go to a normal 4-4-2.
-
22-09-2009 11:34 PM #13
Ok hope you remember this in a couple of years when Hanlon playing for someone like Arbroath
-
22-09-2009 11:34 PM #14This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show QuoteThis is how it feels
-
22-09-2009 11:35 PM #15
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 1,194
It wasn't the young players who let us down tonight.
-
22-09-2009 11:35 PM #16
I agree Hanlon does not have it yet to be first choice left back. I would like to see Hogg come back into centre half (hoping being dropped has gave him a kick up the arse) and bring Murray in at left back. I would also like to see Riordan dropped for the next game, and start either Galbraith or Benji.
-
22-09-2009 11:54 PM #17
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 24
No relation by the way but I don't see why Hanlon's getting so much stick on here to be honest. Didn't have a good game but made a couple of good tackles and was no worse that certain folk tonight, the most obvious being Bamba who quite obviously didn't want to be there.
-
22-09-2009 11:58 PM #18This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Ok paul
-
23-09-2009 12:05 AM #19This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Paul Hanlon captained the Scotland U18 team and has already been capped at U21 level. Last year he was on a months loan at St. Johnstone, who then tried to extend it. So, Yogi, Derek McInnes and the coaches of our national set up all seem to rate him as a player.
-
23-09-2009 12:22 AM #20This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Did you see his goal against Brechin??
-
23-09-2009 12:23 AM #21This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
On Hanlon though,even for his tender age his defending is naive beyond belief and will never be good enough for hibs only my expert opinion mind dueLast edited by Zemmama19; 23-09-2009 at 12:35 AM.
-
23-09-2009 12:29 AM #22This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
The problem i have is he is a defender who cant defend.Its his tackling,positioning,passing,strength and heading that are his main downfalls, all very much essential if your going to be a top class defender which hanlon will never be
-
23-09-2009 12:35 AM #23This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Last edited by marinello59; 23-09-2009 at 08:19 AM.
-
23-09-2009 12:49 AM #24
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
Hopefully Yogi (if he is true to form) will drop this over rated, under performing excuse of a full back after not only tonight's "performance" but the last few games. McInnes (as at the weekend) got it spot on by targetting the full backs and Hanlon in particular. He put Deuchar on Hanlon tonight, and the only header the young man won all night was one in their penalty box when the linesman had flagged for offside. Poor poor player and he is flattered by these pundits and detractors who think he is a good player. Slow, ponderous, jumps statically, never ever takes a chance going forward, and constantly constantly gets dragged out of position (to the centre half position) and leaves gaps on his own flank. At fault FULLY for all three goals tonight (had the chance to clear the third however again played like a frightened rabbit and fluffed his clearance). Stevenson for me, is the better player, more composed, and better on the deck. An utterly gutless show from all on display but Hanlon will make a player when I become a priest.
-
23-09-2009 01:05 AM #25This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-09-2009 01:13 AM #26
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Location
- Edinburgh
- Posts
- 9,134
The fact that on Saturday, Grainger from kick off swung an aimless 40 yard ball over towards Hanlon said it all. Weak link, cannot jump, cannot attack a ball, and is slower than a slow thing going foward and defending. Deuchar must have thought it was Christmas the amount of times he was using his body, strength and height against such a lightweight fullback. Fair play to St J and McInnes.....they deserved it, but Hanlon was the weakest of weakest links
-
23-09-2009 05:57 AM #27
I feel sorry for him and maccormack they are never full backs they are both centre halfs. Cause maccormack looked lost last night at right back
-
23-09-2009 06:14 AM #28
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 5,025
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
-
23-09-2009 06:15 AM #29
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Age
- 41
- Posts
- 5,025
This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
Another one who knows **** all about football I see.
-
23-09-2009 06:31 AM #30
Hanlon is what, 19? It seems we pride ourselves on bringing young players though our system to the first team and then can't wait to slaughter them when they get there. We are a strange support at times.
Every gimmick hungry yob,
Digging gold from rock and roll
Grabs the mic to tell us,
He'll die before he's sold.
Log in to remove the advert |
Bookmarks