The Ultimate Poll - Maka or Stack?

**Hibs90** · 20-09-2009 01:10 PM

For once and for all, lets get this decided.

Mak for me.

***CallumLaidlaw*** · 20-09-2009 01:19 PM

to be honest, at present, I feel it has to be Stack. Iam never confident when the ball is passed back to Maka. He may come out to collect more crosses than stack, but he has tendencies to drop them/flap at them.
I dont see the problem with Stacks distribution. He at least gets the ball forward, and doesnt take an age to release the ball. Maka spends about a minute contemplating what he is gonna do, absolutely no urgency from him.

Maka is still young, and will be a good keeper, but I think he needs to learn a bit more and bide his time.

**~~Dunbar Hibee~~** · 20-09-2009 01:26 PM

as much as i love maka, he makes too many mistakes and Stack looks a safe keeper.

**Hibee_Lisa** · 20-09-2009 01:28 PM

I prefer Stack.

**steviehfc** · 20-09-2009 01:36 PM

I feel more confident with Stack in goals than i do with Maka.

**RickyS** · 20-09-2009 01:46 PM

Originally Posted by steviehfc

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

I feel more confident with Stack in goals than i do with Maka.

**Seany HFC 7-0** · 20-09-2009 03:43 PM

Enough is enough of this debate

Stack for me anyway

***Scouse Hibee*** · 20-09-2009 03:44 PM

Originally Posted by Dunbar Hibee

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

as much as i love maka, he makes too many mistakes and Stack looks a safe keeper.

100% Agree, far too many previous mistakes from Maka.

**Hainan Hibs** · 20-09-2009 03:44 PM

Maka by a mile.

**lEXO** · 20-09-2009 03:46 PM

Either of them.Did,nt vote cos that option was,nt given. Lets keep this Maka/Stack ball rolling.

**mim** · 20-09-2009 03:47 PM

Maka is far from perfect, but what I've seen so far of Stack is that he is at best average and Maka is the better long term option.

**down-the-slope** · 20-09-2009 03:51 PM

Originally Posted by mike_in_munich

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Maka is far from perfect, but what I've seen so far of Stack is that he is at best average and Maka is the better long term option.

**maturehibby** · 20-09-2009 04:34 PM

Both seem to suffer from that disease about venturing out into open spaces EG the06/12/ 18 yard line.
But Maka to me is the better shot stopper

**~~Hibercelona~~** · 20-09-2009 04:38 PM

I'd have Maka and Stack at the club over Foster and Boruc anyday.

**hibsbollah** · 20-09-2009 04:42 PM

I think we have two decent keepers

Voted Maka though.

**Hibee_Rab** · 20-09-2009 04:45 PM

Exactly half and half at the mo haha

**iwasthere1972** · 20-09-2009 04:47 PM

Originally Posted by Meeko

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

For once and for all, lets get this decided.

Mak for me.

Think it's still too early to guage whether Stack is better than Maka. Maybe once he has another 6 games under his belt I will be able to vote.

***Golden Bear*** · 20-09-2009 05:40 PM

Personally I think that it's time this stupid "debate" was put to bed.

For weeks on end, the now statutory Maka threads have appeared on Hibs net and it is patently obvious that we're going round in circles as the same discussion points/arguments are being brought up over and over again.

Entrenched views are held and nothing will change some posters opinions so I suggest we all get behind whichever keeper it is that currently holds down the jersey.

So how about it? ---------- a wee truce? --------- maybe we all could give it a try?

**Luna_Asylum** · 20-09-2009 08:53 PM

Originally Posted by finhq031

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Personally I think that it's time this stupid "debate" was put to bed.

For weeks on end, the now statutory Maka threads have appeared on Hibs net and it is patently obvious that we're going round in circles as the same discussion points/arguments are being brought up over and over again.

Entrenched views are held and nothing will change some posters opinions so I suggest we all get behind whichever keeper it is that currently holds down the jersey.

So how about it? ---------- a wee truce? --------- maybe we all could give it a try?

correct but the dude on the horse is not giving out the truce vibe

**lEXO** · 20-09-2009 09:00 PM

[QUOTE=finhq031;2181493]Personally I think that it's time this stupid "debate" was put to bed.

For weeks on end, the now statutory Maka threads have appeared on Hibs net and it is patently obvious that we're going round in circles as the same discussion points/arguments are being brought up over and over again.

Entrenched views are held and nothing will change some posters opinions so I suggest we all get behind whichever keeper it is that currently holds down the jersey.

So how about it? ---------- a wee truce? --------- maybe we all could give it a try?[/QUOTE
How dare you come on here with your radical ideas of supporting both our goalies.Next you will be wanting us to sing and stuff.Down with this sort of thing

**~~Hibercelona~~** · 20-09-2009 09:04 PM

Come on your Maka lovers.... get those votes in!

***...WentToMowAnSPL*** · 20-09-2009 09:06 PM

Originally Posted by wee_hibee

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Come on your Maka lovers.... get those votes in!

Absolutely ! surely the sane majority must speak out

***rainman*** · 21-09-2009 03:47 AM

Neither player is going to get a fiur crack of the whip until our support accepts that most keepers make mistakes.

We're not going to have a Goram or a Leighton. At the same time, if they make a mistake, it doesn't mean we have another Si Brown or Zibbi.

I voted maka because i love the big streak of piss.

**RoYO!** · 21-09-2009 08:34 AM

one thing we can say for sure is that if maka was a hertz player.....

he'd be getting a game upfront by now

***blackpoolhibs*** · 21-09-2009 08:37 AM

Well we have a winner, Stack way in front.

**Tha Cabbage Kid** · 21-09-2009 09:41 AM

how can you have a debate with one keeper who has had a good chance in the team for a few seasons to someoone who has played 3 or 4 games???

dont agree with this poll. sorry

**~~Hibercelona~~** · 21-09-2009 10:18 AM

Originally Posted by RoYO!

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

one thing we can say for sure is that if maka was a hertz player.....

he'd be getting a game upfront by now

One think we can say for sure...

If Big Mac played for Hearts... Nade would never have him out of his sights.

**H1bs6H3arts2 FC** · 21-09-2009 10:45 AM

I'd have the top half of stack & the bottom half of Maka !!!

***SteveHFC*** · 21-09-2009 10:52 AM

Stack for me.

**~~TornadoHibby~~** · 21-09-2009 11:10 AM

Originally Posted by mike_in_munich

This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote

Maka is far from perfect, but what I've seen so far of Stack is that he is at best average and Maka is the better long term option.

Mike!

Also far too early for a meaningful opinion "poll" amongst the fans who actually see the guys playing live as opposed to those that listen to radio comments or pay heed to what they read on here as the justification for voting!

Complete waste of time IMO and therefore I didn't "vote"!