Does he belong in jail or are his civil liberties being breached?
Printable View
Does he belong in jail or are his civil liberties being breached?
Reporting on a case where there are restrictions until after the verdicts. I think. Another Asian grooming gang.
I wonder why there are restrictions.
Tommy Robinson "fans" march to Whitehall in protest at his arrest . I despair.
Odious little creep.
Have people actually watched his videos or just jumping onto the "racist/fascist" bandwagon?
The man is an absolute *****
Why isn't he chasing around kicking up **** about white paedophilia which is much more prevalent than the few high profile cases involving Muslims? Answer is because it's not the paedophilia that disgusts him. The man is a racist cock.
The "reporting" of the case may give the defendants a lifeline in claiming a mistrial.
Well done Stephen you fascist welt.
He had a suspended sentence for filming at a court. Then he does it again. It’s a fair cop.
Reporting restrictions: young women have been raped. They are vulnerable as victims of crime.... right to a fair trial, a second reason. There’s probably more.
Robinson isn’t a victim and the trial isn’t a conspiracy.
Roseanne Barr is getting involved on Twitter, #tagging Robinson & pedogate, she also tagged @POTUS & @nigel_farage.
Dunno why she's being so vocal on a guy and a story so far from her home but she has 1000's of followers so her brain fart posts will reach a healthy audience,,,,
Maybe after the trial but before is not a good idea: it can compromise a fair trial by influencing a jury or undermining the prosecution or defence’s case, release details about often vulnerable victims and suspects (who’ve yet to be proven guilty) etc.
It’s not in the public interest until it’s done.
I’m talking about the exposing of rape gangs in a general sense.
The post i quotes said he should be chasing higher profile cases that aren’t muslim.
I said it doesn’t matter what paedophile ring is exposed to me.
I do appreciate what you are saying however
The post you quoted says nothing of the kind. He was out on license (suspended sentence) and shouldn't have been anywhere near the court and he knows it. The judge was absolutely correct to send him down.
As for the mainstream media 'not covering the case', it's one more day in a lengthy trial and nothing to report. He describes himself as a reporter but that's nonsense. He's just a self serving racist trying to get himself and his warped views more air time.
Why doesn't he report about the parliamentary paedophile gangs? The football paedophile gangs? The celebrity paedophile gangs? The North Wales paedophile network? Plymouth paedophile gang? Nottingham care home gangs? Manchester and Islington children's homes paedophile scandals and hundreds of other organised paedophile groups?
I'll tell you Why, it's because it's not the paedophilia that disgusts him, it's the race of this particular group of paedophiles that irks him and he's trying to associate Islam with paedophilia to further his own seedy agenda. He's a racist **** who has now put the trial of these ****ing rats in danger because he's now possibly influenced the fairness of the trial process. He should go to jail if he can't abide by the laws of our legal system.
And as i said any exposure of ANY rapist gang is a good thing.
I’m not overly bothered what the reasoning behind a rape gang being exposed if they are being exposed.
I’m not defending his actions surrounding this case.
“Why isn't he chasing around kicking up **** about white paedophilia which is much more prevalent than the few high profile cases involving Muslims? Answer is because it's not the paedophilia that disgusts him. The man is a racist cock.” Is the post I quoted. And I stand by my point. Any rape gang exposure is a good thing.