Both clubs sited by SFA following Wednesday derby clash according to BBC sport web site.
Printable View
Both clubs sited by SFA following Wednesday derby clash according to BBC sport web site.
For the melee presumably.
Was there 3 Hibs players involved? Looked like only Kamberri with Hibs players holding him back.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's what I thought. Be interesting to see who the other two are.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
cited not sitedQuote:
Originally Posted by Lago
</pedant>
Agree Kamberi was the only Hibs player showing aggression.Should be Hibs defence.
Hearts have the same.Quote:
Notice of Complaint | Hibernian FC
Tuesday 6 November 2018
Alleged Party in Breach: Hibernian FC
Match: Heart of Midlothian FC v Hibernian FC
Date: 31 October 2018
Competition: Scottish Premiership
Disciplinary Rules allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 204 - Where three or more players and/or members of Team Staff from one team are involved in a confrontation with opposing players and/or members of Team Staff of the opposing team during and/or directly after a match.
Principal hearing date: 15 November 2018
Response date: 12 November 2018
Good that the SFA are picking up on the important stuff that happened in that match :rolleyes:
If that’s actually a charge then there should be one handed out after nearly every game. Bit of handbags and they’re pulling out charges.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
:greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by green day
Good to see the SFA tackling the big issues from that evening.
We knew what he meant though :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Are they firing Andrew Dallas?Quote:
Originally Posted by B.H.F.C
That would solve A LOT of future issues
:agree:Quote:
Originally Posted by green day
I take it this new rule is the 1st time it's been applied.
The shame game, Deary f***ing me.
No way. Slivka, Bartley and McGregor were trying to hold him back and Bartley spoke to the ref. On the other hand Smith, Dunne & Garuccio went in mob handed. Smith ran 30 yards to get involved, Dunne was aggressively pointing his finger at Kamberi's face and Garuccio gave Flo a right shove.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Its bollocks, not being funny but for a derby the kamberi incident was pretty "meh".Quote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
What are they playing at?
Our charge doesn’t hold water and I hope we defend ourselves rigourously.
Would the SFA be involved in the other incidents at the moment, or are they a matter for the police?
I'd agree from recollection that we should get our case thrown out as only Kamberi got involved in anything, but Hearts may have something to answer for their involvement.
Playing at 'trying it out and deciding it's not a good plan'. This decision will of course be made before the next Old Firm match.Quote:
Originally Posted by green day
Incredible absolutely nothing in that. If that was a rule administered correctly Hearts would be up every second week.Quote:
Originally Posted by green day
My thoughts would be 2 fingers to Lennon.Quote:
Originally Posted by green day
Other incidents are for the SPFL rather than SFA I thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by danhibees1875
No your quite right my old English teacher would be very disappointed :agree:Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
You're quite right. Not 'your'. Your English teacher is absolutely dumbstruck.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lago
Yip maybe so but as I said disappointed English teacher always drumming it into you CHECK your work.:greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by MackTheKnife
Reminds me of all the players being retrospectively yellow carded in the Souness debut.
It included George McCluskey who was the victim of his assault, Mark Fulton who was lying on the ground after Ally McCoist had sneaked up from behind and punched him and Alan Rough who never left his box.
Wonder why the hearts full back hasn't been cited for trying to elbow Boyle then kicking him off the ball.
:cool2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilson
Apostrophes how could I forget.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilson
:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lago
No question mark. He's just handed in his jotters.:greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Lago
Even for rhetorical questions???????Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
The MSM & the football authorities are an absolute joke. Anything to detract from the bigotry, hatred & sectarianism on show at the uglies' games every week. I wonder how the 2 guys stabbed outside Ibrox are doing?
You've missed a comma. :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Lago
:wink:
Like that one? :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Lago
Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
:top marks
Anyone know if this is a new rule? I expect that a few minutes of research would identify many other similar examples. Our game against Morton where Lenny & Duffy were cited is one. I'm sure we'll defend this vigorously.
Think it’s Dunne that runs 50 yards or so to get involvedQuote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
https://youtu.be/rooao7_W0Y8
I'm still not sure what Kamberi's "crime" actually was. How does being angry and having your own players hold you back merit any punishment ?
I give in.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
:not worth
Ok 3 falls and a submission.Quote:
Originally Posted by MackTheKnife
:not worth
This wouldn't be happening if Neil Lennon wasn't our manager - just another GFA ploy to sicken him so he packs it in !
Meanwhile, no action taken over Dallas's woeful display which was a major cause of the ill-feeling in that game !!
Pretty sure Roughie was the only player who never got booked.Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
CorrectQuote:
Originally Posted by tamig
All three of the players I mentioned won their appeal which highlighted how bad the decision was. Also couldn’t understand how Swally the sneak got away with a yellow.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamig
Because he was a hun?Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
Right enough. It was probably just a cheeky wee punch as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tamig
It is, and in 6 seconds from the time that he barges into Kamberi and starts waving his finger at him, Kamberi loses the plot and gets a 2nd yellow.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
The 6 seconds of footage is an interesting watch. Before that all the players including Kamberi are concerned for the player on the ground then Dunne comes in and flicks Kamberi's switch. None of the other Hibs players did anything wrong or aggressive for us to be cited for this incident. Bartlay and Milligan read the situation but couldn't get in quick enough before Kamberi blew his cool. He obviously wasn't trained to count to 5 when he was a kid.
The only other incident of note was when the Hamster was annoyed earlier in the half after being on the end of rough treatment. I haven't seen that incident back so can't comment further on that as regards any mellee.
A potential £10,000 fine.
The Blazers are obviously planning on a very nice Christmas doo this year.
Isn’t it Garruchio’s actions that tip Flo over the edge? I reckoned that he shoved aggressively and made some kind of comments to provoke such a strong reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So it would look like from that picture they are classing Mallan being in the general vicinity as being one of the “3 or more players”. Presumably the other one is Slivka for holding Kamberi back. Total joke.Quote:
Originally Posted by Austinho
Totally agree he did nothing to merit any card. Dunne and others did much more than he did and got no sanction.Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffers
His aggressive reaction earned him the yellow card - rightly in my opinion. If his colleagues hadn’t held him back it could have been worse.
Dunne should also have been booked for his involvement.
Of course, it should have been his first yellow as the other one was a joke. The ‘foul’ that preceded the stramash was ludicrous too. 50:50 ball in the air and an accidental collision. No malice in the challenge.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A derby game and the players show some passion WOW, the ref dealt with it, move on.
I think they wanted to charge both clubs for something after all the bad press it generated. They need to be seen to be acting upon that game.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharon Stone
There's nothing really either club could have done though so they've decided to come up with this charge. That incident was nothing, there's a melee like that in loads of games that nothing happens.
I'd assume they'll use the opportunity to give a slap on the wrists and there will be no further real penalty.
It's quite incredible really.
Having watched the game back Flo doesn't actually commit a single foul in the game. He ends up booked for persistant fouling and booked again for reacting to provocation after another non foul was given against him.
After he wins that 50/50 ball clean as a bell he collides with the Hearts man. Nothing wrong with that and just because the Hearts boy got rag dolled and his face bounced off the ground doesn't make it a foul.
Kamberi's only reaction after the referee incredibly gives a foul is one of shock - as it should have been. He doesn't react angry at the incident or when Dunne comes in to get in his face. It wasn't until the little rat Gurrachio comes in ages after the incident and gives him the cowardly shove in the back on the blind side of the ref does Kamberi react. The guRATchio then completes the dirty handed sneaky mission by asking for him to be carded with the old imaginary cards.
Exactly how I saw it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MacGruber
No club shoukd accept any sanction from the SFA EVER. Joke organisation with absolutely no credibility or authority. Just stick 2 fingers up to them and keep saying NAW like The Rangers do.
To me this is totally what this is all about!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo70
If no action from the SPFL then there was a chance, the Police could take action for inciting trouble?
Appealing the decision, will probably upheld, as it was a something or nothing incident but they want to show who's boss!!!!
The foul for his first booking was a soft foul but 3 free kicks had been awarded against him before his first booking (rightly or wrongly) and that’s the reason why he was bookedQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan62
I’m not saying he should have been booked but it was his fourth foul in a short space of time
I think it depends what picture you look at, this one is on the BBC website!Quote:
Originally Posted by overdrive
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/onesport/cp...ynecastle1.jpg
Fair enough. Interestingly, there looks to be only one player acting aggressively there and he's the one who was accusing Lennon of faking getting hit by a coin.Quote:
Originally Posted by where'stheslope
His ‘foul’ for the booking was his third ‘foul’, that’s not persistent fouling, and unprecedented to get a booking without a talking to first saying ‘this is your last’.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/46138958
"When I look at the first situation I don't see anything in it. I see a lot of people going in to break things up and stop a situation arising. In fact, I thought they were helping the referee"
Don't agree with Craig Levein much but he's 100% right here.
Joke of a situation to be cited for this.
The group of Hearts players pushing and pulling Kemberi around are helping the referee?Quote:
Originally Posted by 0762