Anybody watch it last night?
New studio but they need to sort out the reflections. For me its a pretty decent product now with an hour of highlights. Show returns at 6.30 next Sunday.
Printable View
Anybody watch it last night?
New studio but they need to sort out the reflections. For me its a pretty decent product now with an hour of highlights. Show returns at 6.30 next Sunday.
I like Stewart and Thompson, Jonathon Sutherland not so much but he's not desperately bad. I think it's got a lot better over the last year or 2 (especially since we're back on it :greengrin) but it just feels a bit rushed, especially the analysis bits.
Still not great highlights though.... pretty much showed our goals and their close chances... not a true reflection of the game yesterday.
Spend far too much time on the old firm as always.
I think sportscene is fine. Give me that over the over analysis and posturing of match of the day.
My only beef is Thompson continually interrupting Stewart to butt in and state the obvious.
I thought it was ok - cleared up the handball and rubbished Robinson’s post match comments.
I like Stewart and Thompson but agree at times they tend to talk over each other.
On another note - any idea how Stevie Maclean can now play on artificial pitches? He never used to be able to get insurance and all Rob Maclean done was acknowledge that without explaining what’s changed.
Suffered 10 minutes of their Saturday results show at 3pm. David Currie, McFadden, Thompson and Shelley Kerr watching all the SPFL games. McFadden and Thompson missed a couple of goals talking drivel.
Shelley Kerr was the best of them by a long way.
Sunday's was better. Stewart and Thompson are ok.
Sportscene is a pretty good show. Sutherland, Stewart and Thomson are all fine.
It's a very good show when Hibs win :greengrin
its now better than the trumpets on Sportsound.
Still undecided on the new studio but that’s just me being picky. Sutherland’s gone up in my rating somewhat over the last season or so but I still wish they’d find someone better to be hosting it. I like Stewart and Thompson, they give you the good cop bad cop pairing and can add extra entertainment at times. Only moan would be I thought our game got the least amount of highlights last night than anyone else? Seemed to just be the three goals but then again there wasn’t much else to show.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thought Thompson and Stewart found Gerrards not in the same class comment highly amusing presenter guy was trying not to laugh.
I think it's fine.
It getting better and both pundits are decent.
Highlights just seem to be thrown together though without a timescale or build up.
Watched sportscene extra today and all they covered was Gerrard, Rangers, Gerrard,Gerrard,Gerrard,The Ref,Morelos and some more Gerrard. So frustrating waiting for any discussion about Hibs that never came. Steven Thompson to his credit tried on numerous occasions to change the subject to literally anything else only for Jonathan Sutherland to drag it back to Gerrard. It was embarrassing and a waste of time for anybody who isn't a rangers fan with bampot conspiracy theories swirling round their head. If they empty Sutherland it would be decent watch imo.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Is there a reason Thompson constantly refers to us as Hibernian rather than Hibs?
I thought it wasn't one of the better shows. Michael stewart likes to explain things which he does great on the radio or live games but it all seems rushed especially the bit at the end of our bit about sjm. It's almost as if they are not sure what sutherland was going to ask them. Maybe a little more rehearsing and they will be fine. As for the 3-3 from thommo. Deary me.
Just another of these yam-related mysteries which are never explained, like the two point deduction which should have been three. And the safety certificates which get waved through when the main stand remains a building site...
As you say, though, how come Hearts give him the nod to play when Saints didn't? It's not as though Saints squad is so big that they would happily have rested one of their better players if they felt he was fit to play on these surfaces. You'd hope Hearts didn't put any pressure on him in this regard eg At 36 you'll be retiring soon so this will be your last move. If you want it to happen you need to make yourself available for every game.
Stewart and Thompson do a decent job as pundits, however it has way too much of pundit 'chat' versus actual game highlights. It needs the amount of time of actual game footage increased.
I still lament not getting Sportscene on a Saturday night like we used to. I accept that given the amount of Sunday football now we clearly need it on Sunday night as well. Seems easy enough to do with Match of the Day. I also thinks it's a shame we get virtually nothing from lower leagues now.
Strangely used to love the old Division 1 highlights from a few years back when it was on STV, Scotsport First I think it was called. The SPL version was horrible though. Big daft studio audience with a 5 aside goal infront of them, presenters were torture as well. Still watched it religiously right enough...
Sportscene's not great, but a far cry from those days. Wee round-up of the lower divisions would be a nice addition IMO.
On tonight 6.30
Livi's pitch, wow. How is that allowed in the top league? Complete joke.
Livi's pitch is perhaps the worst I've seen.
Disgusting. They should be forced to get rid of it or play all their home games at a neutral venue. What does UEFA say about this nonsense?
Scotland has some terrible football broadcasters.
It was ever so. Pros like Mountford and Crampsey don't grow on trees.
[QUOTE=cleanyman;5512347]Mountford would send you to sleep.[/QUOTE
It was Arthur Montford. Championed the phrases: ‘He really biffed it!’ and ‘’Stramash!’ 😬
Also, judging early on...how bad are Dundee and Motherwell?
Both have pitiful forwards.
The SPFL need to have a serious word with Livi regarding that pitch, just watch the players that get injured on that, what a f***ing embarrassment for Scottish football.
[QUOTE=Wee Effen Bee;5512358]Sensation!
Up go the heads!
Shot comes in. GOAL HIBS!
How can anyone say that is boring?
Come on Denis! Unbiased commentary Scotland v Czechoslovakia
Or my all time favourite David Francey:
Its a drive ..... goal for Dundee ALBERT KIDD has scoooorrrreedddd!!!!
Happy memories :wink:
Sportscene is terrible full stop along with open mikes and off the ball should be scrapped!
[QUOTE=Northernhibee;5512847]Agree! Wish I had one penny for every time an English commentator mentioned 1966 through all the failed attempts I would not be here typing away like a mad Hibby on dotnet I would be in the Caribbean with a blonde on each arm smoking a big ceegar!
:cb
I think Sportscene is a good show. Michael Stewart and Steven Thompson are better than the pundits on Match of the day by a country mile. I do think they could improve the show further by showing some highlights goals from outside the Premiership.
I don't think Sportscene is too bad to be honest. I think Michael Stewart is a great pundit and Steven Thompson isn't bad either. It's a huge improvement on Scotsport from about 10-12 years ago.
Can t stand Michael Stewart and his (nobody's right except me) attitude.
I think the pundits are good, I like Stewart and Thompson but the actual content in terms of highlights and analysis is poor.
Could do with it being a longer show to allow for more analysis and better highlights, the pundits on MOTD are crap but the highlights are longer and analysis more in depth.
Presumably those that want rid of OAM never watch Sky/BT SportsBBC/Peter and Roughie sitting on a studio when someone watching a game on a video feed screams goal? Presumably watching your phone on Live score is more fun? Half the participants are mince but at least you get a live update. Since it's on the radio you can be doing other things same time. Can't always get to a game...
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
On tonight 6 pm
That was a stonewall penalty for Aberdeen yesterday
There was people saying yesterday Hanlon got the ball
Wit...
And Mackay Steven should have been sent off.
Not sure if that should have been a sending off for Killie
I shouted to McInnes that his penalty claim was the clearest dive you'd ever see.....Oops.....he just laughed.
At the game from our angle Paul goes in, ball moves, then player falls over. Looked like a great tackle. Slo mo and reruns show it should have been a pen. Didn't need a replay to see we should have had a pen when Consadine pushes Boyle off the ball in the box.
Sent from my F8331 using Tapatalk
Was my opinion too but having seen the Sportscene highlights you can see it should have been a penalty.
It’s easy to see how the red has got it wrong, especially from his angle but it’s the wrong call nonetheless. What I don’t understand is how he never gave an Aberdeen corner
I’ve not seen an angle on Hibs TV Or otherwise that shows him touch the ball. I’ve seen a few that certainly makes it look like it but if you see the angle from behind the goals on BBC’s Highlights you see the Aberdeen player touches the ball away before Hanlons foot is anywhere near
Was a very difficult one to get but imo we got a bit lucky in the end
Albas coverage is pretty basic, Hanlons missed and caught the guy, stone waller. Camilles right.
Need to get a new telly mate! 🤤
I agree entirely the BBC ALBA replay clearly showed Paul Hanlon touched the ball and the commentators agreed! It was a blatant dive both spectacular and hilarious as I have already stated on the forum. Contrary to common belief BBC ALBA has excellent coverage of Scottish Football. Yesterday at half-time there was an interview with Steve Cowan which was interesting. Does anyone trust what BBC Scotland transmits anymore?
Not a penalty for me re Hanlon, the dons player made a meal of it. Certainly a case for GMS to be sent off but it was inconclusive for me that the contact was intentionally meant to hurt big Ryan.
The worst decision by far for me was the one against Killie in favour of the yams. Killie boss Clarke had every right to be outraged as that was never a sending off. Debatable whether it was even a foul. Collum did the yams a huge favour there and gave them a massive helping hand.
Roll on next week. Livi away I think and should be an opportunity to get all three points.
Said at the match Paul got a toe on the ball although some around me disagreed - I`ve seen nothing on the highlights to change my mind.
The guy did not dive into his foot at all. His foot was planted before Hanlon made contact from the side of him
First pictures show the Aberdeen player making contact with ball ahead of Hanlon. Hanlons left foot is still in motion moving towards the ball at this point
Attachment 21178
The second picture shows Hanlon making contact with the player having missed the ball
Attachment 21179
I thought it was the right call at the time too and so I can absolutely see why you think it was but looking at the replays it’s definitely one we got away with. Still, they got away with one on Boyle which McInnes was strangely quiet about
Ach it was a pen all day long...Hanlon never touches the ball.
But Boylers was a pen as well...clear shove in the back.
Killie red was never a sending off either!
Finally how woeful did StMirren look in the ‘highlights’ of their game. Wow!
Me neither. I see a clear change of direction for the ball after Hanlon toes it and before Ferguson stretches for it, regardless of what the commentator says... but then he hadn't watched it as many times as I have before he said it :greengrin
Edit
I've just had another go, and have to admit that having finally managed to stop frame at the right moment, at 2:31 in. Penalty!
I've been in no doubt for some time, but yesterday highlighted that Willie Collum is no longer fit to referee football at the top level.
Some of his decisions were absolutely honking, no more so than the red card for Dicker. Both Killie and Hearts can probably also feel aggrieved not to have been given a couple of penalties each too. Sadly, the only person who'll get in trouble will be Steve Clarke for calling out Collum after the game.
I have put the Hanlon / Ferguson incident on slo mo a few times this morning - the ball changes direction when Hanlon gets a touch, it was not a penalty, regardless if what Mikey Stewart and Thommo think.
He unquestionably played the ball first - why a corner not given I just put down to ***** officials.
It was a penalty.
If the Aberdeen player hadn't thrown his hands in the air theatricaly he might have got a penalty,but by doing that it looked a dive
The theatrics do him no favours. At the game, I thought it was a blatant dive and should have been a yellow. From the replay it looks like it was probably a penalty, but the way he throws his arms up and drops to the ground isn't consistent with a trip so I can see why the ref decided it wasn't a penalty.
Downloaded the SPFL vid on Youtube
Attachment 21180
The reason for the change of ball travel direction is because Ferguson hits the ball with the inside of his left foot a fraction before Paul gets there... between 1:00 and 1:01
They didn’t discuss McGregor deliberately knew dropping Hartley yesterday - Craigan called it out in commentary but nothing mentioned on sportscene.
On at 6 pm.
Looking forward to seeing this '50-50' challenge which led to a broken leg.
What a stinking goal
Souttar=Rio Ferdinand apparently :faf: