Been charged with breach of the peace according to the Sun -
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/new...ement-_-FBPAGE
Printable View
Been charged with breach of the peace according to the Sun -
https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/new...ement-_-FBPAGE
her family and friend(s) will pay any fine, they pay for all her holidays as well apparently due to her not being able to live on a paltry 23k/year, poor poor wee thing that she is
i'l wait to see if the scottish daily express/mail print the story
I'm rather surprised The Sun has been on it to be honest. I'd have expected to pick it up in The National or the Sunday Herald. Daily Record at a push. But not The Sun.Quote:
Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875
Given the torrent of abuse she's received over the last week or so it's hardly a shock she's snapped. No one knows the full story, including me, only what the Sun and 'eyewitness' have reported. Given the SNP supporters distrust of the bias media I assume they won't be taking the story as gospel.
I found her claims on TV misleading and she certainly deserved challenged on them, some of that went too far. There's no way of knowing if this is linked to that or not and I'm not sure this fine is relevant either way.
Well said.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Boy
The hounding of a nurse continues. When are SNP supporters going to realise that others are entitled to opinions whether you like them or not.
Do you have some evidence that the latest incident was hounding by the SNP?Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky
I think he may mean those who can't wait to stick the boot in for this incident without knowing the facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldo7
Aye, that stalwart, SNP supporting paper, the Sun.Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky
Oh the irony. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
You'll need to explain that one to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by snooky
It's not directed at you, Marinello. It's relating to 'SNP bad' agendas.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
Considering the nurses high profile on social media just now, and this incident sounding nothing more than a domestic, was it really necessary to publish where she lives and what car she drives?
There's a small element of idiots out there that would use that information to cause mischief!
I agree with you 100%. No need.Quote:
Originally Posted by speedy_gonzales
They shouldn't have released such information. However, I can understand why they did it. The article claims that the person being abused wasn't provoking her at all. So I assume there must have been eye witnesses, otherwise they wouldn't have gotten away with making such a claim.Quote:
Originally Posted by speedy_gonzales
I wouldn't have mentioned the nurse again if it wasn't for this. So the sensitive souls can put their dummies away now. :dummytit:
Any need?Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Any need for the usual SNP nasty cult chat? You don't put people in their place for that nonsense, you're quite happy to join in.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
I'm personally glad she's been booked. Justice was served, she got what she deserved. :smug:
Did the sun not back the SNP at the ladt two elections?Quote:
Originally Posted by snooky
I seem to remeber salmond getting very cosy with rupert murdo h and / or his employees at bute house.
Well considering Murdoch and his chums control around 95% of the British media, the SNP had to do something to get on his good side. It's not easy being the 45% with about 2% representation in the media if we're lucky.Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
well said
Sorry, was that a yes? So the sun arent anti SNP then?Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
95%? Behave.
The Times, the Sun, Sky.
What about ITV, BBC, C4 and all the other papers, not to mention online?
My apologies.Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
96%
Ha ha, touche!Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Attachment 18674Quote:
Originally Posted by snooky
I'm as pro-yes as anyone and think the BBC regularly stitch up anything which doesn't conform to the mainstream Westminster consensus. I don't even pay the licence fee or have TV for that very reason.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
However, people have to drop this. It's doing no-ones cause any good whatsoever.
It was new news, which is why I posted it. It's not like I dug up the exact same story as before. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
:agree: Enough of nurse Claire already. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
I'm absolutely sure the Beeb has an anti-Indy agenda but NS laid the groundwork to turn this into a +ve spin for the SNP (nurses slightly better treated here) and the SNP spinners sadly ****** it up (nurse attacks, yawn).
The Sun is pro SNP in Scotland, absolutely hates them in it's English editions.
It's the folk on twitter copying in the Royal College of Nursing into the latest story. Madness.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
They'll find out in their own way and pick through if there's a case to be answered such as through her management or her annual re-registration. They don't need folks on twitter pursuing a witch hunt.
What possible human benefit would there be to seeing her lose her livelihood and then, ironically, getting into the very same financial problems she claimed she had in the debate.
Pro-yessers have to convince and understand no voters. Mounting a vendetta to destroy someone who, for their own reasons, embellished their situation to make a political point on a political show is not a good look.
Have pointed that out to a couple of fools today who then played the man and not the argument.
I get it, but perhaps with the tinfoil hat on, this is exactly what opponents want - feeding someone to the sharks then complaining there's been a shark attack.Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Not having a go at you specifically but beyond this, there's all sorts of sh**e being stirred which is not encouraging for neutrals and the yet-to-be convinced.
Spot on.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
I agree totally that there has been a stupid online response to this woman's story. What I've not heard is BBC explaining why this woman was invited on to the programme 3 times and guaranteed a question. Or why no-one at the BBC checked and reported back on her claims. They do the same thing with unionist MSPs and MPs, allowing lies to go unchallenged. The gullible might believe they are giving a platform to the truth. However, if you do challenge them your decried as a cybernat, ultranat, natzi or worse.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
Good post.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
I see today that sturgeon had to stop the crowd of activists booing at their manifesto launch, twice, because journalists asked sturgeon questions they didnt like.
It's a fair point. But it's inevitable that people are going to pick up on this story and talk about it. Perhaps that was the whole idea? Stir up more annoyance on the indy side, then call that annoyance a "witch hunt". It seems to be the effective tactic.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
I haven't heard any of the questions yet but already know that they will have been all about independence.Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
Agree there was much for them to check up on yet the next day we got nonsense about her being in tears etc. BBC at its best IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Geo_1875
Why would snp activists boo a question about independence- its why they are all there!Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Perhaps because we're told constantly that we're "obsessed with independence", despite mentioning it considerably less than the so called "unionist" parties?Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
We're not booing the subject of independence, we're booing the fact that other parties are hiding behind an anti-independence stance so they don't have to inform people just how shocking their policies would be for Scotland.
A party whose sole reason for existing is to achieve independence ARE obsessed by it. It is, literally your defining characteristic, your reason for being, your whole poiny in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
I habe to say i find this line of argumeny weird from the SNP. The party has stated, in their last two manifestoes that a bote for them is effectively a vote for another referendum.
Yet, other parties are accused of keeping the issue on the agenda, or, shock, of talking about it and opposing it.
Its all a bit doublethink if you ask me.
To be fair, I've heard of this happening at events held by most of the political parties during this election campaign. Not that I'm justifying it, I bet Sturgeon was cringing.Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
Difference being, the SNP actually put out a credible manifesto. Of course the SNP are "obsessed" with independence, they wouldn't be much of a "national" party if they weren't. But they don't base their entire governorship of Scotland on one issue, they talk about other things as well. What other things are Labour or The Conservatives talking about in Scotland? Every single soundbite is about opposing another referendum. They don't want to talk about credible policies, because they have none.Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
Find where I have described the SNP as nasty and quote it back to me. People can disagree with your opinions you know. There was no need for your comment, we can at least treat each other with respect here.Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
I have no sympathy for her whatsoever.
Politics has become a fairly partizan business. In these days of social media, trolls, cyberthis an cyberthat, anyone who sticks their neck out to make a stupid political point should make sure they have their facts right and their nose clean. They also need to have the temperament to deal with the storm that might be stirred up.
The reaction she stirred up was inevitable and she's brought it all on herself.
o/t I realised just now I'm starting to hear your posts mentally delivered in the style of the undercover English polisman in Allo Allo. :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by SouthsideHarp_Bhoy
Isn't Foodbank the name of Malmaison's new restaurant?
That's what ive been going for...!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
She made a valid but in a poor way. Big difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
http://www.hibs.net/images/smilies/not%20worthy.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Haha there'll be an artisan sandwich shop in Shoreditch called that.Quote:
Originally Posted by heretoday
She made it all about herself. The problem with that was that she was ultimately lying about herself. I doubt she gives the slightest care in the world how much other nurses get paid to be honest. She's your standard dye in the wool tory. Me me me!Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
You've got to take her interaction, in a long list of **** ups by the BBC. Just look at the "question time", plants in the last few months. It's the BBC who should be brought to book by the whole situation. I remember when Donalda Mackinnon promised to put it all right...Right.:rolleyes:
Still waiting on that.
Also appears the "small business owner" who spoke in last night's programme, worried about living wage, corporation tax and VAT on school fees runs a £950,000 turnover operation. He's hardly struggling.
A bit like the outraged nurse, broadcasters have a responsibility not to put contributors into difficulties by enabling them to make daft claims.
All that info is in the public domain.
I raised the situation about the nurse and do think BBC have some questions to answe as they seemed pretty insistent to have her on without verifying her backstory.
The problem with that is that the main focus of the attack both here and online is on the Nurse as an individual rather than the BBC as an institution. The only people to benefit from continuing to target her are those who want to play the cybernat card. It's such a waste of energy.Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldo7
He lost me when he started complaining about VAT on his kids school fees. Corbyn answered him brilliantly.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
The lassie is a political mule, and has been used by someone in the background. The story of Foodbanks, and the colluding BBC has been on most of my social media stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
Me too. What a pity, eh?Quote:
Originally Posted by marinello59
Corbyn did answer him really well.
I should note that he also is being widely trolled. The problem is not an SNP/Yes one but of social media one and the kind of set-ups the media create for people who become fall guys when the truth is revealed.
:agree: 100%.Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Yup. Question Time is presented as being an on-air opportunity for ordinary people to confront politicians with their own personal concerns and opinions.
NOT as a manipulated political pantomime where the BBC plant stooges like the "struggling small businessman" in the audience to embarrass the invited speakers.
If the nurse in question had put her question as relating to her work-colleagues and the difficulties those who're lower-paid were suffering - fine. Portraying herself as victim deserving sympathy - NOT fine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lucky
Not if they're seeking to support those opinions with lies and misrepresentation, surely?
Truth in politics not on the Labour agenda, then? :rolleyes:
Thats not a big turnover, but i think CWG will be better to comment.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
What difference would it make anyway? The questiob is either a good one or a bad one surely?
Agree with this. Why these people dont just log off for a few days is beyond me.Quote:
Originally Posted by steakbake
Agree with your first point, HOH although rather than say lying, I'd use 'purposely misleading'.Quote:
Originally Posted by High-On-Hibs
Can't agree with your second one. I'd like to think she was speaking up for the nurses rather than the LabaTory Party :rolleyes:. This time, I'll give her the benefit of the doubt. :whistle:
TBH, I don't really know why we're still talking about Nursey. She's yesterday's news.
Now what about that wee other thing :hmmm: Oh aye, the Election!