Just as well this is a family board :)
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
Printable View
http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/the...tile-takeover/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Up until now most estimates were that they had money till November. Not sure why it would now be brought forward. Either way, they still appear to need external finance. Doesn't look like the 3 bears are up for lending anymore and there is little chance of a share issue while there are ongoing court cases casting doubt on the ownership of assets (that may also make admin difficult).
In short Billy, I've not got a clue but my fingers are crossed. We could do with a break.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ally and The Rangers agree to terminate contractearly , dave king claims Hibs approached The Rangers over Scott Allan and The Rangers to win premiership next season.
http://www.scotsman.com/sport/footba...ract-1-3883084
Deluded.
Raman Bhardwaj@STVRaman 43m43 minutes ago Dave King claims Hibs came to Rangers asking if they wanted to do business to buy Scott Allan.
FROM STV NEWS APP
Hibs made initial approach to Rangers over Scott Allan, Dave King claims
Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:18:00 BST
Rangers chairman Dave King has claimed that Hibernian made the initial approach to the Ibrox club over the transfer of Scott Allan.
Highly-rated midfielder Allan moved from Hibernian to Celtic in August after weeks of uncertainty over the player’s future.
Rangers had made multiple bids for the 23-year-old before his switch to Glasgow’s East End but Hibernian rejected their offers, insisting they would not sell to a Championship promotion rival.
When confirming that Allan had submitted a written transfer request after a second Rangers offer was knocked back, Hibs had said that they had rejected two "unwelcome and uninvited" bids for the player. The club explained that they had "no wish to transfer a valuable player to strengthen a major rival in the battle to win the Championship and gain promotion to the Premiership".
Now, King has questioned the Edinburgh side’s public stance, claiming that Hibs had contacted Rangers to initiate talks over the possible sale of Allan.
When the initial bid was made from Rangers and rejected by their rivals, he said that the reply surprised him. He added that he was "very, very grateful" to Celtic for eventually signing Allan, saying the Parkhead club had "done Rangers a favour".
"Where I viewed it differently from Hibs was that the initial approach had really come from Hibs," King said.
"They said ‘we know you’re interested in Scott so if you do want to do business let’s do it quickly so we know where we stand’.
"We proceeded to do it quite quickly.
"We were therefore surprised when Hibs’ official response was ‘we will not sell to Rangers under any circumstances whatsoever’.
"We initially took that as a negotiating position to increase the price. It was only after another couple of rounds of negotiations that we understood they were really serious. No matter what we did they were not going to sell to us.
"Therefore, I’m very, very grateful to Celtic for taking him away from Hibs. They did us a favour rather than leaving him behind."
While saying he understood Hibs' eventual stance, he insisted they had initiated discussions.
"The initial one was a discussion with Hibs saying ‘Look, we’ve heard you’re interested in Scott Allan," King repeated. "I think [Rangers director] Paul Murray had made a statement to the media.
"[They said] ‘If you are interested, please come in and do business quickly so we know where we stand and can get a replacement’.
"That’s the invitation that we acted on. Clearly, at a later stage, someone at Hibs [changed that].
"As far as I’m concerned, Rangers acted correctly in all aspects and we’ve put it behind us.
"I’ve had a change of correspondence with them and I think we’re both happy there’s no issue to be carried forward.
Hibernian have yet to respond to King's claim.
http://m.stv.tv/sport/football/clubs...e-king-claims/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Either we did make an initial approach or we didn't make an initial approach. After all that happened, I think we all want to know from the horse's mouth that we didn't. There's a simple way to get the facts straight.
I suspect if hibs do respond it'll be another well worded statement. I'd like to see them name dropping the south African judge that labelled king a glib and shameless liar.