Now that will put a smile on my face after yesterday....
Printable View
Sidney is now back to normal after our holiday and i am raging apologies to all you guys for the suspension of my campaign on my to do list tomorrow
1. Another letter to HWU
2. Letter to LBP
3. Letter to Electricity company.
4. Letter to Ambulance Service.
5. EDC Commercial Rates Department.
6. Letter to BDO ( not acting in best inrerest of creditors )
7. Letter to the Insolvancy Practitioners Governing body comlaining about BDOs Actions.
I Am back.:hnet::not worth
:not worth welcome back Citizen Sid, another wee matter you could probably help get some action on...........
My mate got a splinter in his erse whilst sitting on the decrepit seats at tiny on Sunday. I told him you would be just the man to look into it for him.
Keep up the good work.
The Trumpets are at it again! Keekbackers venting their spleens,suggesting that they are a special case and should be allowed to bring in extra players as...god forbid, some of their team might get injured!
Doe's the term 'Signing Embargo' mean anything???.....
An embargo is an embargo, end of! The boys n gals on that forum don't understand that they must use what they have & if they cannot raise a team so match gets postponed then that's more points docked in my book.
Am I right in thinking one of UKIO and UBIG won't actually be involved if a CVA goes through?
HE was already registered with the SPL due to his loan deal, there was no need to re-register him due to his previous resigtration, what part of this is hard for you two to understand. No rules were broken.
:agree:
This was reported yesterday on Bloomberg - there are Lita 1.3 billion of creditor claims (about £324 million) of which The Lithuanian State insurance rescue fund made about 60% or £194m. They effectively own Hearts now and will be calling the shots in the admin process. Can't see them settleing for £3m from FOH.
With an agreement that he remained Liverpool's player. homfc couldn't sell him during that ; he wasn't their player. When he joined homfc permanently, you can be sure he signed a new contract AND that homfc had to register him again, and that was all effective AFTER admin. It's just been a twisting of the interpretation of the so-called signing ban. That's why I expect there to be more challenges to the bam, and for some of those challenges to be successful.
Lack of cover for specialist position is often given as a reason to sign keepers outside of transfer windows - must be open to homfc to use to sign a 'specialist' outfielder.
Not enough players to complete a fixture because there's a 'virus'.
Not enough players to fulfill a fixture because of international commitments? That's bound to feature.
The excuses will come thick and fast.
You still dont understand the process do you.
His registration was not cancelled by signing a new contract at Hearts it was proloned/extended whilst he was still registered with Hearts, yes maybe people call it a loop hole, but it was not a breach in the rules. If he left back to Liverpool, then Liverpool would have had to register him with the EFA/EPL and then his old registration would be with the EFA/EPL and not the SFA/SPL.
Come on, take the green tinted glasses off for a second, i hate them as much as any other Hibby, but i can see no rules were broken. :agree:
Actually, I do. I well understand no rules were broken. I well understand a loophole was used. It went against the spirit of the ban, morally wrong, but what's a moral to that club. They even steal from the Poppy Trust.
He may have been registered to play for homfc, but he signed a contract after admin. Everyone talks about a signing ban, while the wording of it is a "registration ban".
My point is that they'll find other loopholes, deceptions, pleading of "fair play", "special case", or manipulative means to sign more players. And they will.
Now Hearts effectivley in hock to the EU as well as Lithuanian state