Printable View
[QUOTE=Cropley10;4391866]You would think if he felt there had been a default he could comfortably use the agreement itself to withdraw the facility or request repayment and go down the legal route if it is not paid as requested. I don't get why he has to go down the GM route in that circumstance?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy74
http://www.sfm.scot/sfm-the-next-ste...-25/?cid=56311
Seems a a reasonable assessment and if nothing else suggests that King is a very wealthy individual [suggests a net worth of £26M], but not on the scale that TRFC need. Others with better financial knowledge may be able to comment.
I realise that the author may not be absolutely impartial :tin hat:
Interesting article. The guy seems to have done a fair bit of homework.Quote:
Originally Posted by Radium
I'm not going to get all forensic on his own forensics, but if £26m is what he has available in cash, there's no way he is going to, or should, invest much more than a drop of that in TRFC.
Goldman Sachs are on the Ashley payroll-don't think he'll miss many tricks.As an example Rangers were shouting about how they were going to reveal the retail offshoot arrangements-they've been warned off.
This strategy (joke) of choosing what debts to pay, and which not, worked out well for the oldco the last time. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by jonty
When they didn't have a pot to p*** in they go crawling for cash to keep the lights on, but now when the terms don't seem so good anymore they welch on the deal.
Same old newco, just like oldco.
Barcabhoy :hilariousQuote:
Originally Posted by Radium
Pure guess work as to how much money King has got, but if remotely accurate he won't be able to sink £30m in as he once claimed he would do.
Sunday. The second sentence appears incomplete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sunday Mail
Another hatchet job on King?
https://rangerssupportersloyal.wordp.../#comment-1381
Smashing read !!Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Looks like there may be some fun to be had in the weeks ahead !!
Interesting if true, which I wouldn't doubt by King's absence :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
What's the 'vigorous legal action after June 12th'? Apologies if I've missed something obvious...Quote:
Originally Posted by AlbertK86
Presumably from Mike Ashley once he's formally told after the GM on 12 June that he's not getting his loan repaid?Quote:
Originally Posted by s.a.m
Ahh..Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
:aok:
That was a pleasant few minutes reading. :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Is it not just the ramblings of a pissed off hun rather than anything that's actually likely to happen though?Quote:
Originally Posted by greenlex
Sounded a it more educated than yer average sevconian.... But that ain't hard mind !!Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo70
Sadly, 'The Scotsman' these days is nothing more than an East Coast version of the 'Daily R*tard' - the headline shoud say 'Rangers board WOULD LIKE/PREFER to ignore Mike Ashley loan demand' but it can't, it can only ASK it's shareholders. Ok, it's highly unlikely they would agree to it as they haven't tippled that King as just the latest crook (albeit a proven one) to be in charge and so is currently more popular than MA but the headline is just another 'WE'RE RANGERS - WE DECIDE' ego-massage for the moron-loyal.Quote:
Originally Posted by jonty
The ramblings of a pissed off hun not impressed with the happy clappy persona the vast majority of the illiterate hordes have lined up behind. As Albert says, he seems more 'educated' shall we say, than the average zombie...he even manages to do the whole post without mentioning caffliks or using gutter language. I love it when there's only a handful in a crowd who can smell the smell the ****, but can't stop the headlong rush to dive in.Quote:
Originally Posted by bingo70
:lolrangers:
'In the mist of all this'Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Haven't a foggy (I know - :embarrass) what he/she/it means, presumably 'MIDST' was the aim ?
Love it when the Hun gets use of a PC and has to communicate with words rather than grunts - they must think it somehow disguises the damage/affliction caused by generations of in-breeding !!.
It could just have been a typo ...Quote:
Originally Posted by Deansy
Totally unrelated to the financial shenanigans, but a couple of weeks back the Blue Order rolled out one of their cringe worthy 'wordy' banners. One that blabbed on about "no true Ranger ever failed in the traditions etc etc blah blah blah"Quote:
Originally Posted by Deansy
When I asked my resident hun colleague about that Motherwell effort that looped over Cummy Welt's heid, he reckoned that Cummy was 'worried about the post behind him'...oh how I scoffed about these True Rangers'. The Iron Curtain must be spinning in their graves.
Derek Mcinnes apparently has just been confirmed as manager. The man's insane if true.
EZ
No chance. Where are you hearing that?Quote:
Originally Posted by eezyrider
Fill your pockets - he can be backed at 7/1 with Will Hills.Quote:
Originally Posted by eezyrider
It looks like Warburton is a shoo-in for the gig.
Have you read the whole Facebook thread thing? Dinnae be daft.Quote:
Originally Posted by eezyrider
The Rangers will win playoffs -Advocaat resignsQuote:
Originally Posted by eezyrider
The Rangers don't win playoffs - Advocaat re signs
Hmmm only for a year though . What price is he ?
Advocaat with no budget? Not going to happen.Quote:
Originally Posted by hibees 7062
They'll have money if they go upQuote:
Originally Posted by HoboHarry
I agree. - that's what meant with my first commentQuote:
Originally Posted by hibees 7062
That the post on Gramo's Facebook? I almost fell for it too.Quote:
Originally Posted by eezyrider