Check it out now ? :thumbsup:
Printable View
How much was rangers fined last year anyway?
Same rules apply surely?
I Am swithing my direct action from written letters to E Mails from now on i plan to trawl through the list and contact as many of the victims as possible and try to rally them into a direct action group nothing like stirring up bother for the yams.
And yes i am a bit like a dog with a bone once i get a mission to undertake.
Sidney :hnet:
:not worth
what does swithing mean :confused:
i need to know
On broke back they reckon 3pm for results of hearing ?
GGTTH
Just catching up with this thread after losing my shirt at Goodwood yesterday. Its ok though I'm going to tell the Tote & the bookies I'm now in admin & they'll get hee haw!!
A few random thoughts.
1. Can I join in the general acclaim for CWG & disgust for Yams, a sorry, sordid outfit.
2. I take no pleasure in being proved correct that HMRC would be shafted by Yams. I'm intrigued to note however that the whole debt (£1.9mm) is shown as due to the Debt Mgt & Insolvency service. This could mean, either Yams lied re making the 1st debt payment, or payment was very small or possibly that subsequent unpaid PAYE/VAT was added to the total. Either way it's shameful & I don't think HMRC have covered themselves in glory either.
3. I continue to be concerned re Bryan Jackson's role in the admin process. In yesterday's DR he basically parrotted Foulkes' assertion a day earlier that PBS had limited value, that any developer would face hostility & there were lots of pitfalls in the way of selling PBS. Absolute nonsense as posters on here have affirmed & his job is to represent the creditors not Yams!
4. If Yams really want to have any standing as a community club they should use all donations already received or divert F of H funds etc to repay small local creditors. I know there are legal requirements re favouring of creditors & F of H haven't collected yet but if they use a small % of the imagination they showed in lying to everyone over this whole shameful episode, then they'll find a way to do it.
I'm not holding my breath though.
434 "GUESTS" make that 444 :greengrin
Yamyakbackers know where to come for real information :agree:
That £1.9m tax bill is never getting paid regardless and that is poor.
Why are 'football' debts considered more important than the tax debts? Surely this is an easy amendment to make to the rules, all football debts and all tax debts must be paid regardless.
As for the other creditors. I have genuine sympathy for them all, BUT.. do business in a submarine, prepare to get sunk...
Whatever sanctions the SPFL can make today, I hope they go about changing some rules fast, so they can hammer clubs 'legally' for financial irresponsibility.
any word from the hearing yet?
Did anyone else notice on the BDO document yesterday (page 13) it had Hearts down as being in existence from 1905, with the date of incorporation given as 29th April 1905.
Yet they still claim to be founded in 1874. :confused:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BQk8dpgCAAAu1gv.png:large