Yes and Yes are the answers I thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by Eyrie
Printable View
Yes and Yes are the answers I thinkQuote:
Originally Posted by Eyrie
On the first, absolutely.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eyrie
The second will depend on the wording of the contracts. The answer is probably yes, but this is a soap opera, remember [emoji6]
Think MA/SD own some of the Rangers Trade marks thoughQuote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
:agree: Pretty sure they are his property so if this particular version of the rangers disappears / defaults he still has the rights to use them and presumably use the law to prevent anyone else from using them without his consent / payment?.Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
They would probably still be able to stick random meaningless wee stars all over their jerseys like now but the other symbols might not be available to them going forward if Ashley chooses to withhold them.
I wouldn't worry about it mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibs07p
It's pretty clear from what's going on that nobody at Ibrox (the board, the players, the fans) have learned anything from the whole sorry episode either.
A star for each admin/liquidation would be pleasingQuote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
Rangers media has been hacked..... If you do have a look, beware it's VERY rude :agree:
:faf:or one for every bumped creditor?Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
They don't have jerseys that big.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
Kris Boyd does :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Alf
Quality - Even they are Laughing about it...:greengrin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Thanks guys. Most of the contracts will be up in the summer, so that's probably not a big issue. The second bit could be slightly worrying though. And they'll need the concept of "soap" explained to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Whizz
But these answers sound more promising :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Bostonhibby
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/sc...claims-5366096
RANGERS shareholder Mike Ashley has claimed his human rights are being violated by the publication of letters detailing his attempts to avoid appearing in front of a Commons committee.
The Sports Direct boss has been summoned by the Scottish Affairs Committee to explain the closure of the company’s USC business in Scotland and the use of zero-hours contracts
aye right, ashley knows all about human rights eh :bitchy:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Alf
What part/thread on their site? (don't want to have to look any further than I have to) Can you post a link?
Amusing stuff but pure guesswork from Phil Mac. He's just an irritating gossip and mischief-maker here - knows nothing but 'nudge nudge wink wink' he goes, trying to stir it up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozyhibby
Keith Hellawell now chief exec of Sports Direct??! A useless gobsh*te in every job he has had, yet he keeps getting another job. Jeez.Quote:
Originally Posted by cabbageandribs1875
It was their front page.... http://www.rangersmedia.co.ukQuote:
Originally Posted by sadtom
It's been changed to a holding page now though.
Basically it was a heading saying words to the effect "you've been hacked by Celtic FC" with the preview picture of a very, very, raunchy video.
:agree:
Ah Cheers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Just Alf
I see in the Herald this morning King has applied to the Court of Session to be a Director of the Rangers. What does that mean, legal guys? Is this a normal way of becoming a Director? I thought you were just appointed, I was in my company
Knowing nothing about anything I'm guessing it may be an attempt to circumvent the SFA's fit and proper test. Maybe not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Granton Stanton
DK being a director of RFC lays him open to prosecution, as he is potentially disqualified, having been a director of a company in liquidation with a similar name.Quote:
Originally Posted by Granton Stanton
I am guessing that this application is to try and have that law set aside in his case. As Spike says, if he is successful, he can use the Court approval as a way of supporting his SFA application.
I hope, though, that the judge asks him pertinent questions, like "where is the money coming from?" and "where's your NOMAD?".
Or "if you are such a big shot why did you not bail out the old rangers ?"Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Wee Bawwy preparing the ground for the impending failure of the New Huns, "we didnae want promotit anyway" :rolleyes:
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/f...ruggle-5367575
Not a single mention of Hibs in there
Typical rangers blinkers on
No mention of Falkirk or qots either
Both are better teams than rangers in my opinion
Time for all three of us to prove it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Springbank
I would love it, just love it, if The Rangers finish 5th. Wee Kevin Keegan reference for Mike Ashley there!
Arrogant fuds, fourth or fifth in the league is below us, so we'd be as well farting about in the Championship until we are truly ready to conquer the world again.
Why not start off by saying - it's doubtful we'll win promotion, so let's see how we can make it better?
Newsflash for Barry is that it is going to be some time before they can even dream of making the top six. They start from scratch again next year, and don't have a penny to sign new players. Their youth system is totally screwed. Yesterday's men.
I hope Barry Ferguson's opinion reveals a broader defeatism setting in at Ibrox. They should definitely stay in the Championship for another year.
fixed that for you! :aok:Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomoseven
Thanks, but a bit much to expect sustained realism from that lot!Quote:
Originally Posted by hoxtonhibby
And why is there not a penny of your own money on the table now?Quote:
Originally Posted by southsider