... and mind folks.
The next time you meet a jambo let them know about the 15,000+ tickets sold and with a big grin on your face say LOADSA MONEY - CAUSE WE ARE SO MUCH RICHER THAN YOUW
Printable View
... and mind folks.
The next time you meet a jambo let them know about the 15,000+ tickets sold and with a big grin on your face say LOADSA MONEY - CAUSE WE ARE SO MUCH RICHER THAN YOUW
Quote:
Originally Posted by jacomoseven
A Thousand-Year Reich?
The last one didn't last very long.
So if they cant make a decision for 2 weeks, which then starts the season, do they just get to play in the SPFL without giving any assurances they will survive.
I wonder when Doncaster is going to grow a set of balls and actually make a statement on this, or has he been to busy re-branding us to match england??
@STVSport: Hearts majority shareholder UBIG enters bankruptcy in Lithuania http://t.co/KlYSJUBeAt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leishy1995
Oh good, that makes everything OK then.
I don't actually know what it means. Was hoping someone would explain the possibilitiesQuote:
Originally Posted by keekaboo
Should Hearts get another 15 point penalty now that their parent company has suffered an insolvency event?
Hearts have told the SPFL that if they are not allowed to sign players they won't have enough of a squad to fulfil fixtures.
They are basically threatening to throw the league into chaos unless they are allowed to sign some players.
Supposedly Naysmith, Webster and Boyd are all ready to sign.
It's the only way we are safe with Pat in charge. :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by matty_f
No, I think they should get it just cos it'd be funny.Quote:
Originally Posted by matty_f
Where did you hear this?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
Who cares about hearts lets worry about hibs!
They've got a full u20 squad to choose from...Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
Me because what happens to our rivals is very important.Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisski33
Isn't that all the SPFL need to say "well, cheerio then"?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
You, since you came into a clearly marked thread about Hearts.Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisski33
Well the SPFL should grow a backbone and not let themselves be held to ransom by hearts!Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
A mate of Naysmith.
Yeah the SPFL should boot them out now, but can / will they?
It just means that the administrators of Ukio & UBIG can now jointly reject the joke CVAs and move straight to liquidation!Quote:
Originally Posted by Leishy1995
Tell them to **** off then :bye::bye:Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
Why view (and post on) a Hearts related thread then???? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisski33
IF they are allowed to sign players at any stage it won't include players of the age of Naysmith so a very pointless exercise if they are hanging around waiting to sign. Best they can hope for is under 21 players from January.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
Quote:
Originally Posted by desantos0773
OR.......
one of the oft mentioned reasons that a sale could not take place was that UBIG did not have an administrator appointed. Now they do.
Their argument is that they only have 20 players, 3 of which are goalies.
If they have a couple of injuries at any stage they then don't have enough players to make up a match day squad.
What can the league do other than allow some sort of concession?
@bbcscotfoot: Hearts: Lithuanian court declares parent company UBIG insolvent
http://t.co/4hhT9smX6g
There is nothing to suggest at this stage that the assets will suddenly be unfrozen. The reason they were frozen in the first place was to stop them being sold off in an attempt to hide any wrongdoing. This doesn't change that. I expect nothing else from Brian Mclauchlin though, he's the one who told us just before the League Cup Final that Hearts were on the verge of being sold to a fans group.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hermit Crab
He's a fat lying yam roaster, a slightly less mistaken Barry Anderson
We wishQuote:
Originally Posted by matty_f
Short answer is "naw". IIRC, the parent company provisions were introduced to prevent a club hiding behind its parent's insolvency, by shifting debt around.
So basically, what there's saying is "we demand that you don't punish us for cheating by signing players on inflated wages we can't afford and instead allow us to continue cheating by signing players on inflated wages we can't afford."Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
I think the SPFL's response will be something like this..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvdf5n-zI14
So three sanctions open to SFA after Hearts entering insolvency.Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
1. Fine.........Bryan Jackson " any financial penalty could be fatal for Hearts"
2. Extended registration embargo.........."hearts won't be able to fulfil fixtures"
3. Censure
Administrators playing a good game for the cheats I'll give them that.
I would like to think the SFA wouldn't be fooled by this blatant attempt at manipulating their sanction but I'm not so sure. An extended embargo should really be the order of the day as per Dunfermline(they can sign U 21s after all) but I have a feeling that a piddly little fine of £50k or so wouldn't be that damaging to Hearts currently as they would find a way to pay it so they might be backtracking there.
The SFA will find a punishment that isn't a punishment, that is their way.
Let them play youth players. In theory, could a team not field a 15 year old if they thought he was good enough?Quote:
Originally Posted by WhileTheChief..
In their case though it would be a case of having to field him cos they've no other option.