They won't be, its a gamble and the administrators have told them as much.
Printable View
Does anyone know if it has been confirmed if these wage cuts are wage deferrals or are actual cuts?
I would bet that, however many they sell, the admin guys will put a "brave face" on it and battle one. UKIO wanted them in for a reason, and that will be to wring as much as possible out of the carcass.
Absolutely gobsmacked at this post.......
john brownlee
Season Ticket Holder
Registered Users A
3,112 posts
Posted Today, 18:57
I said that weeks ago that this was my biggest fear they would hit us hard ....with a big fine, transfer embargo, a limit of some sorts(make it up as you go along) and the possible rejection of our new owner, now they had their fingers burnt with hundead....... and they need something to keep the orcas on their side........What they should be doing is give us back the money they took of us/ mr Romanov under false pretences as we all know now he was speaking the truth........ GFA SPL scootish football it all stinks and is corrupt to the core.........
Saw this on Brokeback, has to be a troll surely.
How much does sperm donation pay?
Surley we could raise a few £k in the next few weeks by making our own donations.
Not everybody will be up for it ( so to speak )
But its always been a viable option for many people to raise quick cash.
You lost me at "Tom English"
He appears to have given up the ghost as a journalist in 2013
A big juicy story and angles galore was waiting for him ("jambos, does the sight of admin girls in tears at being made redundant still make you feel it was all worth it / untainted etc")
Instead, hashtag all is Barry all is white knights all is No Lessons Learned
Poor excuse for a journalist
Found a tenner in my back pocket, wondered if I could buy Hearts, and then realised that I dont have a scooby do what happens if Hearts get to the point of a CVA. :dunno:
Basically who has to buy what off whom? :confused:, and can the 'sellers' choose lower bids if they consider them 'friendly'. And does the football club own any percentage of itself, or is it all owned by UBIG, UKIO and other groups - if that is even a valid question...
No wonder these Yams thought they owed it all to themselves. What a mess. :ill:
In brighter news for Jambos, someone finally did manage to carry Nade.
That article on bbc from Jackson is stomach churning... Stinks of last years pish from the Huns 'the fans have been through enough'... The fans have profited for years of over spending and watching a modicum of success on that basis... The fans egged them on when everyone else said it was doomed to failure... The fans are a bunch of superiority complex, deluded idiots. They can go get to ******...
Apologies for the rant but that 'its no our fault' baws does my box in!!
You may well be right wrt English, the point was more about McKie stressing the importance of being out of admin and able to sign players before the 31st Aug.
Maybe a fine might reduce whatever player budget they have, I think I'd prefer the signing ban as I can see them getting over a fine somehow.
To be honest I see, say a year long transfer ban, as a much harder punishment. A fine would just be added to the pile. What's £100k when you owe £30million plus? However a whole season, with the band of kids and huddies they've got, stick ons for relegation, their fans will stop turning up, and any new owner will be looking on seeing them having to potentially fund the club through 2 seasons in the First Division.
That Jackson is pretty much outright begging for the ban is interesting. Not sure how a fine would work, but it would seem unlikely the SFA would expect them to pay it up straight away, but presumably a new bill would empty the biscuit tin and force them into liquidation, so even though a hefty transfer ban pretty much dooms them, it seems he is being forced to think so short term just to keep them rolling on that it's the lesser threat.
I would imagine the coming transfer ban probably takes everyone but FOH out of the equation, and since they are a bunch of potless time wasters, liquidation surely looms.
This all assumes that the SFA don't dump them out the SPL or something 'drastic' like that.
I'm going to break ranks here and say that Jackson is right.
What is the point of fining the Yams when they have no money to pay? An extended transfer ban such as Dunfermline got is a punishment that will have a real effect by leaving them with a very weak squad and will have a longer lasting effect by guaranteeing their relegation next summer.
And since such a ban looks likely to kill off the McKie consortium's interest, the picture looks even better.
This seems to be the Brian Kennedy model. Go public with your interest and brag about how credible and wealthy you are, but then make a bid on the condition that all debts and sanctions are cleared.
When your bid gets refused because its utterly unfeasible, bleat publicly about it.
As Hearts can't afford to pay a fine, there seems little alternative to an extended signing ban if further sanctions come their way.
We have to consider all these fools who are buying season tickets to watch a pile of pish on the park beat every week feel the pain the more the beter relegated before Santa comes:aok: 13k sadists and Lockes plastic gimp suit in taters:na na:
FoH gone a bit quiet the last few days unless I've missed something. Maybe Murray's call for a pledge from each supporter has resulted in them being sent furniture polish. You still can't polish a bloodied turd though.