Major disrespect to the div3 teams.Perhaps every SPL team should loan Berwick a player for a year for free.See how long we can keep them down for.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieross
Printable View
Major disrespect to the div3 teams.Perhaps every SPL team should loan Berwick a player for a year for free.See how long we can keep them down for.Quote:
Originally Posted by jamieross
What have berwick ever done to you that you would wish any of our players on them?:greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Greendrongo
BBC reporting that broad agreement has been reached on membership. Hopefully it's as spot on as there reporting has been throughout this delightful little saga:wink:
I have no idea why I follow him so don't ask.
On Twitter saying he's sent a text to Charles Green to say he'll play for Sevco for free!! Prick!!
For goodness sake, this crap should have been sorted out many weeks ago. Instead the so-called administrators of our game have dragged their feet, primarily to avoid any harm to Rangers. Whilst, at the same time the reputation of Scottish football or more accurately its ghost is been dragged through the slime that is Rangers and we're all supposed to look the other way if we can't applaud
He's a knob. Think ill unfollow him after the pish he's been saying tonight. Offering to play for free at The Huns. Why no play for a team that would actually need a player like him. Im sure Berwick would take him.
Isnt Twitter just for celebs, schoolkids and those folk who are on The Only Way is Essex? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by 3pm
I agree it should have been sorted out months ago. But its not the fault of the football authorities.Quote:
Originally Posted by calmac12000
Think Sir David Murray, although he did his best to try and sell the rancid club for years before he duped White.
Think Snow White himself
Think Duff and Duffer - and all the false bidders and false dawns and missed deadlines.
Think of Yorkshire puddings (with gravy mmmmmmmmmm) holding out for unreasonably lenient entry to SPL, SFL and now the SFA.
Its only them that are to blame - no one else.
Yuk, can you go lower than that offer? Well I suppose he could offer post-match massages with 'extras' (shudders at thought)
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3pm
Depends what you want from it. I use it as a news feed and to collate my interests in one place so that I can follow up any articles which catch my eye. Certainly wouldn't indulge attention seeking idiots like Robbie Savage though.Quote:
Originally Posted by easty
Ian Black's agent due at Ibrox tomorrow to finalise his move to #Rangers. Deal a substantial increase on what he was on at #Hearts.
Absolutely disgusting
They're clearly getting help from somewhere.Quote:
Originally Posted by CallumLaidlaw
He's not wrong, though. Could probably still do a job in the SPL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Greendrongo
I know you're only kidding about loaning a team a player for a year, but they'd still win the league easy.
They're gambling on getting decent crowds. It's a tricky one for Green, he's got to try and prove he's serious about putting a decent team on the park to win favour with the orcs. Plus they've got to get players in now who can win Div2 at a canter because they'll still be embargoed next summer. Any hint of a struggle and the moaning from the Huns will be unprecedented. They are the biggest set of spoilt *******s in world football.Quote:
Originally Posted by wee_hibee
I expect them to cruise up through the divisions but there is still plenty that could go wrong for them, so fingers crossed.
Is this now Day 6 of the "negotiations"?
Does anyone have any insight into what exactly is being negotiated?
IMHO they will be discussing the detail of how the SFA & SPL will be softening the blow further down the line for RFC with promises of league reconstruction to fast-track their route to the top, how they will "guarantee :wink:" at least 2 Celtic matches a year, how the favouring system of referees will be managed in Div 3, the "commission" going to Regan and Doncaster for facilitating RFC's recovery.Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
How exactly Regan and Doncaster are still involved in this scandal beggers belief. I'm surprised politicians haven't waded in to get these crooks removed from their positions, but then again, I'm not.
I'm sure that there would be plenty of players in SFL3 who would welcome the opportunity to bring him down to size. He thinks he's hard - but he ain't seen nothing!Quote:
Originally Posted by 3pm
Confuses me slightly that Sevco have to accept the sanctions for the dual contracts, that is surely an oldco deal? Titles will be stripped from the oldco, newco should have no recourse on it :confused:
Latest "insider" stuff (no idea how true) from RTC blog suggests the outcome will be:Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
- Registration embargo for one year from Sep 1 (as widely trailed).
- Dual contract investigation shelved until tax FTT result is known.
- Given FTT result and investigation both find OldHuns guilty, titles may be stripped from OldHuns but ...
- No further sanctions from OldHuns misdeeds to be attached to NewHuns.
- NewHuns to pay outstanding football debts of OldHuns.
- NewHuns don't get OldHuns money for 2nd place finish last season.
I think that's all fair enough. There should certainly be a stripping of any affected titles, but apart from that - let them get on with it. I'm not sure why the dual contract investigation should be shelved though if it's to have no real impact on Newco? :dunno: Well, apart from Sally quitting, likes :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footbal...6908-23912291/
Don't know if its just Green/Daily record bullsh*t but it seems the SFA are to set up a tribunal to overrule FIFA and force clubs to compensate the " People ".
Also read somewhere else the OldCo are refusing to transfer their SPL share to Dundee until they get what they want from the negotiations ? :confused:
It has become the focal point for the Hun hordes. Green has to keep them onside but even the SPL can't back down on this one so a convenient delay while he tries to sell some season tickets and the chance to "blame" the result on the judges of the FTT suits both parties.Quote:
Originally Posted by BarneyK
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Negotiations.
The point surely is that Sevco5088 do not have anything to bargain with, so how can there be any 'negotiations'?
Speechless.
:sofa:
They'll have to prove the illegality of the so-called broken contracts before they're due a penny, and the concensus seems to be that they are pissing against the wind with that one. And given the SFA don't seem to have a clue regarding the legalities of the whole situation, it sounds doubtful they'd be getting involved. You ever get the impression Chuckie just makes stuff up...Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Theoretically they have their brand and large support as bargaining tools, but given they actually have nowehere else to go, it's really just sabre rattling. As usual, the Scottish media is doing all to help them though.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnrebus
So Rangers (whether NewCo or OldCo) are to get away with 10 years of cheating and all they will suffer is a meaningless retrospective adjustment of the record books. They knowingly withheld information on their players' contracts from the SPL and will get away with it, when lowly Spartans were thrown out of the Scottish Cup for an administrative error. This is not right. And they get the benefits of the OldCo connection - i.e. direct entry to the SFL. I'd be interested in the HMRC view of the requirement for NewCo to selectively pay some of the creditors of OldCo. Stinks.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
QC to face criminal charges for failing to pay HMRC £600k VAT - wonder if Whyte will ever be brought to account?
http://blog.cps.gov.uk/2012/07/queen...vat-fraud.html
I'm sure its been said before but ....
The SFA should say these are the conditions of entry, take it or leave it.
As for the alleged refusal to transfer the share. Cancel it and make up a new one.
I don't think that Newco in law have any obligation to pay any of the creditors, the fact that they may have to would be purely down to an SFA condition for license. It's not fair of course, but there you go. Equally, it's not right that they (for we know it's still them) get away with the dual contracts. That said, there's not much can be done to Oldco, and it could be argued that it has nowt to do with Newco. There is still of course the grey area of whether they retain the history of Oldco. If they do, then surely they should have to embrace the punishments for wrongdoing of the Oldco? I think there's a little bit on both sides of folk wanting their cake and eating it. We want them to lose their history and still to be punished for it, whilst they want to retain their history, while washing their hands of any punishment resulting from it.Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
I can't see how that makes sense. If the SFA tribunal decide Whittaker is worth £2m and they 'order' Norwich to pay it, what if Norwich say no? They have absolutely no power over English clubs and if they refuse to release the player's registration them presumably FIFA can overrule them.Quote:
Originally Posted by greenginger
Regarding the share, they're not in a position to refuse to transfer it, the SPL can simply transfer it for them without needing any action by D&P.
So now the SFA are going to help Rangers obtain money they're not entitled to under TUPE law? This beggars belief.Quote:
Originally Posted by Caversham Green