No point really. Waste of money. No talent in there anymore. Get rid asap.
Printable View
This is the first time an s35 has been used in the lifetime of the Scottish Parliament. Hardly indicative of regular, overbearing Westminster meddling. In this instance though I can't see that the UK government had any choice but to call out flawed legislation.
It's not, it's a legal and competency issue. Make some amendments and it's all good.
I fully expect it to be framed as you have done a lot over the next few days and no doubt it's yet another reason for Independence, but I suspect like every other issue that has come before this one it also won't make any difference to Independence.
https://twitter.com/labourrichard/st...2ckL0F60SnLGrA
First comment from Labour I’ve seen?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trans issue will be hijacked for the next few months to boost independence. If its legal the courts will decide and it will correctly stand, if not it will correctly get binned.
Win for the lawyers and politicians. Most public probably don't care
I think it was hijacked in the service of the union today. I don’t believe for a minute Jack give a hoot about any of the issues involved.
I agree the public don’t care much about the issue though. They do care about the parliament though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not sure they do care about the Parliament. What they care about is getting an ambulance, cared for in old age, good schools, properly looked after in hospital, access to a dentist, security of income when support of the state is needed, law and order, decent transport, good roads etc etc.
It's up to the government and Parliament to deliver that. If the Scottish version can't do it well enough then an alternative needs to be found.
It'd be good if the SG could focus on the core devolved matters to the same extent it seems to have this issue.
Jack wont personally, but if it isn't legal they will have
to get involved. Theres hundreds of laws scot gov has passed that uk gov hasn't touched.
Doubt your average person does care about parliament, most are against parts of this law. I think the majority think all mps/msps are ***** to be honest.
You are a bit detached from reality if you think people are waking up caring about the Parliament. I have said on here numerous times people care about their health, their job and for example why aren't their kids at school today.
I am sure you have said similar for a while and everytime it amounts to nothing.
The biggest threat to all the issues you've mentioned, and any others you could mention, is the Conservative Party. Unfortunately, that's the reality everyone in Scotland is having to deal with. They've been an unmitigated disaster for our society and only show signs of getting worse.
That's a valid opinion that you and many others hold, the problem you have is just being angry at the Tories isn't enough. The alternative offering needs to be clear, I really don't think that is the case in Scotland, it's clear in rUK the alternative is Labour in power. If your way out is Independence then a few leaflets isn't cutting through the way the SNP probably wanted it to.
Anyway this is about the GRA.
Yikes, a car crash interview from Maggie Chapman of the Greens. That won't help the SG if anyone was listening to that.
https://youtu.be/TDRyJzPUAKg
Also when pressed said we should be exploring allowing 8 year old children to legally change their gender.
I can't help but feel the Greens (a party supposedly set up to protect the environment) have been swept up in this by a group of trans activists and now the SNP are part of it due to their coalition agreement. I mean 8 year olds?
https://twitter.com/peatworrier/stat...Y7Pk0bocvinkIA
Interesting thread on why a s35 order was used.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a toe-curling listen. Scary in fact. Aside from the alarming stuff about eight-year-olds, her attempt to back up her assertion that sex is not binary amounted to incoherent nonsense when asked the straightforward question: "Can you point to an example of a human being changing their biological sex?"
https://twitter.com/peston/status/16...Y7Pk0bocvinkIA
Nothing from Starmer yet? He was all about devolving power away from Westminster last week?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Good point. Sometimes I reply to a comment in a thread and it goes off tangent and I forget the thread is about something else entirely. :greengrin
On the subject of this thread, i'm surprised there's still so much confusion surrounding this bill and what it actually means. I still see arguments against the bill which have no relation to the bill itself and actually date back to the Scotland Equality Act of 2010. There appears to be a great deal of concern for laws that these people don't realize have been in place for over 12 years now.
It was infuriating to hear Keir Starmer today accuse the Scottish Government of using the Gender Recognition Reform bill as a "political football", when that's exactly what he is planning to do in tandem with the Conservative Party. Anything to try and gain an upper arm with a fringe minority south of the border. They are playing with people's lives.