They don't, though. There is a clause in the SFL Rules that says that ANY new entrant has to start in D3. So... a yes to Resolution 1 has them in the SFL. A No to Resolution 2 avoids the possibility of negotiation into D1. So they start in D3.
Printable View
You're not missing anything. Resolutions 1 and 2 have been carefully crafted by an evil lawyer and are intended to be misleading. The only way this can be fixed is for the clubs to propose an amendment to Resolution 1 before voting. It should be amended so that it says that Sevco are to be admitted to the SFL at Division 3. Resolution 2 can then be safely binned. However, I don't know if the rules for an SFL Special General Meeting allow amendments to be made at the meeting. If they do not then the clubs either have to go along with this evil plan or vote not to allow the huns into the SFL at all. That's been the plan all along because Longmuir, Regan and Donkey think that there's no way the clubs will do that.
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/332109
Concessions now being offered by Chuckie Green.
" Let us sign players for the rest of July then we will agree to a signing ban. " :rolleyes:
You could not make it up !
The solution to the second 'story' is to allow Sevco Huns to die, and not replace them so the SPL has 11 teams, and they play each other twice at home and twice away, no need for the split making a 40 game season. It also doesn't impact on the SFL fixtures. That also gives a full season to get a proper solution and allow the clubs like Spartans a chance to get a presentation for joining the league prepared, all for the end of the season.
Something I don't understand... If all these prophecies of financial Armageddon are accurate, how come our club (one of the most financially aware clubs in the SPL) are still signing players?
I'm sick and tired of these scare stories in the red tops, what a load of selective, one-sided, self preserving drivel.
Best line of that article..."This is neither scaremongering or rumours..."
You couldn't make this stuff up :faf: :faf: :faf:
So, for my simple brain, resolutionwise, as currently drafted:-
a) if clubs vote NO to resolution 1, the matter ends and Sevco do not get into the SFL anywhere and there is no resolution 2
b) if clubs vote YES to resolution 1, Sevco will be placed into the SFL and we move to resolution 2
c) if clubs vote NO to resolution 2, Sevco are in Division 3
d) if clubs vote YES to resolution 2, the SFL have the discretion to put them in Division 1
And in all cases it is a straight majority vote
Is that all right? :dunno:
For the accountants...
Duff & Phelps report
http://www.rangers.co.uk/staticFiles...~177826,00.pdf
Unfortunately, part (c) is not so cut and dried. If they vote no to resolution (ii) it is then removed from the equation and you are left with the YES vote for resolution (i). Resolution (i) does not stipulate Div. 3 so Rangers could (with a bit of rule bending) be placed anywhere in the SFL.