Then those ex servicemen evidently aren't the target of the joke then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
Printable View
Then those ex servicemen evidently aren't the target of the joke then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
It's not a joke...not even funny ... I actually find the comment crass and insulting to be honest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Boy
Oh well.Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
I actually find the alt right types (the actual target of the joke) who have politicised the poppy and are planning to protest against wearing masks crass and insulting so I suppose we're even.
Does anyone else think we might actually see less flu cases this year, given the increased awareness of good hand hygiene, keeping a safe distance and cleaning surfaces? Previously, I don't think there was that much awareness promoted on how to reduce your risk of catching flu other than to get the annual flu jab.Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Boy
I suppose the main concern this Winter is going to be differentiating between who has flu, covid or the common cold .
I support the Royal British Legion or Poppy Scotland and I wear a poppy in the act of Rememberance for the fallen ...I hate anything that hijacks thr legion which is apolitical ...suppose it's like the twats..... putting yes on my countries saltire flag..... So yeah I suppose we are evenQuote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Boy
It is a joke; whether you find it funny is subjective but it's quite a stretch to find it insulting IMO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
The humour is intended to be derived from the likelihood that the kind of person who would lambast a stranger for not wearing a poppy is the same kind of person as would make a point of refusing to wear a mask. Whilst there is no doubt some irony in that, it's not a comment on ex-service personnel or the poppy cause.
Also stolen from twitter: apparently Desmond Swayne went on so long his suit came back into fashion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colr
Way to miss the point. Service personnel don’t generally harass people for not wearing poppies. “Tommy Robinson” types do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
Yes, think you’re right. I also think there’s going to be a bigger than usual flu jab drive to try and relieve nhs pressure coming from that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa Cruz
To be fair, as it’s all the same people, they can protect the statues while they are there.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colr
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then why even bring wearing poppies into it. The subject is face coverings.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
The subject is "roasters who manipulate perfectly reasonable stuff for reasons of pursuing a questionable agenda."Quote:
Originally Posted by Berwickhibby
The poppy has, sadly, been hijacked by these roasters and turned into something different in the eyes of many to the genuine, proper thing that it was meant to represent, that it once did represent - although something that it clearly still does represent to you and many others.
The people who have done this will inevitably be the same people who will be seeking to do the same with facemasks.
Your enemies here are the Tommy Robinsons more than those who have taken a resultant distaste to the symbol.
The buses going past my house don't seem to contain many mask-wearers. Folk seem to be behaving in shops though.
Where are we with cancer screening? Hopefully getting back up towards normal service?
There is far too many deaths in England getting registered too late. Hospital deaths in last 24 hours were 5 with a total of 26. Of these one of them were in May.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir David Gray
The reporting is way out still.
This will be fun, I thought I'd be clever and get to the barber at 7.10am thinking I'd get in early, there were 5 people outside and 2 inside, looks like my mop is staying a bit longer
Breast screening is still to resume at all unfortunately but there was an announcement on Monday that people would "slowly" begin to receive invitations from 13th July and the screening programme itself was to restart on 3rd August.Quote:
Originally Posted by Glory Lurker
Anyone who had a cervical screening appointment before the lockdown or was due to make an appointment could make an appointment from 29th June and letters were going out as of 13th July.
https://www.gov.scot/news/breast-can...ing-to-resume/
On my first bus since early March (cut it too fine to walk to work).
The bus driver isn’t wearing a mask.
Surely of all people he should be?
So far every passenger has had one on.
Read somewhere, as the driver is behind a protective screen, it is not required. Same applies in Retail.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
Hmmmmm. Ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa Cruz
Were the London bus drivers who died not behind screens?
My barber has started appointments only for now, 8am Saturday for me 😁Quote:
Originally Posted by Mon Dieu4
More than likely, I would think the problem was the passengers were not wearing face coverings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
I actually think they should wear them, and hope they are given the option for their own personal safety if they are not confident the screen provides enough protection.
But the drivers wearing masks wouldn't be for their own personal safety. It'd be for the passengers' safety.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa Cruz
Correct, bus drivers are exempt whilst driving the bus but if they go to help someone get on/off the bus then they should wear one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Santa Cruz
I understand the point you're making. I'm assuming here that the risk assessment has taken account that the screen they sit behind along with the fact they are socially distanced from passengers is seen as sufficient mitigations.Quote:
Originally Posted by lapsedhibee
Isn't he sat behind plexiglass and is pretty much guaranteed a safe social distance from others?Quote:
Originally Posted by Smartie
I'm absolutely gobsmacked that there still seems to be misconceptions on why masks are necessary. I was talking to 2 ladies yesterday who refused to wear masks. The central point of their argumentation was that if I'm wearing a mask then why should they have to wear a mask for my and other's protection? There's no talking to stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by lapsedhibee
Exactly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibrandenburg
We all know that wearing a mask can be uncomfortable, restrict breathing a bit, steam up specs, etc. I'd rather keep professional drivers as comfortable and as unrestricted as possible so they can concentrate on the road. They're fine behind their perspex.
I’m sure the shield will provide a substantial risk reduction, but more and more we’re learning about the airborne transmission of the virus. For all they are behind a shield, there will be air exchange with the rest of the bus. Doors opening and closing will provide an air exchange but I think I’d be wanting to wear a mask whilst sitting in an enclosed space, shield or no shield.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibrandenburg
They come into contact with lots of people so their chances of encountering an infected individual will be higher than average.
I guess I’m getting a bit neurotic. I’d vowed not to go on public transport for a while and so it was a bit alarming when the first person I encountered was a driver not wearing a mask.
FWIW the bus was very quiet, considering it was a number 22 at 8:30am in a restricted service going from Leith up into town - certainly compared to “normal”.
My concern is a few months ago we were advised that masks did nothing. I found that advice ridiculous as it seemed common sense that a face covering could at least reduce the risk of passing on the virus.
Now there is growing noises on the virus potentially being airborne? Do we wait for confirmation or just reduce our risks ourselves.
I'm not going anywhere near a plane until I know a lot more.