I think, when it comes to Hearts, a promise of money is as good as the real thing. Just wait until they head over to Lithuania with £6, a bag of sweets and 3000 £70 pledges from A. Kidd.
Printable View
I'm expecting half a dozen e-mails and I havenae had one yet. :grr:
:greengrin
1. What A Fool Believes - The Doobie Brothers - all Jambos
2. World shut Your Mouth - Julian Cope - Fedetovas
3. Eve of Destruction - Barry McGuire - Lithuanian Administrators
4. Embarrassment - Madness - HMFC
5. Say Hello Wave Goodbye - Soft Cell - Please
6. Panic - The Smiths - The Orwell Lodge and other Yam watering holes
7. Mysterious Times - Sash - Where's the money gone?
8. The Question is What is the Question - Scooter - Do you know?
9. Time to Say Goodbye - Andrea Bocelli - Please hurry
10. Cap in Hand - The Proclaimers - What the Yams will be soon.
I'm sure everyone has their own top 10. Go on guys and gals have some fun:greengrin
Nae email for Hugh G Dick either :grr: suppose it would help if I'd access to the email I gave though :greengrin
Good one, the irony is just too much. Mr White and Mr Green put Rangers out of business and then A. Kidd turns his attention to Heart of Midlothian to break their hearts. A lot of kids lost out on Christmas last year and are still awaiting their wall poster / certificate to remind them of that fact. They better hurry up at the printing press because the 10 days appeal period is nearly up. Goodness knows where Ubig parent club are going to find the money to stave off administration and a potential points deduction for their Scottish subsidiary or what should be called their subsidy. Sunday is derby day, it could be Hearts last chance to try and beat us for a while. :flag:
No More Heroes - The Stanglers
Panic! - The Smiths
Wind of Change - Scorpions
Vladimir's Ga Ga - Queen
Suspicious Minds - Elvis
If you don't know me by now - Simply Red
I promised you a Miracle - Simple Minds
sheriff vladman - Carter USM
You're unbelievable - EMF
#allisbarry they are here ! ...... Not really actually
I love a hibee top ten pop songs #allveryHiFi
I'd vote:
Ship of fools - erasure
Liths will tear us apart, again - nae joy division (aka div 3)
Your cheating heart will tell on you - big O
Kiddie fiddler on the roof - topol feat. Rix/Thomson
Such generosity, can only hope they have the decency to write, especially the MP. I imagine all of his non yam constituents must be delighted to see where his time is going and that he has not put his own interests first.:greengrin
Haven't got that all important winning email yet, but suppose one really has to stick at it, you've got to be in it to win it.
Mind they were filtering out all the obvious Hibs pledges. If you want the email you'll need to be less obvious...
The accounts have arrived today
Not that I've got an in depth knowledge of such matters, but is the highlighted section not a qualification? I'm aware of the fact that future events that will have a paramount impact on the company need to be taken into account, but could the insolvency events in lith have been "conveniently ignored" for the purposes of signing off an audit?
Technically emphasis of matter is different from a qualification. The auditor gives an opinion on whether the accounts (including the attached notes) show a true and fair view. A qualified opinion says either they do not give a tafv or that the auditor is unsure whether they do or not. An unqualified report with emphasis of matter says the accounts do give a tafv but the reader should pay particular attention to the bit that's emphasised.
It's because of the events in Lithuania that I'm surprised at the unqualified report. The auditor would be negligent in ignoring them and Ukio's insolvency is mentioned, but I think they're significant enough to warrant more attention than they've got. I would have felt inclined to give an uncertainty qualification and I'm sure the auditor must have given that a lot of consideration.
The going concern note is quite non-commital really and the auditor is depending on that to say what he would otherwise have said in a qualification, so strictly he's probably right to say the accounts are accurate subject to the conditions contained in the note, but it can't have been a comfortable decision for him.
It depends on the circumstances. Their involvement would always be considered but if the cause of the breast elevation could not have been reasonably foreseen or is covered in the accounts and emphasis of matter they'd probably be in the clear.