It is certainly not good...
Printable View
Thanks. Looks very messy. You can see with the players and coaching staff salary liabilities and the reduced income from season ticket sales and match day income they are in trouble. Budge and directors in for a big hit. Only way out is voluntary admin. No wonder she has been going radge.
Voluntary admin would get the directors off hook for the players wages. The Motherwell admin in the end found players wages were football debts after court action. Those liabilities bigger than the loans she has to the club. The shares and FOH money could be complicated legally. Admins would look for a buyer. Someone might offer Budge more than the FOH money, Gillet, and takeover the football debts. That is probably her best out
Hearts are going into the championship next season with the same players they had this season. Very little chance of moving any of them on in the current market. And after the bodged wage cut negotiations the atmosphere between players and club will be strained to say the least.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What I don't get is why hold back on the transfer of ownership when she's supposed to be continuing to run the show afterwards anyway? Is it a control things as she won't have quite the same authority after the transfer has taken place?
The story given is as it's because they want to have a big celebration when it happens but that seems a bit odd. What does it matter if you complete the process now but wait and have the party when it is possible to do so? All seems a bit strange.
https://www.edinburghlive.co.uk/spor...e-set-18333226
They're due to pay back a loan of £1m to a director & other loans totalling £2m next month.
At end June 2019 they owed trade creditors £2.3m more than they were owed by trade debtors. Our trade debtors exceeded our trade creditors by £600k.
At end June 2019 they had £600k in the bank. We had £5.5m
None of the above is good for Hearts.
They turned around a negative cash flow of £5.3m in 2018 to a positive of £392k this year but that was as a result of nearly £2m (net) in donations.
These numbers are now nearly a year old. Their finances may have improved but as their revenue last year included a cup final & semi final & increased attendances at Murrayfield I doubt their gate income can have increased. If these were our numbers I would be concerned.
No, only to reduce their wages. They have already taken those cuts and the agreement was the relegation cuts were based on their original agreement. Even if it’s as high as a 25% cut then they still won’t be able to earn more elsewhere post covid.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
There f***** could not happen to nicer people let's not forget what the fat Tory b****** tried to do to us I wont let them die.
Tick tock tick tock