Aye. I say so :greengrin
Printable View
http://translate.googleusercontent.c...C-q5IaB2uzUoUw
Confirming Sergey's info of 24 hours ago.
No doubt the newspapers will catch up by Tuesday.
UB lend £22m to UBIG to clear HMFC debt to HBOs then lend £15m direct to HMfC & £10m UBIG to finance £25m of further debt run up under Romanov from wages/transfer fees. UBIG convert £22m of debt to HMFC in 2008 & 2010 to equity and give equity to UB as security. UN owed directly £47m by UB & HMFC.
Oooft :greengrin
UN a typo should be UB. Not difficult to follow. Current debt of HMfC £25m. £22m converted to equity by UBIG in 2008 & 2010. But UBIG still owe the £22m to UB that's why the UB hold the 79% equity or shares in HMFC. In short UB have lost £47m to HMFC directly or indirectly. And they'll settle with getting £2m!
And the forgiveness debts, £ 8.8 million forgiven by Natborg Projects Corp. and £ 5.9 million forgiven by ImpExNet in the 2011 accounts. :confused:
Any idea where that debt is supported from ? I just don't get the idea that companies debts can be shunted off up a siding and forgotten about.They may be off the Yams books but UBIG or Ukio Bankas must have taken the financial hit for the losses.
UB have taken the hit they have either lent to UBIG or directly to HMFC. UBIG just a front to pass funds from UB to Romanov's projects (HMFC, Kaunas.
, basketball, sports stadium). That's why UB have a £300 million gap between assets and liabilities (loans) which had to be filled by Lithuanian state borrowing that money to keep depositors and good loans of UB afloat so could be transferred to other bank. UB losses to HMFC are 17% of that hole. The administrator will want to get as much of that money back as possible. Remember HMFC signed a deal to sell Tynie to Cala homes. While the administrators Willmot raise the sum agreed back then it is the route which will maximise he money they recover from HMFC.