Why would we only sign them on a 6 month loan? Would that not be a bit silly?
Printable View
Hibs are one of a few teams interested in talking to josh mceachran according to a mate who knows him.im in no doubt about my source.👍
A few teams in england interested as well,had to have a look to see who he is.
Seems the type we have been trying to get in.came through at chelsea not really kicked on from initial promise.
Never seen him play myself.26yrs old just released from brentford.
Mate says he plays the holding role.
Mainly injuries since he's been at Brentford. Although he's been fit for most of this season and started as first choice(28 games) and was in really good form.
He was replaced by a more defensive minded player when Smith left to manage Villa. The new Brentford manager doesn't seem to fancy him at all.
He's at a good age too 26. It would be a risky signing in one sense but it could also be a fantastic signing if he holds up fitness wise.
Josh mceachran would be an incredible signing.
NHC but I see that Andy Carroll has been released by West Ham - insane to think that he cost £10M more than Liverpool paid for Suarez that transfer window in January 2011.
Since then (club football only):
Carroll
132 starts
45 goals
Suarez
363 starts
259 goals
David Nugent anyone lol
Sorry if this has been posted/discussed already. From Hibspage on Facebook. I hope it's not fake.
Attachment 22087
Was reading it as starters. From that perspective I think it's fair enough - four starters signed would be ace.
We do need cover but I guess the trick is that we need good, cheap and prepared not to be first choice (unless we're dropping one of the current defense down the pecking order). Like you say it's tough..... If Porteous, McGregor and Hanlon all stay fit we've got a good Central defence but equally you could have all three injured and we're ****ed.