Daughter/son-in-law back in the news again;
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy79q7ej49yo
Printable View
Daughter/son-in-law back in the news again;
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy79q7ej49yo
Their sense of entitlement shines through, they really can't see how this looks or accept they might have done something wrong / amoral.
Wonder if anyone else associated with them has been allowed to continue with the charity or be anywhere near the funds?
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
I don’t believe in the afterlife but if there is one, oh to be a fly on the heavenly wall when the daughter meets her dad again.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c86qdq67dd5o
Gosh, who’d have thunk it?
£1.4m in book sales not going to charitable causes.
The whole world really did go mad didn't it?
An old guy walking about his garden became a national celebrity, Joe Wicks became moderately less annoying and people wanted an animal torturer who tried to arrange the murder of a rival pardoned by the US President:faf:
Compared to greed, Covid was a walk in the park to deal with.
The daughter seems to having trouble selling their house
https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https...fhw&__tn__=R*F
What a shame.
Also read in their the foundation is closing down - where will the money go?
What a bunch of *****.
That depends on its constitution. Normally, a charity will have a clause that stipulates what mechanism is in place. A common scenario is that the Board of Trustees decide to donate it to "x charity".
If there have been grants received, any unspent portions would normally be due back to the funder.