Do you think it would be wise for a rep, to start talking tactics or about games/manager on a forum?
The other side of that is that I'm a bit of a Luddite so don't do social media. I go to all home games and and probably about a quarter of away games, give or take. Do my own thing in terms of pre match (generally Joseph Pearce) and travelling to away games.
So speaking for myself and my group of season ticket holders Hibs.net and the official site is where we get all our updates from. I was at McDirmiad Park early on sat so saw who I assumed to be Tracy and Frank standing outside the main stand entrance with Dempster & Petrie, but otherwise couldn't pick them out of a lineup.
How typical I am of the general support, who knows. However I'm fairly skeptical of the role of fans reps thus far. Tracy has been semi visible on here in general, but no idea what Frank has done or said. So for me the whole EBT statement fiasco has disengaged me further from the point of having fans rep roles. The first issue I've actively wanted to hear about, even just updates to say "it's still being worked on and looked at by all about involved" would have satisfied me. It came across as the first real time a fans rep role was in place for the barricades went up and it was back to a feeling of us v them.
As I said, maybe I'm an anomaly and there's not a huge portion of the support being missed like myself. Tracy/Frank, I play 5s on a Thursday night welcome to pop by each week and keep me personally abreast 😀 Haha
.
Thing is though Skol - we elected our reps to represent the consensus of Hibs supporters in the boardroom to the best of their ability . I'm aware a few posters have always been unconvinced by the role of the reps but I've always felt it was a very worthy initiative so long as our collective voice is heard and then considered by the their fellow non execuyive directors.
If pressure was put on our reps to vote against their better judgement then that should have been rejected by them . That very well could have resulted in a vote: 7 votes for with 2 against. Not a good result as far as I'm concerned but at least there'd be no issue with the accountability of our reps.
To make matters worse - if 'the board' then put pressure on our elected reps to gagg themselves then that is another serious misjudgment. The consequences for our reps integrity would be obvious especially to the more experienced board members. I really hope that never happened coz that's akin to hanging our two reps out to dry.
I have no idea what's happened. I do intend to send an email to both reps asking. If I was a rep and any of the above happened I'd honestly now explain myself to the very people who put their faith in me and stand true to the principles that made me campaign hard to get elected.
What exactly is it that he is fed up with? He seems like a decent guy, but when people were looking for answers regarding the Rangers situation, there seemed to be complete silence. If they'd been told to say nothing then I think they should have came out and said that. Both of them seem to be stuck in the middle and only being able to carry out their role when it suits the hibs board.
I would prefer if either of them had issues with the fans criticism, they would come out and say what those issues are. They're both fans as well as fans reps, and I think people would appreciate more openness.
Your wasting your time Brockie. Its amazing how many folk live their lives on the internet. As you say Frank is easy to contact either on email or at games. He is easily in the top 3 most recognisable match attending Hibs fans. Folk will contact him if they really want to......either that or moan on here but do nothing.
I know this isn't aimed at me, but I'll answer on behalf of myself anyway. :wink:
I thought about it and quite fancied it.
The truth is, I am a bit of an internet geek. I quite like debate on hibs.net, I quite like getting involved. It is a good platform with a lot of good debate, and I feel quite comfortable sticking my oar in, having an opinion, debating it, defending it and disagreeing with people from a position of anonymity. You can see a point that someone has made, pause for thought, gather your thoughts and post a reply as you see it. Some people may agree with your opinion, some people won't.
This is tougher face to face. Thinking on the spot and responding to problems, concerns and issues in person takes a certain skill set, possibly different to those required over the net. That's why I wouldn't give Frank a kicking for his lack of contribution on hibs.net - the squabbles we have over the internet may not suit his skill set, he may not want to get involved in an arena where he might not do himself justice. Face to face, on the day - I'm sure that is where he is at his best. He's a well-known face and has been trusted by many to represent us, so he must be doing something right for a large number of people.
The main reason I wouldn't stand - I think it is a thankless, impossible task. How on Earth are you meant to represent the Hibs support? We are a huge, diverse group, some reasoned and sensible, some utter bampots. It is literally impossible to do justice to the diversity and strength of opinion that exists amongst us. The "board position on EBTs" is such a topic. It is passionate, overly-emotional and very difficult. The fans reps are piggy in the middle, they'll have a lot more information than any of us to make a decision but have to represent our uninformed position to the board.
I have sympathy for the fans reps, but only to a point, as surely they would have known this when they stood for election. They will have known exactly what they were getting themselves into. It is a position that is a constant ball ache and brings constant aggro. Ok, now it is EBTs. But it could have been relegation, non-promotion, the team on the park being cack, the Scottish Cup final aftermath, a ballsed-up new stand build etc etc etc.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RgUIXA...ature=youtu.be
Not hard to find!
I have always viewed the Reps as complementary (which is why I voted for them), so the online was always going to be led by Tracey as far as I was concerned.
Been off work with a bit of gender specific sniffles so missed the development on Tuesday, suspect Frank was there and answering questions as normal.
I have given my views across a few threads and stated previously that the loss of the updates from Reps has been a real shame.
Hopefully the WT meeting next week will be an opportunity for them to restart
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any need for the antsy reply?
You knew fine well what I meant. He's doesn't post on here about anything. Results, tickets, Hearts stand, the EBT issue etc etc.
There are plenty of different subjects discussed on here every week and yet he's 'scared' to voice his own opinion in case of confrontation? Sounds like just the kinda guy we need fighting our corner right enough.
I don't really give a toss if Frank is good on social media or otherwise. In the dealings I've had with him, admittedly limited, he's been approachable and helpful. Likewise I've exchanged a few PMs with Tracey and she's been very helpful.
The communication is never going to be what some want, and I include myself, because the reps are bound by the same confidentiality as everyone else on the board. If there is sensitive information that has influenced their vote on this issue they can't now issue a statement revealing it.
It's a thankless task, and with no disrespect intended to those who have taken on the role, I said at the time of the last elections the whole thing should be scrapped and I stand by that now.