Shankland is miles better than Doidge. So, if you are a scout looking at this forum remember that.:greengrin
Printable View
Shankland is miles better than Doidge. So, if you are a scout looking at this forum remember that.:greengrin
Doidge wins this 1 but they were both impressive over the 2 games . Pity we hadnt taken a punt on Shankland though , him and Doidge would be some strike pairing . 50+ goals between them a season
Slight tangent to the debate, but Nisbet at Dunfermline has scored 22 goals this season after 34 last season at Raith Rovers. He will be on significantly less money than Shankland and plays currently for a less good team. Was he a better signing than Shankland or did Dunfermline, Dundee United and Hibs just all make good signings last summer in terms of their striking options?
Could they play together or far too similar???
He's a goalscorer but doesn't create them for himself or others. Neilson said it himself. Doidgy brings others into play,is superb in the air for a guy who is shorter than Newell and Hanlon and keeps making good runs all the time. I'm sure others will see it different but slightly doidgy for me although wouldn't mind shankland in the team of course.
Simple Doidge. He plays for us and is contributing all round the pitch and scored 14 at the top level in Scotland.
Could be that most opponents he has faced just can’t do it. The quality of defending in scottish football is not that high.
I don’t think Shankland just plays off the shoulder but an obvious tactic for Dundee Utd is to get a winger or other pacy player alongside him who could exploit a high line effectively.
Anyhow, congrats overall to our much maligned defence who restricted Shankland to a few chances over the two games... unfortunately he took two of them very well.
I agree with you re pace on the wings has been a big asset for Utd and Shankland this season. My reply was more to the notion that underscore had spotted a simple way of stopping Shankland that the rest of Scotland has apparently failed to see so far.
However much he was allegedly offside, and however high/well our defence played - Shankland still got 2 in 2 against us. You'd take that from your striker if he's been kept out of the game for most of it.
IMO you can play high, deep, inside-out or upside down and Shankland will cause problems. He's a far cleverer player than most of us give him credit for. And he certainly doesn't rely on his own pace.
Again though - it was the Artful Doidger who came away with the hat-trick and victory, which is all that really matters.
I don't know what to make of Shankland after the two games. Impressed that he scored twice or critical as he was otherwise completely anonymous. Or should I be impressed with that too? Difficult one.