Gauld got capped after playing well in the MLS.
Printable View
https://www.feanonline.nl/sc-heerenv...t-dylan-vente/
'SC Heerenveen denies agreement with transfer target Dylan Vente'
Clearly he has a value in the Dutch league.
That doesn’t mean we think he’d come back here and do what he did over there. Chuck in the fact he only has a year left on his deal and has openly spoken about Scottish football maybe not suiting him, it’s no wonder we’d want to sell him if we can.
As a club and business I am all for signing these Melkersens and Ventes. Ideally yes we want them to do well in the first team, but hey if these types of players are coming out of leagues who spend more than we do then we should be exploiting that.
According to the sun Sevco close to two deals Kwame Poku who was at Peterborough and Max Aaron’s from Bournemouth on loan .
Getting anything over the amount that we paid for Vente would be great, would imagine we give it till the end of the week to get a decision on Rocky and Hoilett, i wouldn't be waiting forever if i was Hibs.
Ryan Hardie signed for Wrexham
Easy with the exclamation marks
I read what you said as being a seeded team in the group stages, I see now you meant being seeded in the next round. We did get out of the groups as a seeded team in the group stages, but weren’t seeded in the next round. Both are valid interpretations of what you said.
Seen a little bit of Poku live, tidy player, had a decent season but if he'd rocked up at Easter Road in the latter half of last season I can't see where he would have got a game.
My Posh supporting neighbour said Poku was going to Birmingham City for big wages. Maybe he always wanted to be a hun?
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
Ryan Hardie joins Wrexham, been linked with us a few times.
Does anyone really care what Sevco (2) Scotland Ltd really do?
My expectation of how things were going to go with the Black Knights and Bournemouth link up has been absolutely been miles off the mark, sadly.
Thought it was going to be a real game changer.
They’ve already put £6m in.
Our current Head of Recruitment came from Bournemouth. Just in the last week there has been mention of them having done an audit on the medical side of the club (an area which appeared to be failing). Part of our pre season is being spent down at Bournemouth.
There is clearly an increasing amount of activity and input on the go and we’re getting access to people who operate at a higher level than ours who can help make the club better.
I think it looks pretty positive at the moment.
:agree:
I think the early signings of Bevan, Marcondes and NMW probably made people (including me) expect to see a lot more transfer activity between the two clubs,
What we’re getting appears to be working well but I don’t think it’s unfair to say it’s not how most people envisaged it going. As long as we’re doing well though then it doesn’t really matter.
What does it matter what market players are coming from as long as the players improve us, which they very much have. It’s about recruiting smarter. Clubs who have historically just thrown money at recruitment to buy success have been caught up (and in some cases overtaken) by clubs who are cleverer in the transfer market.
I agree with you .. I think that Malky and SDG deserve the credit, also the board and Ian Gordon appointing them despite the black knights. Foley made it clear there appointments were not what he wanted. Whilst I am sure the relationship has improved and the black knights are helping us in the background it is still a bit of a damp squib compared to what I was hoping for. I honestly expected them to have more of a strategy / coherent plan but ot does not seem like that so far.. maybe just being a bit impatient but if I was in their shoes I would have made an early statement of intent.
It doesn't matter did I ever say it did? I'm just stating what I think he meant. I do think if a team really wants to become the 3rd force in Scotland though they need to go up a level in the market they shop in. History proves it's extremely difficult to maintain 3rd place over a couple of seasons and we are currently in the best position to do this.
Celtic are in talks to sign Albirex Niigata centre-back Hayato Inamura.
@SkySportsNews understands discussions have progressed well today and the 23-year-old is keen to join the Scottish champions.
Inamura is a left-footed centre-back, who can also play at left-back.
2 clubs in for Vente
https://x.com/mhendry92/status/19347...S2WtDOFfqS0zFA
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looked tidy alright but don’t think he’s the type of signing as well as Lyle Cameron they are going to put a challenge in on the other lot with .. notice the last while rumours like European clubs chasing Igamane where they are looking well over £10m for and seen this one now , probably their best player but £25m ? Seem to be really hoping to sell a couple for big bucks …
https://x.com/BelgianFans/status/1934585427479937211
And now it looks like Bournemouth are sending a quality player (Max Aarons) on loan to rangers. Bit weird no? Have they not said they want us to challenge the top 2?
:agree: BKFC are delighted with Gray and the relationship, they played an integral part of the hiring of the new CEO and progress a is being made at pace at the club with BKFC and Ian Gordon heavily involved.
The club is in great shape at the moment as odd only going to get stronger- the recent board changes are reflective of more hands on input from BKFC who are very much working as one with Hibs rather than a split.
Last season's "success" was absolutely not done in spite of BKFC, but very much in tandem with them. It's been a huge collective effort and I think there's every reason to be very optimistic about what's coming down the line for us.
I don't think we're should be seeing Bournemouth players go to Rangers, however, I would hope if that happens there's some context to it that explains the decision as it doesn't look great if a player is moving from there to Scotland and it's not us they're coming to.
We were never going to get guys of Max Aarons standard on loan
He was at Valencia last season
Doesn’t change anything imo and can’t be held against the BK
I wasn't so much suggesting that Hibs get him, just that they find a club for him that isn't a direct rival of the club they part own?
On paper there's probably never been a better chance for Hibs to split the OF (a stated target of BK at Hibs) in the last 25 years and now they are helping Rangers with their rebuild?
Just seems odd to me.
Kyle Walker agrees to one year deal to Everton.
The guy will be on a Premier League wage miles out of our reach even if we are both part of the same group. I don’t think it’s realistic that we could expect Bournemouth never to trade with anyone up here, just as we’d still trade to other teams down there (if we have a player good enough). Man City for example, I’d expect to still loan or sell players to other teams in Spain even though Girona are part of the City Football Group. The Red Bull teams will loan or sell players to teams competing against other teams for the group and so on.
If Brentford offered us £10m for Bowie next summer should we reject it on the basis that it could strengthen a team in the same division as Bournemouth? Of course we wouldn’t.
Both Hibs and Bournemouth will do whatever is in their respective best interests. If there are opportunities where our interests align and are mutually beneficial we will take them.
Honestly Hibs or any other team aren’t splitting the OF . I must have missed something about what was said by the BK’s as I thought it was to have us finishing 3rd and qualifying for Europe regularly which is more realistic but still challenging all the same . The partnership with Bournemouth doesn’t mean they stop doing what’s best for them in loaning players to other clubs in our league . Doing what’s best for Bournemouth is what the multi group is all about though hopefully there’s benefits for us to which I think we are seeing now.
It's not that long ago Hibs loaned a striker to Rangers.
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
Alright. So what if they are covered in that position? Do you expect them to pay the 10m just to prevent a rival getting him? So if they don't buy a player they don't need it is on them? Or are they then just okay with us strengthening a rival?
What benefit does being in a group actually give them? They suddenly can't send players on loan, or even sell, to large portions of the Scottish, French, Australian, and Portuguese top divisions? For fearvof strengthening any of their grouo's rivals? Some benefit!
Hibs aren't run for Bournemouth's benefit. And I wouldn't want them to be. And that works both ways
How much was that down to the Black Knights directly though? Of course we'll take finishing 3rd every year in any way shape or form, but the Black Knights weren't responsible for us signing folk like Nicky Cadden etc. What I'm trying to get at is that I'm disappointed that we haven't seen the 'higher quality' type players ie Marcondes and Malodia. Those two you could tell had real real class and gave a taste of what I thought was to come, but since then we've not had a single player in to match.
Granted the window has just opened and there's still alot of time, but players of that calibre are what got/get the fans off their seats and make a huge difference on the park.
I’m sure I read that SDG and his team had visited Bournemouth and spoke with their coaching team. What about Stewart in the recruitment role. He came from the group?
I think you have to remember it’s just as important to learn off the park as it is on the park. Maybe SDG has tried something different after a visiting to Bournemouth.
Whilst I understand what you are saying about Maolida and Marcondes but Nicky Cadden got me off my seat plenty of times.
As it stands we are moving in the right direction alongside BKG. We don’t need to shout it from the rooftops like our inferiority complex neighbours but go about our business with BKG quietly and efficiently.