Astonishing but not surprising that a vote as important as this is subject to an 8-4 arrangement and not the OF's precious 11-1 vote:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin80
Printable View
Astonishing but not surprising that a vote as important as this is subject to an 8-4 arrangement and not the OF's precious 11-1 vote:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin80
Quote:
Originally Posted by stokesmessiah
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/footbal...6908-23879930/
Chairman Brian Lee said: “If Rangers sent an application letter to the Conference they’d get a letter back saying we couldn’t accept them because we’re signed up to The Football Association structure.
English Football League chairman Greg Clarke said recently: “We have absolutely no intention of having any discussions with any club from another national league regarding them attaining membership of our competition.
“Richard Scudamore is on record as saying it’s a league for English and Welsh clubs.
That'll be a "NO" then.
Came up with this little ditty on my way home from work:
If you go down to the woods today you're sure of a big surprise,
The Teddy Bears of Govan are trying to dry their eyes,
Because Murray, Greene and Craigie Whyte,
Left Glasgow Rangers in the s***e,
Today's the day that Rangers are liquidaaaated
Take it away Wullie.....
http://youtu.be/1pDk75Y1SZ4 ...:faf::faf::faf:
But the vote will just be a yes or no, it won't be multiple choice, based on sanctions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy74
Couldn't be a noose. Huns can't read.Quote:
Originally Posted by frazeHFC
I'd switch Ross County to the for Rangers groups, given their current Director of Footballs Rangers roots, EBT payments and all. Motherwell I could see being in the No group though, supposedly they've sold a lot more season tickets for this season with the prospect of Champions League football, while I guess newco Rangers wouldn't stop them getting more of that, they will likely have less of an income drop than was originally supposed if they aren't there...Quote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottB
I'm not sure Motherwell do have the most to lose financially. They are the most likely to benefit from the extra prize money that finishing 2nd earns you as things stand. Not to mention the Champions League Qualifier that they'll play in. They could some decent TV money if they draw a big name.
What if green and newco buy St Mirren, rename them and relocate them much in the same way Airdrie Utd did to Clydebank?
Because Airdrie did it, there is precedent.Quote:
Originally Posted by HibeeDave
I'd think it more likely they buy an SFL club, like Cowdenbeath though.
Not convinced hearts would vote yes, Romanov is no great lover of Rangers and they've been shafted over the lee wallace transfer.
for those of you not in Scotland, there's a sportsound special starting at 18:10
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/scotland/17325775
1801:
Charles Green has told Rangers TV: "It's massively disappointing and I think to some extent we have been misled by HMRC.
"Duff and Phelps have consistently said to me that they were in dialogue with HMRC and that they hadn't rejected the CVA route.
"Irrespective of what I was being told by HMRC, my own advisors at Deloitte have been in dialogue with them too.
"To see them today saying this is a 'policy decision' leaves me speechless. If that's the case, is that a policy that was invented this week?
"If not, why weren't we told that in February or March? We could have gone into a NewCo then and saved a huge amount of money and time.
"It would also have removed the false hope from Rangerst fans. There is no possible way that this is better for creditors."
Odd how Green didn't know that it was policy for HMRC to not accept CVA's for football teams in instances like Ranger's, yet 90% of folk on here knew.....:confused:
he must surely be yet another corrupt trumpet....
Agree, they still owe Romanov something in the region of £800K. Might sway their decision. The hertz fans i know are opposed to voting yesQuote:
Originally Posted by Del Boy
The SPL Clubs.....Hibs included now have to make a decision over the Ibroxgate issue and decide if we take the financial hammering or let them back in. personally its a Judas situation.......I would take the hit and show we are not letting a club like that get away with conning people for years and punt them to Div 3. The Tash will vote against them....the Yams are scared stiff and will side with The Glasgow Thieves.
what do you think the SPL clubs should do??????
Its a no brainer, could be the end for Scottish football as we know it if they are let back in with minor sanctions.
Make a stand and just say NO.Quote:
Originally Posted by sauzee1966
We don't need them, we don't want them and they should be made to pay heavily for cheating their way to trophies over goodness knows how many years.
Rangers don't do walking away. Aye let's put them to the test.
SAY NO.
VR is trying to punt them. They're more financially attractive with Rangers in the league so it will be a definite yes, irrespective of the LW cash.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hovehibby
Can someone answer this?
What's to stop the SFL from simply increasing division 1 to 12 teams, adding Rangers and one other then letting Spartans into SFL3?
If they're made to join the SFL this will happen!
A point I've forgotten. If the BDO investigation gets deep into the financial more do they have the authority to delve into MIH if there appears to be anything dodgy?
Do they have the right to look at personal or working relationships of secretaries? Thinking investigations into Hearts.
There must be a lot more strands here that could be followed up on.
depends if clubs value their own fans moreQuote:
Originally Posted by HUTCHYHIBBY
Because they would be a club short.Quote:
Originally Posted by VickMackie
If Rangers are out of the SPL, then Dundee will be promoted.
Either way it would be a matter for the SFL. I would guess that putting Rangers in SFL3 woiuld keep them in the SFL for three years as opposed to one if they are admitted to SFL1.
Just seen him.... What an absolute tool
Those on RM are confident the assets will be sold whilst they're still in admin and therefore won't be available to the liquidators to flog.
This seems to answer my previous points on how they can sell them. I was under the impression they'd be liquidated as soon as the Cva was rejected.
The ***** will wriggle out and be in the SPL next year.
Would depend on the SKY deal but other than that, not a lot. I reckon, if anything we could be better off.Quote:
Originally Posted by rosscarnie
So long as we vote NO I will be at ER next season. If Rangers are voted back in by the others I just wont be going to any other stadiums to watch us (well maybe the cup final :greengrin).Quote:
Originally Posted by PatHead
How the duck can they get a vote on this? No way should Rangers be allowed to vote. I know people have tried to explain by how on earth can Green be allowed to buy Ibrox, Murry Park etc...... for £5.5 million :confused:. Surely it should all be sold off to the highest bidder for the money to be split between the creditors. Listening to sportsound it sounds to me as if a newco will just form and everything will just continue to be the same.
Should we have a poll to make clear hibs nets thoughts on accepting new huns back into the spl? Otherwise we will get that so called supporters spokesman making statements on behalf of hibs supporters which very few hibs supporters actually agree with.
Hibs say no!!!!!
It is no sad thing that a force of evil is in the process of dying let us hope it's ********* off spring is not a chip of the old block. Regardless of this, Dunfermline or Dundee must replace them. The son of evil must start at the begining and that is the Third division. If Hibs vote to allow them it is a betrayal for what our Great club stands has always stood for - fair play and honesty.
They only need to add 3 teams, Including the newco to make sure there was enough teams for the whole Scottish football structure to be intact. Quite easily achieved with shuffling up the way.Quote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
It may be in the SFL clubs interest to have them go through 3 divisions but if they agreed to share revenues equally from their div 1 campaign I'm sure they'd agree.