They are in my heid and they'll be non existent by the time I get home and set about the Corona and Jack Daniels! :aok:
Printable View
Be warned...you did ask...:greengrin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0
This thread gets me more excited than any porn site out there :devil:
:jmcp:
Back on a more serious note :wink:
It seems according to the press this morning that Houston will be taking over for the LCF.
Quick question, where the hell do they get the money and the balls to announce this?, why are the SPL bigwigs not asking questions here, they ain't got a pot to piss in and up to their ear holes in debt but they can afford a new managers wages?
:wtf:
Enlighten me please...
Houston looks a wee bit like a bus driver too to be fair
what about going into admin would be good, will they not just get there debt wiped out like the rangers and keep all there "assets" i say that loosely. just seems like a quick way to save 40 million quid or whatever there up to now?
Not quite the same. A Lithuanian admin would be working for the Lituanian State who has just seen about £ 70 million of their hard earned pee'd up a wall by Vlad on one of his foreign toys.
I don't think it would be good Lithuanian politics to be giving a Russian crook ( alledgedly ) an easy time.
I don't really know how it would play out over here with a local admin. working on instruction of the Lith.Admin. but I would have thought they would be better off getting themselves into admin. before the foreign lot do it for them.
but how would any of this affect the yams? what difference will it actually make?
rangers are in a far better position now, when they eventually get back they'll spend a shed load and win everything again taking ours and everybody elses players in the process.
I find it incredible that they find managers like Fester who just walk away without a whimper about no compensation on their contract and now Houston leaves a fairly good run club because of financial constraints to put his hat in for the worst run SPL club in the history of Scottish
Football (bar the huns yes)...is there something in the water up there?
There are a lot of differences.
Taking the Rangers situation first, they are not out of the woods yet. The liquidators have still to investigate the transfer of the assets to Sevco at what appears to be an undervalue.
However, the main difference between the two is that Hearts' main asset(Tynecastle) is pledged as security to one of its creditors, which in itself is under threat of administration. There was no such security in the RFC case, which made it easier to transfer Ibrox.
The whole security/UBIG situation is the key here, and we aren't any closer to establishing how that will play out. My best guess at the moment is that the best Hearts can hope for is to preserve the club (however you define that), but be homeless.
That's the problem with this thread, it's all guesswork and speculation(entertaining though that is!). No one really knows what the next move is, or what effect the closing of UB has on the day to day running of UBIG. Personally I'm looking forward to the next domino to fall and the next level of entertainment to keep me amused on those dull work days . . :greengrin
in this case i am very much pro admin :greengrin
There's merit in that. There is a perception that a "friendly" administrator is better than one who is imposed. That didn't work out with Craig Whyte, of course.
I reckon that, if Hearts make it to the Top 6, you might see them going into administration voluntarily, ie appointing someone themselves. That way, the 18 point penalty is irrelevant. (although other clubs would, rightly IMO, have a say about that).
If they don't make the Top 6, they may still circle the wagons. After all, that is probably their duty, given their apparent insolvency.