No, it didn't make it any more automatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Printable View
No, it didn't make it any more automatic.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Yep.. that is a superb sound-bite. :agree:Quote:
Originally Posted by easty
ThanksQuote:
Originally Posted by green glory
From SPL press release:Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy74
http://www.scotprem.com/content/defa...2&newsid=11407Quote:
It was agreed that, in future, any decision on the transfer of a share to a newco from any club will be considered by all member clubs, rather than the SPL Board, with flexibility to impose sanctions appropriate to each individual circumstance. The resolutions proposing fixed penalties on a newco were therefore withdrawn as being obsolete.
You must concede that an 8-4 vote will be harder for the New Huns to get than a simple majority of the SPL board?Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy74
So that's 5 no votes needed ....Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Celtc and Sheep - because their fans would demand it even if they wanted RFC in the league
Hibs - Petrie's integrity speech (+ fans ...)
I would hope Motherwell and Dundee U would see it as a chance to do better in the league.
Others ?
Thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Know its 8-4 required but why should oldco get a vote in this at all? Surely they should step aside.
What Doncaster wanted was for the green light to be given to allowing newco's to rejoin the spl in place of the club that is liquidated with a fixed set of penalties, in this case a 10 point deduction and financial restrictions for two years. This would mean that it was pre-approved for the Huns to get back into the spl straight away without a vote. By rejecting those two proposals the rest of the spl have knocked that on the head and it means that any attempt to get a newco into the spl will be dealt with case by case and it's approval and any sanctions imposed with re-entry will be decided by a majority vote of the spl member clubs and not the spl board.
As it stands if rangers are liquidated they need the majority of the clubs in the spl to agree to allow them back in, not the sfa, not the spl board, and certainly not Doncaster, and if they don't get the majority vote then it's applying to the sfl and division 3.
Good summary, also how I interpret the events today. Could scupper Greene's masterplan.Quote:
Originally Posted by MyJo
An oldie but goodie
Die die die die ya Huns
Die die die die ya Huns
Die die die die, die die die die ya Huns
Die die die die ya Huns
Die die die die ya Huns
Die die die die, die die die die ya Huns.
Repeat.
Greene's offer is conditional on an SPL place. That much is explicit in the CVA document, even if little else is.Quote:
Originally Posted by johnbc70
If there is a delay or uncertainty in that SPL place being granted, then it is little wonder that there is now the reported delay in the sale process.
It all depends on the decision on the CVA.Quote:
Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod
Is there any indication as to when this will happen?
The creditors will vote to accept/reject the CVA on 14th June.Quote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
It may not even get to that. This is one of the conditions of Green's offer:-Quote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
4.22.6 all consents or other requirements of the SPL and SFA having been obtained or complied with so that Rangers Football Club can continue to participate in such domestic leagues and competitions as it currently participates in.
Who will pay the wages in the meantime?Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney McGrew
That will be half a months' wages at full whack.
The creditors' pot will be negative at this rate!
Sorry if already posted
Besiktas suspended from European competition for one year by Uefa
Uefa have suspended Besiktas from all European competition for one year, and fined them €200,000, due to financial problems at the Istanbul club, according to Turkish media.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...-by-Uefa.html#
The move comes after Uefa scrutinised Besiktas' accounts in the second and third quarters of 2011 and ruled that they breached articles of the ruling body's financial fair play regulations.
Shares in Besiktas tumbled more than 9 per cent following the news.
Besiktas chairman, Fikret Orman, and the club's lawyers attended a meeting with Uefa's disciplinary committee for a second time on Wednesday after the club was earlier warned about its financial status and high debt.
Orman said Besiktas would appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) regarding the ban, but added he was not very optimistic about a ruling in favour of the 13-time Turkish champions.
"We will defend the club's rights until the end, and will appeal to CAS as the first step," Levent Erdogan, a lawyer and club board member told Turkey's Dogan news agency.
"I think it's a dramatic decision, and it will hit us pretty badly, but there's nothing we can do."
Looking forward to news coming from this afternoon's SPL meeting regarding the dual contracts. Exciting!
Graham Fraser@STVGrahamFor those interested in SPL board meeting into alleged use of dual contracts at Rangers - no announcement expected today. Possibly tomorrow.
This gets more farcical by the hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by H18SVG
So everything has to wait for six weeks before HMRC bomb out the CVA and it is too late to expel them.
meanwhile the debt will be mounting and D&P will continue to bleed the CVA pot dry with their fees.
FIFA and UEFA will have to act soon.
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamontQuote:
Originally Posted by green glory
No SPL update on dual contracts investigation/allegations today after all
The SFA can expel them at any time. In that event, the CVA process falls.Quote:
Originally Posted by jgl07
When is the SFA response and the FIFA thing likely to happen, is it feasible that green could buy them then the SFA/FIFA finish them off after that? Kinda like the idea of them thinking its sorted then having the rug pulled out
I take it this literally means CL and EL competitions and not domestic Turkish league and cup competitions, which is where Rangers are at presently.Quote:
Originally Posted by joe breezy
This journalist writing for "Accountancy Age" posted a headline saying that D&P were going to get paid £17.9m as administrators. I wrote to ask her where she got the figures from, but I've had no reply. If true, this would have been a major news story. But looking at the CVA Proposal from D&P, I think I can see her mistake. Schedule 4 to the Proposal sets out D&P's estimated outturn for RFCIA under three possible (different) scenarios - CVA, NewCo and Liquidation. Ms Accountancy Age journalist has added the three numbers for D&P's fees under each of the outcomes together! Oops.Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
I reckon Green won't complete the sale until he is certain that the SPL and SFA places are assured.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mon Dieu4
Alasdair Lamont @BBCAlLamontQuote:
Originally Posted by Mon Dieu4
No contact between FIFA and SFA re rangers going to Court of Session since yesterday's verdict
She has a future in the accountancy game, possibly a future financial controller of a Newco Rangers, or even a senior administrator at Duff and Phelps.Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
Now that's what you call creative accounting.Quote:
Originally Posted by grunt
Fixed. :greengrinQuote:
Originally Posted by Caversham Green