:agree: SFA does SFA so to speak.Quote:
Originally Posted by neilmartinrocks
Printable View
:agree: SFA does SFA so to speak.Quote:
Originally Posted by neilmartinrocks
People shouldnt boycott Hibs over this, to be fair the Tasche has stood up for fans and is generally hostile to OF.
Celtic have by far the most to lose if Rangers go down to 3rd division, therefore the chances of them boycotting SPL or voting to punish Rangers are none existant. Other SPL clubs should all resign and leave OF to themselves (they deserve each other) like what nearly happened over that whole Sentanta deal a few years ago.
Oh dear, the fat lady is about to step up to the podium and start singing about Scottish football.
one minute they want out and the next we cant do without them.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
the twisted sisters ARE whats wrong with scottish football.
they want all the money all the glory and all the decisions to go their way.
get them tae **** away to their atlantic league or the premiership or anywhere just get rid before they **** it up for everybody.
Such a parcel of rogues in a nation!
It's not a matter of boycotting Hibs. There's no point in even pretending there's a level playing field anymore, so what's the point?Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
Scottish football is goosed, but worse than that, it's openly corrupt.
Who is going to buy a team in a corrupt league run by a corrupt SFA/SPL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibbyradge
absolutely disgusting, i already regretted buying 3 season tickets after the final now....well i dunno what to say to that:violin:Quote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
Aye, drop the "p" and it still reads true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hiberlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Twiglet
No idea, i just heard there was a vote among the other clubs to give their verdict that would decide it.
People should boycott Hibs matches in the SPL. It doesn't matter if this seems to punish the club - by competing in this competition, they are endorsing an utterly corrupt institution (by which I mean the SPL). I would honestly rather hibs moved themselves into the SFL, and considered 1st place in the first division to be the highest legitimate prize on offer, other than the two cups. The SPL is no longer a competition, it is an embarrassment, a travesty, and a farce, with which a team like Hibs should have no association whatsoever.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
This is bigger than one club. Rangers getting a free pass into the SPL renders the whole league pointless.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
Looks like it's to late for that.Quote:
Originally Posted by neilmartinrocks
They have *****d it up for everybody.
If they fell in they would come out smelling of bluebells.
Scottish Football.
28/05/2012
RIP.
Disgusting from the bigot fans http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/inde...owtopic=221389
Jokerfest!
SPL bending over backwards to help Rangers but not Livi or Gretna when it should have been the other way round.
maybe thats the plan thenQuote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
kill scottish football and then eufa/fifa might let them play in england.
nah thats just paranoia ........or is it?
Property developers, mate.Quote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
The question that needs asking, is this an SFA/SPL decision or were the other 11 clubs involved in this too. :agree:Quote:
Originally Posted by frazeHFC
The media seem happy to print stories to placate the Huns, however Doncaster and the like do the same...
Surely the HMRC won't accept a 3p in the Pound deal, especially when Green says he has at least another £10 million 'war chest'?
And surely the newco that is formed can't simply be allowed in the SPL?
Whilst I've enjoyed the saga I still get an uneasy feeling when I read these 'stories to keep the huns happy'
I'd prefer the nuclear thing to come out sooner rather than later but I suppose someone has good reason to keep the powder dry for the moment
Celtic would alienate their own fans in any move to back up the hunsQuote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
Letter from Celtic Trust to the SFA
http://www.celtictrust.net/?func=d_home_article&id=373
Just take a look at kerrydale street or the fan blogs such as rangers tax case to see what Celtic fans think of it
I can't see Celtic voting for Rangers, they'd lose 50 000 fans
http://i1175.photobucket.com/albums/..._tombstone.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
Quite right too.Quote:
Originally Posted by AgentDaleCooper
I wonder how often statements like this are going to need to be posted until people realise there are bigger things at stake here than simply boycotting Hibs, its the integrity of the SPL that is at stake here.
I feel a bit like Doncaster and the rest of the blazers involved here are trying to 'call our bluff' on this especially after the thoughts of fans of the 12 clubs where delivered through that survey.
What they obviously dont understand is that the cost to standard ratio in the SPL is enough for people to stay away never mind adding in this @rse licking corrupt and dare I say criminal behaviour.
Doncaster is putting the sky tv deal before anything or anyone else in this, the terms 'there must be 4 old firm games per season' included in this deal is corrupt in itself you shouldn't be able to guarentee that will be the case especially when your signing a deal over multiple years
Rangers have not only broken fair play rules they've broken the law cheated the country out of huge amounts of money no punishments or sanctions not only show the SPL/SFA up as corrupt it sends a terrible message to young supporters of our game.
As sad as it is I won't be seen to support this if it's true I won't be attending SPL or SFA games and I won't be watching SPL games or highlights on tv.
Totally agree, and I'm sitting here shaking my head in disbelief reading that Telegraph article.Quote:
Originally Posted by Matty_Jack04
If it turns out to be true, I really don't know what I'll do next season. I've spent my £405 but for what?
A Gold licence that lets us compete for third place at best. Whilst having no licence allows you to compete for the title. Apparently.Quote:
Originally Posted by DaveF
If it is true then I'm with you Silver. I sincerely hope this does not turn out to be the case but the ST money I have been sitting on will go towards something completely unrelated to football. It looks as if our only hope of salvation is that FIFA step in and introduce some sanity to this whole mess.Quote:
Originally Posted by silverhibee
Scottish Football RIP
Is the Telegraph the only "newspaper" running this exclusive - can't see this actually mentioned on any other online newspapers? How reliable is their source - assuming they have a source that is - is this "news" on the radio in Scotland/UK? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by CentreLine
Sadly it is not Hibs that are the problem, it is Scottish football as a whole that just happens to include our club. If the rules are not applied to all clubs evenly and the whole system is biased towards one or two clubs then the whole thing becomes pointless. I guess we have all been kidding ourselves on for years but this time the football authorities are spelling it out so that even the most blinkered can see, Scottish football is corrupt to the core in favour of the OF. Hibs, along with all of the other non OF clubs, are victims here but their continued involvement in the SPL is to submit to the acknowledged corruption. I cannot watch that happen from the stands at ER or any other ground in Scotland. My only hope now is that UEFA/FIFA step in or that at least Hibs have the balls to resign from the SPL. If not then I have any number of things I can do with £400+ and with the greatest of regret I walk away from Scottish football. Right now I feel worse than I did 19th May, totally guttedQuote:
Originally Posted by andrew_dundee
I think we're getting out knickers in a twist here. The point of the article as I see it, is that it's talking about 'as things stand'. It also points out the loophole which would allow them to compete in the SPL is something which they are looking to close.
I think it's academic. The Huns are dying anyway, it's just that no-one wants to be left with blood on their hands.
There's no harm in getting outraged though as it helps keep the pressure on the powers that be in the SFA and the SPL.
Between the side contracts, the current debt, the still to be announced FTTT result, the silly attempt by the admins to overturn the transfer embargo etc etc etc, I think it's fair to assume the quintessential British cheats are goosed.
For those getting in a lather about this, it isn't about a vote or straight out corruption, it's about badly written rules. The SFA have been granting licences since 2005 and the SPL have advised clubs that they must have a licence to compete in their league. What they have apparently failed to do is incorporate that requirement into their written laws and without that the requirements cannot be enforced. Astonishing incompetence - yes, favouring Rangers - no, since they could not have foreseen these circumstance seven years ago. I do wonder how any other club in a similar position would fare though (Hearts appear to have submitted their accounts late but still got a licence...).Quote:
Originally Posted by frazeHFC
On the other hand, those same laws contain absolutely no provision for the introduction of a Newco, indeed some of the laws could be read as specifically prohibiting it, but by the same token as the licence loophole, if it ain't in the rules it can't happen IMO. This is being glossed over by Doncaster and others though, I would like to see them address the point directly, but no doubt they would be able to bend the rules somehow in this case. That's why I am against the new rules to be voted on this week - by recognising a newco thay are introducing the exception that proves the rule in the true sense of that phrase.