Just pointing out who was in control in the boardroom that's all.
Printable View
...which is, in essence, what I said in that post. I may have mentioned legal action earlier; CBA trawling through old posts. However, I'm sure that, if HOH/Hibileaks didn't stop with the lies and unfounded allegations, legal action would have been the next step.
Next question:- did they say that the strategy would be presented as a fait accompli, or one that was open to consultation?
Maybe the delay is down to the banks? It's the future of Hibs that's being planned. There's no rush, and I for one would rather they took an extra month (or more) and get it right. Who knows, they may even come up with a solid, viable proposition - something neither of the pressure groups have managed?
"...........a solid, viable proposition - something neither of the pressure groups have managed ? " [
That is IT in a nutshell - we have listened to the "spin" now come up with sustainable policies .
That phrase sounds familiar - ah yes at " Referendum" time :greengrin
I donated to the foodbank but have no support for HOH when it comes to their 'aims' (whatever they are) or their stories about Hibs. I'm sure hundreds of other, if not thousands, are in the same boat.
I really don't think you can use the success of the foodbank collection as a way of measuring support for HOH as a whole.
The foodbank would not have been remotely the success it was without this site the bounce and indeed the club. If it was to be used as a sign of support for Hibileaks or buyhibs people would have starved.
Hands on Hibs and (to a lesser extent)BuyHibs are amateur night at Pontins,laced with personal spite against STF.In my view he has shown great restraint in face of slanderous attacks,but if I were him I would simply withdraw my guarantees and let these people get on with it(which would mean the end of Hibs).No one denies that the last few years have been a shambles and RP has been a disaster over that period,but to accuse STF of dishonesty and "milking" Hibs for his own financial gain,when he is able to(and does) give millions of pounds to charity goes beyond all bounds of commonsense and decency.
For the first time for a few years,there is appearing a glimmer of progress and STF recognises the need to change for the future. It seems to me to be sensible to await the AGM,as I'm sure that the promised proposals will be preferable to the half baked vindictive fodder we've been treated to so far.