I guess this why none of our BBC reporters address the Sectarianism up here… 🤷
Printable View
I guess this why none of our BBC reporters address the Sectarianism up here… 🤷
They also hired Andrew Neil who never shied away from giving his opinion and that was never an issue for folkQuote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
If Lineker's views were more right wing, The Sun and Daily Mail wouldn't have been running front pages slagging him off either
Don't actually mind Gary Lineker, at least he has some sort of clue what he's talking about unlike the utter trumpets we get up here (Mikey Stewart anyone?).
Always loved that during Euro 2016 when Lennon was a pundit and halfway through the competition appointed Hibs Manager that Lineker asked him about it and how he was looking forward to managing Hibs live on air.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElginHibbie
100% correct.
The Murdoch media, the Daily Hate and the Torygraph have an agenda against the BBC, they absolutely detest it.
Amplifying outrage against a presenter for having opinions is just a convenient line of attack. If Lineker liked that prick Farage they'd praise him but find a way to attack 'lefty' BBC bosses for curtailing his freedom of speech.
The biggest fans of freedom of speech ever, who love freedom of speech, honest, get another person sacked for saying something they don't like. Funny, that.
I'm not sure that was the case with Neil at the BBC. The only really significant time I recall him going 'off script' was after the Bataclan terrorist massacre, for which he got a lot of plaudits.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElginHibbie
Otherwise he was a ferocious interviewer for sure, but equally capable of putting the boot into politicians from the left or right. And that's the bigger point, he was a political journalist not a sports presenter.
The paltry coverage of that Rangers banner at the last old firm game was pathetic.Quote:
Originally Posted by EdinMike
Daily Mail types will be delighted. Funny how the same rules never applied to Clarkson? Huw Edwards had his pay increased after getting arrested. :rolleyes:
I like Lineker and would largely align with his opinions.
The thing is though - he ruffled feathers, he was controversial and definitely had folk gunning for him. Under such circumstances the tiniest of errors of judgment was always going to be seized upon.
The BBC prefer people to keep quiet and stick to safe subjects. Ultimately they couldn’t wait to get rid of him and I don’t think he can really have many complaints.
I think it's a bit different when public money pays your wages. The man himself admitted he shouldn't have shared it and shown himself up.
I for one am delighted that this woke loudmouth, who had a right cheek to criticise mass genocide and the execution of 10s of thousands of illegal innocent defenseless kids and healthcare workers, is finally off our airwaves.
Quote:
Originally Posted by He's here!
Tough interviewer or not, he was a senior political journalist who made no secret of his own political affiliations.
The BBC is now run by a bunch of Tories and the double standards are shocking.
Seems to me Jeremy Clarkson could be the best man for the gig, popular establishment figure, popular with a fair slice of the demographic and unlikely to be called out for his non "woke" views.
I'm off to the Holy Ground........
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
It's a shame Lineker wasn't a convicted sex offender.
The BBC have always been nothing but kind to them.
Huw Edwards, Saville & most recently an appearance on the Romanov story podcast/docuseries for Graham Rix.
That company should have been put to the sword a long time ago.
As someone with Jewish heritage in the family, I felt that he crossed a line last week. Anti-Semitism is the oldest form of racism, all too often swept under a cloak of being 'anti-Israel'. He betrayed a (sadly common) lack of historical awareness.Quote:
Originally Posted by Since452
However, as I've mentioned on another thread my bugbear with him was that while he seemed fine with pontificating on the more 'centrist dad' issues of the day like Brexit, he refused to engage when questioned about his silence on biological men undermining women's sport, an issue you'd think as a high-profile sports presenter he might have a opinion worth hearing. Yet when challenged about it on a Q&A on The Rest is Football podcast by Martina Navratilova and others he just said it was 'too nuanced'.
Tweet about the Arab-Israeli conflict, one of the world's longest running and most divisive issues, no problem. But men in women's sport? Way too complex.
I couldn't stand the man I'm afraid, too full of his own importance. Said that he wasn't political but always voicing his opinion on matters nothing to do with football. I always thought that Alan Hanson was a better and more knowledgeable pundit. Grossly overpaid and only got the job because his face fitted at the time and was an establishment figure.
Agree with his politics, can't be bothered with his smugness and arrogance on MotD.
Talk about the football Gary, other than that just STFU.
We've plenty of other people better qualified and with big platforms who can publicise what's going on in Gaza so that we can then carry on ignoring Netanyahu's deranged pogrom.
Footballers really aren't "establishment figures."Quote:
Originally Posted by James70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thatdayinmay16
:agree:
In this country, that's a big no-no.
Regardless of personal political opinions, BBC are supposed to be an impartial broadcaster, therefore their employees should be. Lineker has failed to be that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hibspur
What did Lineker say that was anti-semitic?
:dunno:
Quote:
Originally Posted by James70
Lineker wasn't a pundit, he was the host. Very different role.
This is like criticising Boyle for not being the best centre back in our squad.
He reposted something from a Palestinian activist about Zionism on instagram which had a rat emoji on it. He claims he didn't notice the rat and even if he had he wouldn't have realised it was an antisemitic trope used by the Nazis. However, when made aware he deleted the post and apologised.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith_M
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeMeSouviens
Thanks, I must have missed that.
:aok:
But noone with a functioning brain genuinely, truly believes Lineker is ACTUALLY anti-Semitic. Thats ludicrous. Its a debate based on distraction and falsehoods, smear and diversion. Looking at and learning about whats genuinely happening and tolerated in that part of the world is so distressing and enough to make you lose your grip on reality, so its hardly surprising distraction and disinformation works.Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith_M
The rights or wrongs of retweets aside I don't mind him and respect the fact that he can laugh at himself literally crapping himself on the pitch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Fw088iGTlM
Andrew Neil was, and still is, a right wing zealot and has never disguised it, particularly when he was interviewing anybody left of centre. It's a disgrace that somebody with the very obvious right wing views he had was allowed to host any kind of political programme. As a union official for over 35 years I've never had any respect for the man, he was given a platform to promote his views by the BBC and is now on that right wing garbage otherwise known as GB News, but you're quite right he was never a sports presenter. Apologies by the way, I'm not having a dig at you personally at all and we're all entitled to different points of view obviously, I just hope to God he's not a Hibs fan!Quote:
Originally Posted by He's here!
You're right but I think the reaction of the BBC and parts of its audience are a bit selective in that regard.Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul1642
I give you openly tory supporting and everyone's favourite DJ, who did a bit more than DJ'ing Sir Jimmy Saville for example. Never pulled up for his political views, or anything else.
Sent from my SM-A750FN using Tapatalk
Spot on in ever point. In my opinionQuote:
Originally Posted by allmodcons