Originally Posted by
Bad Martini
There is no comparison as far as I am concerned.
Lennon by a country mile for many reasons.
Putting aside the goalkeeping issues Mowbray had, he DID have a great squad and some great players. He made an arse of some man management by all accounts, teams were great when great but too often were inconsistent. Worse still; we bottled it when it mattered. As Green Day said, nice guys finish last. Mowbray was by all accounts a "nice guy" (though screwed up the Riordan thing and some other player issues as I mentioned) BUT, he won nothing.
Sick of this pish about how Tony's team won the cup. Tony's team had plenty chances to win a cup; they bottled it. Bottom line. Looked good sometimes but bottled it. Whether folk dewy eyed or not like it, John Collins, was a winner. He won the cup. WITH Tony's Team? I have my doubts on that and if he did, why couldn't uncle Tony manage it with "his" team?
Nice guy but won nothing.
No comparison to Lennon and not so poor off as some suggest.
If Lennon had inherited the "golden generation" I'd wager he would have done more with them, got more from them and won something/more.
No hard feelings to Mowbray; he produced some good football and the results versus der hun were braw. But, ultimately insignificant when we won nowt.
Lennon on the other hand, given some time....who knows.:flag: