Of course, "properties in Scotland" doesn't just mean Hearts. It also includes those buildings in St Andrews Sq that he bought near the top of the market.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...iness-16490988
Printable View
Of course, "properties in Scotland" doesn't just mean Hearts. It also includes those buildings in St Andrews Sq that he bought near the top of the market.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...iness-16490988
I'm sure that the yaks will be included in the bad stuff. Anyone seeking to buy them will have to find:
- more cash than any property developer would be willing to pay (£3 million say?)
- a few million in working capital to keep it going (£2 million say?)
- £5 million for a new stand.
So, all they need to do is find someone with £10 million to ***** away with no hope of ever getting a return on that money. Best of luck with that.
Two points:-
1. you will be hard pushed to find any lender who would allow a business to go that far. UKIO/UBIG were a special case, as they had a business model which required that investment, and had the funds to support it. It failed.
2. it doesn't matter whether someone pays £3m or £20m for Tynie. The company (HMFC) is insolvent, and any money raised will go to its creditors.
Not sure if this is at all possible, but a Hun told me he thought it was an option. Rangers buy hearts, debt and all, sell tynecastle change the name to rangers and be back in the spl. Obviously if they bought hearts debt and all, they would need to pay the debt back, but after selling off all of hearts assets the debt would be manageable for rangers and they would be back in the spl!
Again not sure if this could happen but would be interesting
The dominoes begin to topple...
Bankruptcy to be declared on Ukio Bankas bad assets
So I'm maybe getting ahead of myself here but could hearts be made bankrupt tomorrow for example and then worry about the sale of tynecastle etc at a later date?
Is there a possibility hearts won't even see out the season or will this all take time to come to a head properly?
I guess it will take a wee while to wash through the system. UBIG will be right in there amongst the bad bits, and will now be starved of any further capital. If UBIG is burning cash then the shutters would come down on UBIG very quickly if it cannot find any other sources of capital.
Since the security over tiny is held separately from UBIG I cannot see how UBIG can now sell the club easily and on the cheap, and so the yaks fate now goes hand-in-hand with that of UBIG.
Thing is, the geezer that runs the yaks is also a director of UBIG. If the yaks really wanted to know the fate of their club then the bloke that can provide the answers is sitting at tiny, except that those poor sods are terrified to ask the question.
I'm just thinking there's probably someone sat in an office in Lithuania either at ukio or ubig that must be noticing there's a 2 bob football club in Edinburgh that owes them a fortune, has assets but losing them a fortune every day they're open.
If it was me looking at it the first thing I'd say is let's take any cash from them, close them down so they don't lose any more money then look to sell the assets.
Suppose I just don't understand why they'd keep them open for a day longer when they're only going ti lose more money?
Hope they are brighter than this guy on the Brokeback thread 'Bankruptcy':
jambosdad
Quote:
There was always something funny about the sudden desperate call for funds to see us through the season.
http://www.scotsman.com/business/ban...bank-1-2807982
The above is yesterdays headline "Hearts assets will transfer to second Lithuanian bank" although there is nothing in the copy to say this will happen. Smells like waffle.