:greengrin
Printable View
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LzhCLzfJFg
The Canadian vibe is definitely, 'Come ahead, then...:take that'
Today's front page of Canada's 'paper of record'.
https://bsky.app/profile/drbiblioman.../3ljncazwsj22l
Canada’s response https://www.facebook.com/reel/534550...eQ9V&fs=e&fs=e
The guy who set a mob loose on the Capitol resulting in the deaths of 5 police officers has now signed a presidential decree ordering the mandatory death sentence for killing a police officer.
I don’t agree with the death penalty whatsoever but I’ve no issue with the presidential order for the punishment being the most severe penalty possible.
The fact he pardoned those involved in riots killing 5 police officers a few weeks ago makes an utter mockery of it though. Kill a police officer for Trump and you’ll be fine. For any other reason, death.
"if you don't do as i say" :faf:
hurry the **** up and depart this earth Trump for the love of god
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlT3fTkX...jpg&name=large
The answer is really somewhere in the middle.
The actual payer of an import tariff is the importer.
In this case it’s likely to be the American based company that’s doing the importing. But not all importers will be American companies.
The consumer may end up covering that cost through higher end retail prices but that’s certainly not always the case.
There is plenty of evidence of tariffs being absorbed, at least by some degree, by margin contraction on the sending side as the foreign entity takes some of the hit to try and keep its products competitive. There is good evidence that is what happened the last time Trump applied tariffs last time around.
The importers can also absorb some of the cost in the same way.
So while it’s not wrong to say ‘the consumer pays’ it’s not an absolute truth either.
What is certainly true is that the Chinese or whoever will not be paying these tariffs directly to the US Treasury.
https://www.politico.eu/article/dona...ro-poroshenko/
KYIV — Four senior members of Donald Trump’s entourage have held secret discussions with some of Kyiv’s top political opponents to Volodymyr Zelenskyy, just as Washington aligns with Moscow in seeking to lever the Ukrainian president out of his job.
i wonder if any of them are pro-putin
Tariffs are basically a tool for promoting homegrown products and disadvantaging importing products, Trump keeps trumpeting this line that they'll create $squillions for the US economy when that is not their function. This is going to see a rise in prices which'll lead to a rise in inflation and also lower confidence in the $, pretty dangerous really as the $ is seen as the worlds reserved currency. Hopefully the UK doesn't do its usual and mirror the US economy.
Yes, if I was into stocks that’s where I would be looking. Europe rearming will drive a huge amount of growth over next few years. I expect that a few countries like Poland and the Baltics will be looking to build a nuclear deterrent now as well.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...57638394b5.jpg
Going to be a big recession.[emoji106]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If markets hate anything it’s uncertainty.
And boy has Trump caused that.
Already US consumer comfort’s plummeting, seems business investment is going the same way.
His random approach is making it increasingly impossible for any corporation to make investment plans so they simply stop doing so.
The knock on effects for the US economy could be significant indeed with shock waves felt around the world.
We’ll see how long his popularity lasts when his actions drive down the S&P, drive up inflation and cause labour market chaos.
As the US has substantially more domestic stock market investors than almost any other country its domestic political fortunes are almost uniquely tied to it as a key metric of how the US population measures its wealth.
Trump might find that people turn on him way quicker than he thinks.
Today's mayhem seems to include shutting down the Department of Education (as forewarned), and removing responsibility to the states. This is expected to harm special needs education, which is guaranteed by the DoE up until age 21.
And the Post Office leadership is to be removed, and the institution to be controlled by the Executive Office. No way this is going to affect postal voting. No siree :rolleyes:
Edit: I'm off out for a long and brisk walk. Will be buying a bottle of Canadian whisky from our friendly local liquor store on the way back.