Share Transfers Agreed/Cooling off period

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by clerriehibs

Pc gone mad. He didn't suggest ngoo had a diet of bananas like a monkey, he just described his hand as massive. Absolutely nothing wrong with his choice of words, to say otherwise is **** stirring.

---

Correct. **** stirring. :-)

Still, he should have known better.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by green glory

Sorry if posted earlier, but I see Barry Anderson has put his foot in it today. Poor choice of words.


https://twitter.com/barryanderson_8/...61192572350464

---

What does shaking hands like a bunch of bananas feel like? Did his hands go all squishy or something? As that's what happens to bananas when you squeeze them.

Similes aren't his strong point clearly. EEN are paying him too much and I don't even know what he's on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Famous5forever

i am totally hacked off with this news it was only a few weeks ago the game was over the PBS Was going to be shut down and that nutter Vlad was being made Bankrupt, WTF Now roll forward too present day they have signed 2 Liverpool players and will probably have 2 cups in the bag come April and an additional 500k to boot.

the financial meltdown we all hope for has been delayed only for a few months it will happen though i am sure of that :flag:

---

Ha ha ha!
tell me about the two cups that you will win before April .
you obviously have an IQ of about seven

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveF

I've never heard anyone ever say "Nice to meet you. Wow, your hands are like a bunch of banana's" :greengrin

---

They say that over in Fyffe:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

there's stories going around that they're not paying a bolt towards the 2 Liverpool loanees.

---

:hmmm: If it's true that they're paying the 'puddlians nothing, then it's going to be interesting when the loans are up and they come to replace these players. The replacements, to comply with the rule that incomers must be paid less than outgoers, will have to pay the yams!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reallapsedhibee

:hmmm: If it's true that they're paying the 'puddlians nothing, then it's going to be interesting when the loans are up and they come to replace these players. The replacements, to comply with the rule that incomers must be paid less than outgoers, will have to pay the yams!

---

I'm sure once the loans are up their restrictions will have been fully lifted and they'll be back to deliberately offering 6-8k for Jon Daly/Chris Erskine/whoever it is we're after.

You can just see it ****ing coming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Baldy Foghorn

They say that over in Fyffe:greengrin

---

I thought he'd left the Club?

:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reallapsedhibee

:hmmm: If it's true that they're paying the 'puddlians nothing, then it's going to be interesting when the loans are up and they come to replace these players. The replacements, to comply with the rule that incomers must be paid less than outgoers, will have to pay the yams!

---

The restrictions are due to be lifted at the end of the season I believe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reallapsedhibee

:hmmm: If it's true that they're paying the 'puddlians nothing, then it's going to be interesting when the loans are up and they come to replace these players. The replacements, to comply with the rule that incomers must be paid less than outgoers, will have to pay the yams!

---

What if they're paying LFC direct or is that normal procedure anyway?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hiberlin

What if they're paying LFC direct or is that normal procedure anyway?

---

They should get the fans' bairns to pay LFC direct out of their pocket/christmas/birthday money, cut out some of the middleman inefficiency.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by reallapsedhibee

They should get the fans' bairns to pay LFC direct out of their pocket/christmas/birthday money, cut out some of the middleman inefficiency.

---

Can't do that mate, that's tantamount to child abuse. Oh wait a minute :hmmm:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hiberlin

What if they're paying LFC direct or is that normal procedure anyway?

---

I doubt very much that Liverpool or any other team on the planet for that matter would give Hearts any sort of credit facility, unless they like being bumped that is

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Famous5forever

i am totally hacked off with this news it was only a few weeks ago the game was over the PBS Was going to be shut down and that nutter Vlad was being made Bankrupt, WTF Now roll forward too present day they have signed 2 Liverpool players and will probably have 2 cups in the bag come April and an additional 500k to boot.

the financial meltdown we all hope for has been delayed only for a few months it will happen though i am sure of that :flag:

---

Right I'm going to rise to the Jambo baiting.

The game is still almost over at the Wongadome. They are pissin against the wind financially especially if they don't get anyone else sold for decent money this window. None of the major earners have gone so a big hole in income v expenditure exists. Remember the big tax bill didn't go away in December, it is due in May

Think you are stretching it saying two Liverpool players. A once promising Rangers player and a huddy youngster, nobody in England wanted on loan would be a better description.

Glad you all think 2 cups are in the bag this season, take it you mean League Cup but I can't think of any other cups Hearts are still in. :greengrin

Finally, they will not get an additional £500,000 for getting to the League Cup final. The Evening News figures were plucked out the air and referred to £500,000 they will earn out the entire cup run. Can't see it being that much as I doubt they will sell many strips on the back of the "little cup" final which doesn't matter to any of them.

The clock is still ticking and Hearts will struggle financially for a long time to come if they survive at all.

LTYF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PatHead

Right I'm going to rise to the Jambo baiting.

The game is still almost over at the Wongadome. They are pissin against the wind financially especially if they don't get anyone else sold for decent money this window. None of the major earners have gone so a big hole in income v expenditure exists. Remember the big tax bill didn't go away in December, it is due in May

Think you are stretching it saying two Liverpool players. A once promising Rangers player and a huddy youngster, nobody in England wanted on loan would be a better description.

Glad you all think 2 cups are in the bag this season, take it you mean League Cup but I can't think of any other cups Hearts are still in. :greengrin

Finally, they will not get an additional £500,000 for getting to the League Cup final. The Evening News figures were plucked out the air and referred to £500,000 they will earn out the entire cup run. Can't see it being that much as I doubt they will sell many strips on the back of the "little cup" final which doesn't matter to any of them.

The clock is still ticking and Hearts will struggle financially for a long time to come if they survive at all.

LTYF

---

:agree:

Hibs.net. Serving the bipolar community.

Well said Pat.

There was a six million (at least) hole last year covered by yet another of Vlad's debt for equity swaps which swallowed it. That appears not to be on the agenda for this year.

Remember last year they won the Scottish Cup with the associated income that brought.

This season they have the Liverpool ties money, money from Wallace and Templeton, and a run to the Diddy Cup Final and £1m approx from fans and share issue. Despite all this they have repeatedly failed to pay players on timne and have multiple other debts (inluding rent and rated to CEC)

Does this add up to £6 million? Nope.

They have the first instalment of the tax bill due in May iirc and they are due to start repaying Vlad on top of the shortfall.

The figures just don't stack up.

Tick tock.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

They could get some more loans, there's stories going around that they're not paying a bolt towards the 2 Liverpool loanees.

---

Harumph! To think I once had a soft spot for Liverpool - if they're dishing out players to the Yams for free they can go and frock themselves :bye::grr::fuming:

https://www.duedil.com/company/SC291...n-2005-limited


Any ideas why the Yams are making alterations to the Articles of association of " Heart of Midlothian 2005 Ltd " in the last few days ?

The only directors are Serge and Roman and it allows them to act and vote on issues in which they have a personal interest.

Love the Company valuation Minus £ 2.7 BILLION !!!!:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

https://www.duedil.com/company/SC291...n-2005-limited


Any ideas why the Yams are making alterations to the Articles of association of " Heart of Midlothian 2005 Ltd " in the last few days ?

The only directors are Serge and Roman and it allows them to act and vote on issues in which they have a personal interest.

Love the Company valuation Minus £ 2.7 BILLION !!!!:greengrin

---

To anyone who thinks the yams will survive try having a look on sickbag.
thread Snippet from hms dinner.
Even they know they are truly ******.
Sorry if this has been posted before

Can some of the more enlightened amongst us explain why Hearts have an "issued share capital" figure of £146.9m

By contrast Hibs appear to have an "issued share capital" figure of £1.2m

I seem to rememer that STF put £1m ish into the club to cover the shortfalls and is this the £1.2m shown? What does the £147m mean then in Hearts case?

Apologies in advance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by einstein

To anyone who thinks the yams will survive try having a look on sickbag.
thread Snippet from hms dinner.
Even they know they are truly ******.
Sorry if this has been posted before

---

I'll believe it when/if it actually happens.

They've been on the edge of doom for years, but still, they're here and managing to sign decent players on low fees. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hibercelona

I'll believe it when/if it actually happens.

They've been on the edge of doom for years, but still, they're here and managing to sign decent players on low fees. :rolleyes:

---

Ok I understand your opinion and fair enough it always seems to be the end is nigh for them but never happens.
Did you read the thread on sickbag.
This is from their own fans.
They have put all that money into that hidious little club and they are still utterly utterly skint.
They want to sell season tickets early to raise cash to pay for their debts,tax bills,wages etc.
I am not the brightest of people,hence the user name Einstein ,but even I can see the writing on the wall .
The quicker they die the happier I will be. GGTTH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hibercelona

I'll believe it when/if it actually happens.

They've been on the edge of doom for years, but still, they're here and managing to sign decent players on low fees. :rolleyes:

---

Yeah I think you might have mentioned once or twice that you don't think it's going to happen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by The Falcon

Can some of the more enlightened amongst us explain why Hearts have an "issued share capital" figure of £146.9m

By contrast Hibs appear to have an "issued share capital" figure of £1.2m

I seem to rememer that STF put £1m ish into the club to cover the shortfalls and is this the £1.2m shown? What does the £147m mean then in Hearts case?

Apologies in advance.

---

The share capital is what has been paid in by shareholders to finance the running of the company. It also includes that part of the debt to UBIG/UKIO that was converted to shares over the past couple of years. It will almost certainly never be repaid.

By contrast, Hibs' share capital would be repaid in the event of our winding-up. We have sufficient assets to enable us to pay off all our debts, and to leave plenty to return to the shareholders.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by einstein

Ok I understand your opinion and fair enough it always seems to be the end is nigh for them but never happens.
Did you read the thread on sickbag.
This is from their own fans.
They have put all that money into that hidious little club and they are still utterly utterly skint.
They want to sell season tickets early to raise cash to pay for their debts,tax bills,wages etc.
I am not the brightest of people,hence the user name Einstein ,but even I can see the writing on the wall .
The quicker they die the happier I will be. GGTTH

---

Don't get me wrong. Nobody want's them to go to the wall anymore than myself. But they just always seem to hang on that little bit longer.

Just when you think their time is up, they wriggle their way into another final and get more survival cash to keep them going.

It just doesn't feel like its ever going to actually happen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EH6 Hibby

Yeah I think you might have mentioned once or twice that you don't think it's going to happen.

---

Unfortunately he doesn't have the mental capacity to work it out so hitting the repeat button suits him fine.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

https://www.duedil.com/company/SC291...n-2005-limited


Any ideas why the Yams are making alterations to the Articles of association of " Heart of Midlothian 2005 Ltd " in the last few days ?

The only directors are Serge and Roman and it allows them to act and vote on issues in which they have a personal interest.

Love the Company valuation Minus £ 2.7 BILLION !!!!:greengrin

---

Replying to my own post is bad form, I know, but curiosity got the better of me with this deficit of £ 2.7 Billion, so I looked up the accounts on Companies House Web-site and it is an error by www.duedil.com. The debt is actually £2.7 million.

I thought Vlad had been trying to load the Lithuanian National Debt onto the Yams to get himself elected. :greengrin

Still, it is an extra £ 2.7 million Vlad has blown on his Yam adventure that I don't think it is noted as part of the Football Club debt.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by greenginger

Replying to my own post is bad form, I know, but curiosity got the better of me with this deficit of £ 2.7 Billion, so I looked up the accounts on Companies House Web-site and it is an error by www.duedil.com. The debt is actually £2.7 million.

I thought Vlad had been trying to load the Lithuanian National Debt onto the Yams to get himself elected. :greengrin

Still, it is an extra £ 2.7 million Vlad has blown on his Yam adventure that I don't think it is noted as part of the Football Club debt.

---

Although it would seem to be self explanatory what does 'Dissolution notice issued' actually mean?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EuanH78

Although it would seem to be self explanatory what does 'Dissolution notice issued' actually mean?

---

A company can be dissolved for a number of reasons. They could start the process themselves, or Companies House can start it... perhaps because they haven't filed Accounts or the Annual Return. From what you have posted, they haven't done either for over a year.

Either way, the notice has to be advertised in the Edinburgh Gazette for 90 days. During that time, anyone who objects to the company's dissolution can raise that objection; that is often HMRC, who might be owed taxes. If no-one objects, the company is formally dissolved at the end of that period.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mikey

Unfortunately he doesn't have the mental capacity to work it out so hitting the repeat button suits him fine.

---

Is it a personal whitch hunt' or can anybody join in ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod

A company can be dissolved for a number of reasons. They could start the process themselves, or Companies House can start it... perhaps because they haven't filed Accounts or the Annual Return. From what you have posted, they haven't done either for over a year.

Either way, the notice has to be advertised in the Edinburgh Gazette for 90 days. During that time, anyone who objects to the company's dissolution can raise that objection; that is often HMRC, who might be owed taxes. If no-one objects, the company is formally dissolved at the end of that period.

---

So is this a new developement and is it serious?