Let property should definitely be a separate use class.
Printable View
Jobs will follow infrastructure. Government can change where they want to invest. That’s why all the best paid jobs are in the south of England. That’s where all the infrastructure investment happens.
If the govt wanted to double the size of Inverness by improving its connectivity, investing in its attractiveness to business it could do that easily.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Went to look at a small 3 bed newbuild a few months back. It had went up £30k compared to the same house built less than a year ago in the same development. The mortgage would have been close to £1300 a month till the day I retired.
Just feel like I've missed the boat now with it all. My mate always jokes about spam valley, folk with the houses and cars for show but can't afford to go to the pub or do anything else. I take it rising interest rates could potentially cause a crash in years to come?
Sent from my Pixel 4a using Tapatalk
I'm one that got on the property ladder at the end of the 1970s. Interest rates in double figures, and your mortgage was linked to your salary. 2.5x man's salary + the wives salary. Didn't matter my wife earned more.
How is it possible for people nowadays?
Fek knows. This wage to house price graph is frightening.
Attachment 25993
:agree: It must be a nightmare for young couples looking to set up their first home. The lack of available decent housing pushes up not only house prices but also rent on the most modest of accommodation and thus putting it out of reach for many. Waiting on a council house is like waiting on dead man's boots. Our generation had it easy, we inherited many houses that were previously company supplied in mining and industrial communities where the industries had gone to the wall, of course that brought other problems with it but affordable housing availability wasn't one of them.
In Berlin there are similar problems and there was recently a referendum asking if the authorities should have the right to look at using compulsory government acquisition of property from multiple property owners to free up accommodation for those who need it.
It is almost impossible. I bought my first house late (7 years ago) but was fortunate enough to be able to buy without borrowing. Getting on the property ladder for young couples means committing to mortgages that mean they have little or no expendable income, how can a society strive when the population has little or no money available for anything other than essentials? If people can't afford things then recession is not far behind.
The wife and i were lucky starting out, we used the help to buy scheme, this was 9 years ago, so only had to put down 5%, was still hard saving but cut back on loads and managed, hard when you have kids also but we wanted away from paying huge ampunts on rent, was a pain when you go to sell as you obviously give loads back but was totally worth it, selling then gave us the deposit for our current house. If these deals come up again id recommend them to first time buyers
Yeah we ended up scoring out of it, we had a lot of interest in our house so sold for more than the asking price, as i say help to buy was amazing for us, we had one kid at the time and paying more than double in rent than what our mortgage ended up being. We are also fortunate that we could save, not everyone has that luxury unfortunately
The trouble is, in at least my area, farmers are selling off fields in 1 acre sometimes 2 acre plots with outlining planning for 1 house on each. Fields which could see 60/70 maybe 80 social homes are being sold for 10 - 12 huge self builds.
An example here https://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/de...b3a76f9aff44aa I think there's around 8 of those things built in 1 field and they're cropping up all over the place.
We keep saying that. It’s worst in London and that hasn’t burst. It’s largely been driven by cheap money (including buy-to-let mortgages) but the prices are baked in now. In 2008, London prices didn’t much shift, just the supply of homes reduced (to 1/3).
The competitive land market also leads to prices getting pushed up.
I’d like to see supply increased through small new towns and villages (I’m not a huge fan of Prince Charles but his Poundbury scheme is not a bad model compared to the 60s versions and would, I think, be resisted less. Maybe the land should be nationalised so the costs can be kept down and more affordable homes provided.
We have pretty small houses in this country compared to our neighbours. I don’t think that’s the problem.
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...0181f6fd16.jpg
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not saying it's the problem but it certainly aint helping. It'd be interesting to see those figures based on say the last 20 years of building, I'd guess we'd be up that list a bit. Post war council houses and old mining houses etc will be dragging that down a bit.
I agree, the very first field sold out here around 25 - 30 years ago, it was actually on the news because the seller had gotten round planning by stating they were to be crofts. Every house was built with a shed to keep bantoms. Those plots were IIRC £35k for 1 acre and buyers were left to their own devices on the design, there's some serious monstrosities up there.