If it's deemed to have been a frivolous appeal the ban can be increased by one game.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
I'd say it's unlikely to happen though.
Printable View
If it's deemed to have been a frivolous appeal the ban can be increased by one game.Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
I'd say it's unlikely to happen though.
I've seen it several times now and I still think it's a red card.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
Not a chance it will be pulled. I hope he doesn’t get more for appealing. We need him playing.
Don’t think it’s ever happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir David Gray
I can't think of an example either to be honest, just thought I'd point out that the rule does exist.Quote:
Originally Posted by hibbysam
Quote:
Originally Posted by hibbysam
Maybe not aformal appeal, but they did try to have it overturned on the grounds that the referee was a twat!
Quote:
Aberdeen held talks with the governing body in an attempt to have it overturned but FIFA rules only allow a yellow card to be rescinded for cases of mistaken identity or simulation, so Ojo is now banned for Sunday’s clash with Celtic.
Nah. In real time first view I did think it was him being off balance and falling backwards, but the replays clearly show a voluntary straightening of the leg into the RC player. No need. It is deliberate action with intent and rightly red.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
I'm glad Christian is not scheduled to appear in front of the Hibs Net judiciary panel otherwise he'd be shot at dawn!
I don't think it will be overturned but I presume our case will centre on him being off balance and also the Ross County player's hands were on his leg so they might say he was trying to shake him off. However it's not as if the guy has a grip on him so I think our case won't be strong enough to prove the ref has made a blatant error. Don't know if the player's character comes into it but violent conduct is totally against Doidge's character.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
Reckon there’s an outside chance of this appeal being successful. Yellow card was about right for the “crime”. There were about three more dangerous tackles/flying arms which went unpunished compared to Doidge’’s tangle.
Correct, the boys tackle on Cadden was a shocker.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carheenlea
They tend to be very prescriptive hence even in the most extreme cases of unfairness such as the Ojo yellow card they couldn't do the right thing and resind it.Quote:
Originally Posted by 007
Doidge was sent off for 2 yellows in a game last season so not going in with a blank sheet.
As I said this incident looked like a red card for violent conduct but when you look at all the circumstances it isn't so straight forward, however, as you say the appeal is unlikely to be successful unless a wordsmith argues his case.
Agree with some important points you’re making on this - his standing leg is definitely in an unusually vulnerable position, especially given the immediate proximity and movement of the opponent and i think he feels under a bit threat because of that, particularly after a spell out with an injury. But I think it’s the clear force of the high loose one going into the player that’s going to make the appeal unsuccessful.Quote:
Originally Posted by CMurdoch
But you never know - I stopped trying to second guess the inner workings of the minds of our footballing ‘authorities’ many years ago.
I'm not sure other tackles in the game will be used as a measurement for whether the appeal will be successful or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carheenlea
The incident will be judged in its own right, as it should be, and if we take the green specs off it's definitely in red card territory.
I'd be astonished if the appeal is successful.
He would survive though as the Hibsnet firing squad are poor shots. Bit early in the morn too. :wink:Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Bear
Subjective of course, and the only opinion that matters really is that of the panel. Quietly hopeful!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir David Gray
Appeal will be held tonight so will know either way ahead of tomorrow
Apologies for my misinformation - serves me right for believing the “it’s just a grand each time”.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir David Gray
In that case we’d deserve to get an extra game for appealing that…(not that it’ll happen obviously)
Or a few people are able to look at the challenge objectively, like grown ups, and see there’s absolutely no argument against the red card, and therefore just say that rather than pretending otherwise because it’s hibs and a player we like.Quote:
Originally Posted by Golden Bear
It’s worse every time I see the replay.. he’s actually raked his studs down the boy after extending his leg.
If that had been Morelos (or any non hibs player for that matter) we’d be going absolutely radge about it.
It won’t be changed. It shouldn’t have been appealed. It was stupid from Doidge. Time to move on and accept it.
Agreed - it was daft unfortunately. No chance it will be overturned:(Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
Mad how quick they can hear an appeal when it's us.Quote:
Originally Posted by SMAXXA
When it's another team it can take weeks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeeRussell
If it was Moreles he would have been booked so he couldn't have got a retrospective red. I think that is something we could cite in our favour pointing to previous incidents that were given as yellow. We could probably spend an hour just on Morelos
I can’t think that pointing to challenges by other players that should have been reds but weren’t, will help Doidge get off with with a red that was rightly given, but we’ll see.Quote:
Originally Posted by wookie70
Personally think there’s absolutely zero chance of getting the red overturned regardless of how we pitch it, and rightly so, but again we will see.
Appeal rejected
They were basically told from the offset that they stood no chance based on the rules. Broadfoot explained the process well on one of this weeks sportsound shows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Moulin Yarns
Doidge appeal unsuccessful.
No surprise there. They’d have been as well standing outside the ticket office and handing the first fan that went past a grand.Quote:
Originally Posted by h185forever
Literally no idea why we appealed this tbh
Doesn't surprise me.Quote:
Originally Posted by h185forever
Because in normal circumstances the hearing wouldn't have been organised so quickly, and we've have had Doidge available tomorrow when Boyle is out, then suspended once Boyle is back.Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderhibbie76
Because James Scott might have to play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Borderhibbie76
I might change my prediction to St Johnstone 1, Hibs -1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Since452
And if he's reading this, please make me look like an idiot, James.