Aye. For me, 4 points from our 2 games is a good start. 2 points is a poor start and one I don't see us qualifying from.
So if we don't win it's not all over but realistically I think we need to win to have a good go at qualifying.
Printable View
I agree with this 100%.
Scotland are more likely to view a point tonight as a decent outcome - and for it to ultimately cost them.
I didn’t think the result the other night was that bad. Be clinical against the bottom 3 teams and let the rest of it take care of itself head to head.
We’re just a bit short of firepower and more likely to do something daft defensively for me to be genuinely confident, although we’ve got a good few more good players than we’ve had at any point over the past 20 odd years.
I think we almost have to find a way to get Tierney into a back 3, and as unorthodox as it is, give him a fee role on the left hand side. Have both Tierney & Robertson overlap each other and that should allow one of them to get some time and space to get quality into the box.
I think both Robertson and Tierney like coming from deep and like to be the overlapper rather than the overlappee. Robertson looks a bit lost when asked to start higher up the park. Many full backs struggle when asked to do this despite being great attacking players.
I'd go a flat 4 at the back with Robertson at LB and go with Tierney as an orthodox centre back with one other.
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
i though Israel were pretty unlucky not to take something against Denmark, we were unlucky in Israel the last game, i also thought Israel were the better side against us in the two previous games at Hampden, i won't be surprised if they beat us again :(
mon Scotland :saltireflag
Really need to win tonight. Denmark getting a good goal difference today and we still have to play them home and away, as well as Austria away. I hate to say this but it looks like another glorious failure on the cards.
sorry:rolleyes:
Marshall; Hendry, Hanley, Tierney; O'Donnell, McTominay, McGregor, McGinn, Robertson; Fraser, Adams.
Not sure about that team. I'd be starting Christie every game if he's fit. Thought he'd make a change in central defence as well but we shall see.
McGinn’s the top goalscorer in our squad, hope he gets another one tonight
https://www.11v11.com/teams/scotland...ption/scorers/
Christie is mince. Another who wants everything to be fancy and all about him. He puts more shots out the stadium than he does in the net. Fraser is a far better player and far more pace, which we missed the other day. We are a counter attacking side without pace which made no sense and why we struggled a lot. Next job is to find a decent right back.
Clarke is liking the square midfield. I’d probably go with Gallagher than Hanley.
We have struggled against Israel but I think we have changed it up with the addition of:
1. The pace of Adams and Fraser up front
2. The addition of the power and quality of McTominay in midfield
The addition of McGregor in midfield will free up McGinn to play further forward.
In conclusion tonights team is our most offensive line up for a long long time and contains 6 top level outfield players.
They should pose a far greater challenge to Israel than previous workmanlike team selections.
Hendry is my only concern but hopefully the guy plays well.
Don’t think he’d cut it defensively. It is the biggest issue with this squad at the moment though.
When you think back to the 90s we played Craig Burley there, out of position cos he could do the job. Maybe we need to ask another midfielder to take one for the team and play out of position. Armstrong could do it IMO - he’s got bags of energy and wins the ball back a lot for Southampton.
No obvious solution though!