It will be more than a grand surely 😉
Printable View
You can be anti-monarchy and still like the royals. I personally have nothing against any of them, the all seem like a decent enough if slightly weird family (Andrew excepted) but I still think the idea that we have hereditary ruler over us all is absolutely against everything I believe. I would disband it tomorrow. I would be happy enough for them to keep all the wealth they already have and settle into life as a very rich family but they should have no place as head of state. I think it makes us look ridiculous.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think the last few years and in turn the last couple of weeks just proves that the idea Willam and Harry represented a new, reformed and modern Royal Family is and always was a total myth.
It's been morbidly fascinating watching 2 brothers who, on the face of it, seemed genuinely close be ruthlessly dragged apart as one is prepared for his role as the boss of the firm whilst the other becomes increasingly irrelevant as another spare is popped out. There was much commotion when William married a 'commoner' but she has been nicely moulded into the publicly subservient, seen but not heard royal female. He has increasingly been bound by tradition, formality and etiquette; everything his uncle warned about at his mother's funeral. Harry always seems to be just that bit too close to saying what he really thinks about the treatment of his mum, in life and death, as well. His 'dark forces' comment will not have sat well. His wife seems strong willed and opinionated and has obviously been victim of a relentless character assassination by the British press. Whether I like or agree with her is irrelevant, I recognise bullying when I see it.
You have to question how much of the press trashing Harry and Meghan was at the encouragement of the Palace. The firm are ruthless in their dealings with and their control of the press, look at how quickly the furore around Andrew has died down, outcry for a day or 2 and now almost total silence. Yet this hounding of someone higher up the chain went on for a couple of years almost unchallenged.
The whole institution stinks and it will never change. A vipers nest of ruthless, entitled individuals desperate to preserve their status at any cost, the small matter of family won't get in the way.
They're making an awful fuss.
Life won't get any easier for them in the future.
They should realise how fortunate they are and zip it.
This without a doubt. What folk seem to forget is that they genuinely believe ( certainly the queen does ) that they are appointed by divine providence. That aside, their mindset differs very little from their ancestors when it comes to preserving their wealth, status and influence. Their forebears would go to any lengths to keep their 'birthright' and if anybody thinks the 21st century version is any different they are deluded.
All the paper stocking the boot in are the ones getting sued. Piers Morgan is connected with most incidents of phone hacking.
I'm a republican, but can acknowledge the good work that the royals do. This is a good example of this at a pretty basic level; so many people respect and admire them that this sort of story can help to remove stigma. I think the story is more about what the service in question can do for those who need it, rather than whether or not any one person does need it.
I'd like the royal family more if they were like the queen and I.