So an independent Scotland might be better or it might be worse. Is that it?
Printable View
https://twitter.com/sunday_mail/stat...aY_rH0m4EYSRhg
Tomorrow's front page leads on high-value transactions including vehicle purchases being looked at by police investigating allegations of fraud in the SNP.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-65080560
While I don't personally agree a change of PM/FM mid-term necessitates an election, Sarwar is entitled to call out the SNP's double standards here.
I think part.of.the problem was with recent UK government PM changes they made changes that weren't in the party manifesto when elected by the populace but were in their personal ones?
If the new Scottish FM keeps going with the policies the electorate voted for.at the last.eleection then morally its fine, IF they decide to deviate from.that then the right thing to do would be to announce a new election.
Nah, what you’re looking for is:
Well Kato, I’m glad you asked me that question. I’m glad you asked and let me just be absolutely clear on this, our record on being clear about the next ten years is really important. The opposition have had years to sort this and what have we got? Broken promises and empty words. So I just want to be clear about this because it is vitally important, we want to be clear about the next ten years for everyone in this country. No more lies, real clarity for real hard working families.
It's the coached "Let me be clear", that all of the Tory Party peeps come out with at the start of a sentence which let's you know: they aren't going to be clear, they will fudged the answer they've chosen to give, it might not have any bearing on the subject at all, they might lie, they might mention "the British people" - with an appendix of possibilities; "Putins Illegal War", "we're coming out of world-wide pandemic", "we are helping those most in need through the energy crisis".
Absolute hokum.
People fall for the tone, the confidence and, when it's there, the plummy accent.
Sent from my SM-A528B using Tapatalk
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...gn=Social_Flow
Sent from my VOG-L29 using Tapatalk
Unbelievably only 4% of storm drains are monitored in Scotland so we get useless data. Its revealed 14,000 Olympic swimming pools of sewage is poured into Scottish water each year. Who is going to take responsibility.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dai...s-29583848.amp
Fergal Sharkey is picking up the fight
"Sharkey said: “Scotland’s first problem is simply the sheer scale of the lack of monitoring. But from the few bits of data available… there is just as big a scale of sewage dumping going on in Scotland as there is in England and Wales"
Their targets aims and objectives are decided by Scottish ministers. They are only one of the parties that need to take the blame along with Scottish water but mostly Scottish government.
Just as the Tories are ultimately to blame for the filth in English waters and not just the environmental agency, Scottish government should rightly be getting blasted for this, its disgusting.
A spokesman for Scottish Water said: “While we acknowledge that our monitoring coverage is not as high as in England and Wales, it is very important to note that 87 per cent of water bodies in Scotland are in good water quality condition and this compares with 16 per cent south of the border.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sepa's members are chosen by ministers and their objectives are decided by ministers
The article is also about 14,000 swimming pools of ***** being dumped in our water. 12k times sewage was poured into our water. Sepas 87% satisfactory is a nonsense as almost half of sites weren't checked due to poor monitoring. No monitoring on the water of leith, only 350 of 3700 sites are checked.
It’s outflows that weren’t monitored. The waterways are. The whole story is full of guesswork about levels of pollution. And that’s enough to make the story. Levels of discharge should be monitored more. There was no need to add guesses about how bad things might be.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk