Share Transfers Agreed/Cooling off period

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

Is it really necessary to multi quote so many different posts? You do this on a regular basis and to be honest with you it's quite annoying.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MacBean

:agree:

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hank Schrader

:agree:

Irritates me too, please stop Weststandwanab, there surely isn't any need to respond to all those posts!!

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

The multiquote feature is fine, but when you're selecting numerous random posts and responding with short answers every time on a daily basis then it gets quite annoying. The point is there's no need at all to respond to all these posts!

---

Doesn't bother me at all








:wink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mikey

Do we know that for sure? It doesn't count if it's in the papers :greengrin

We were working on the basis that the £535k footballing debt was to be paid from that. If it is the case then that's another big chunk they've got to find.

---

Mikey, think the papers have it wrong slightly. I am sure they were advanced 150k right at the start of the admin process, then there will be 535k ring fenced for football debts which is about the 690k mark.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CropleyWasGod

Okay, returning to this.

1. in the books of FOH, there is no profit. Donations received are paid out. There is no trading, either. Result... no Corporation Tax or VAT.

2. in Bidco's books, slightly more complicated. Bidco is putting up cash to fund the first few years. £2.5m for the club, £1m for initial working capital, and then "not less than" £1.4m for WC for each of the next two seasons. Total, at least, £6.3m.

That money will be either AB's personally, paid in either in the form of a loan or shares, or put up by a bank. However that part is structured, the payments from FOH will be repayments of that. Result, no CT or VAT.

---

Cheers CWG, and weststandwanabee above (whose multiquote replies I like).

Looks like instead of paying tax on investment earnings I should just get a football club, donate all I have and sit back and collect the profits every year. Anyone know a big team that's going cheap and bound to be in the black for years to come?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

The multiquote feature is fine, but when you're selecting numerous random posts and responding with short answers every time on a daily basis then it gets quite annoying. The point is there's no need at all to respond to all these posts!

---

Just ignore them then :dunno:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sergey

I'm stuck on a crossword clue:

The chances of Heart of Midlothian finding happiness this week (4, 3)

---

Alls baz
:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StevieC

Just ignore them then :dunno:

---

Or better yet, ask the only person on this entire forum who does this regularly to stop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

The multiquote feature is fine, but when you're selecting numerous random posts and responding with short answers every time on a daily basis then it gets quite annoying. The point is there's no need at all to respond to all these posts!

---

I wish you would stop posting. Your really annoying .

Any chance we can get back on topic please folks :wink:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StevieC

Just ignore them then :dunno:

---

I like his multi-quote posting style. It's easier to ignore him in large chunks than lots of individual replies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mikey

Any chance we can get back on topic please folks :wink:

---

****** the hearts:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hibbill2002

I wish you would stop posting. Your really annoying .

---

Sorry if I wind you up so much buddy, can't say I've even noticed you before. Here's another post to annoy you.

Calling me buddy is really annoying, please stop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Glesgahibby

If its "to big a political issue"then it would be a"mother of political issue"to explain to normal(non hearts fans)taxpaying/voters why you would do such a thing.
Its pretty clear the sports hacks in this country don't have a clue and are very bias towards the hearts cause.Can you imagine a proper political/mainstream journalist getting his teeth into this.
Forget the council,do you think the SNP as a party would risk this?
threatening another European government

---

Threaten another European government? That could be considered an act of war. With no Yams around, who would save us?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by EH6 Hibby

Threaten another European government? That could be considered an act of war. With no Yams around, who would save us?

---

Shhhh,I was hoping they wouldn't think of that:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hibbill2002

Calling me buddy is really annoying, please stop.

---

Good, my work here is done. Bye

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

Is it really necessary to multi quote so many different posts? You do this on a regular basis and to be honest with you it's quite annoying.

---

:faf:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Geo_1875

I like his multi-quote posting style. It's easier to ignore him in large chunks than lots of individual replies.

---

:tee hee:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

Is it really necessary to multi quote so many different posts? You do this on a regular basis and to be honest with you it's quite annoying.

---

May I respectfully suggest you vote with your eyes ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by #FromTheCapital

Sorry if I wind you up so much buddy, can't say I've even noticed you before. Here's another post to annoy you.

---

:greengrin

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StevieC

It doesn't annoy me, infact I prefer that to individually replying to half a dozen posts. Isn't that the purpose of the multiquote feature?

---

Thank you.

Funnily enough I thought that was the purpose of the Multi quote too -

:duck::duck:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hibbill2002

Calling me buddy is really annoying, please stop.

---

:greengrin

Are they deid yet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by s.a.m

:agree: Me too.

---

Thanks to you and others for taking the time to post on this - in a singular format.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Weststandwanab

May I respectfully suggest you vote with your eyes ?

---

Where's the rest of the quotes?

Back on topic...


Before I choose to believe this 'PR man for the SNP', 'insider at Bloomberg', etc, any chance of naming names?

if you claim to know someone in the know, and that person has nothing to fear by being named, why not just tell us who it is?


Much worse than weststandwanabee's multi-quotes are all these people claiming some informative source, when most of them are talking out of their *rses.

Can you please keep the thread on track people

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scott7_0(Prague)

Are they deid yet?

---

Unfortunately not .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by monktonharp

this is all very complex!?!! if you are reffering to the forthcoming referendum vote on the 18th of September, can I remind you and a few others on here that the vote is for YES/NO AND IT IS FOR INDEPENDENCE OR NOT for Independence. It Is not a vote for Alex Salmond, and it is not for the SNP. all very confusing. there are/will be thousands who will vote for YES, who have no allegiance with the SNP or otherwise.

---

if the SNP were to get involved in this an assist the YAMS they would defo lose my families vote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Weststandwanab

Thank you.

Funnily enough I thought that was the purpose of the Multi quote too -

---

I seem to recall that you got a bit of a scolding on the Bounce about multi-quoting.


But that was because you DIDN'T use it at first and you were told to do so!

:greengrin


That was you wasn't it?

Seems you just can't please everyone eh!
:tee hee:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by oldbutdim

I seem to recall that you got a bit of a scolding on the Bounce about multi-quoting.


But that was because you DIDN'T use it at first and you were told to do so!

:greengrin


That was you wasn't it?

Seems you just can't please everyone eh!
:tee hee:

---

You are 100% correct Sir and indeed you cannot.